Egalitarian Model Of Healthcare

A widely debated topic in current political discussions is the issue of access to basic healthcare. Specifically, Liberal Egalitarians and Libertarians have immensely varying view points on the issue. Healthcare is a moral right. To deny humans access to lifesaving measures and preventative care is inhumane and is an archaic and obsolete way of thinking. The current state of healthcare in the United States solely caters to the wealthy and those who have obscenely expensive private insurance policies. Without said insurance policies, many are left without access to basic care and preventative measures that result in a misuse of emergency medicine and perpetuate the crisis of high healthcare costs in the United States. Liberal Egalitarian political
Under this model, individuals ought to have equal access to goods and services regardless of individual status and resources. In terms of healthcare, this would mean that regardless of income, race, gender, or any other social construct, one would receive proper medical care. Additionally, under the Egalitarian model, one ought not be discriminated against due to personal need. This essentially means that an individual with a preexisting condition or disability should not be turned away from healthcare simply because they require more care. These ideas transcend into healthcare in the form of two models: single-tier and two-tier. To better understand the two models, one can study countries such as Canada and England which have similar systems in place. In Canada, there is one healthcare system in place for all people; making this a version of the single-tier model. The government runs the healthcare system through taxpayer dollars and in turn, everyone is provided equal healthcare. However, in England, where there is a two-tier system, there are two options available for accessing healthcare services. A basic system is in place that is available without additional cost (aside from the standard taxation), and an option available to pay extra and receive privatized care. For an individual with no particular preference, one could opt for the standard coverage. Whereas someone with specific partiality in regard to their care, they are able to pay into the privatized model. Under these models, all people have access to care which is a right. However, with such an immense benefit, there comes disadvantages. Critics of the Egalitarian model of healthcare can argue that these disadvantages stifle their liberty to regulate their own healthcare. Since all citizens are provided care through the same system and physicians and providers are limited, lengthy wait