Preview

Eisenhower Civil Rights Movement Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
778 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Eisenhower Civil Rights Movement Analysis
Let's start with Republican Dwight D. Eisenhower,elected in 1952. Eisenhower was well aware of the Democratic Congressional commitment to racial segregation. He understood it to be very difficult to make changes in the law and that his progress would be slow. Eisenhower was determined to eliminate racial discrimination in all areas under his authority he issued executive orders halting segregation in the DC area and in federal agencies. Eisenhower was the first president to appoint a black American Frederic Morrow to an executive position on the White House staff. He proposed a civil rights legislative protection plan for blacks in the Southern Democrats States. Democrats in Congress prevented any legislative progress.
In fact, when Eisenhower
…show more content…
In fact South Carolina's Senator Storm Thurmond, a Democrat, set the record for the longest individual filibuster speech ever given in Senate history. In 1959 Eisenhower presented a second civil rights bill to Congress again it He spoke for over 24 hours this great effort was solely to block Eisenhower's 1957 civil rights bill, it did unfortunately result in a very watered down version of Eisenhower's original bill.
Once again the bill met with opposition in the House by the Democrats. The bill finally passed in the House and arrived in the Senate. It was gutted by the Democrats before being passed into law. These efforts by Eisenhower played a prominent role in helping secure the civil rights movement during the 1960s and 1970s.
Unfortunately, most Americans do not know their history. When Democrat John F Kennedy was elected in 1960 he was less willing than Eisenhower to utilize executive orders to promote civil rights. Kennedy delayed for more than 2 years signing an executive order to integrate public housing. It wasn't until after Democratic Governor George Wallace prevented blacks from entering public schools in Birmingham in 1963 when Kennedy sent a major civil rights bill to Congress, a bill actually based on Eisenhower's 1957 Civil Rights Commission. After Kennedy sent this major civil rights bill to Congress he did work
…show more content…
But thanks to Republican senator Everett Dirksen who resurrected Eisenhower's civil rights bill which allowed Johnson to sign into law the Civil Rights Act of 1964 then the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Although, both of these important Civil Rights Act was signed into law under a Democratic President it was the Republicans in Congress who made it possible. Johnson was unable to get significant Democratic support to pass either bill during this time. Democrats had 315 members in Congress holding almost two-thirds of the house and two thirds of the Senate. Johnson only needed a majority, only 269 votes to get the bills passed but out of the 315 Democrats only 198 voted for the civil rights and Voting Rights Acts. The Democrats had it completely within their power to pass the bill but did not ,it was the Republicans that overwhelmingly came to the aid of the Democrat President Johnson. In fact 83% of Republicans voted for those bills an almost 20 points higher than that of the Democrats. If it had not been for the strong supporting Republicans the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 would never have become law. Let’s not to overlook the fact that the heart of both bills came from the work of a Republican President Dwight D

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Kennedy received opposition from three main groups: Protestant Christians, older members of Congress and Southern Democrats. Each of these groups had a problem with the way Kennedy was going about his job. The Protestants were suspicious of Kennedy because he was Catholic, and the majority of presidents before him were Protestant. Older members of Congress felt Kennedy was too young and inexperienced to handle the job he had been given; this distrust was amplified by the fact that Kennedy never made much of an effort to persuade members of Congress to support his policies. But Kennedy received the most opposition from Southern Democrats, who were opposed to black Civil Rights. Kennedy hoped to be re-elected in 1964 and needed the support of these Congressman, and as a result did not play a leading role in the Civil Rights Movement for fear of losing their support.…

    • 613 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the law upheld, a very powerful legal tool was available to enforce equal treatment. Over the years, there have been fewer and fewer instances of direct racial discrimination in public accommodations. Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in response to ongoing discrimination against African-Americans, despite US Supreme Court rulings declaring these practices unconstitutional. The Eisenhower administration had little interest in protecting African-Americans' civil rights, so many parts of the country (especially the South) ignored the Supreme Court and continued operating under Jim Crow conditions. Both the Kennedy and Johnson administrations made civil rights and constitutional protection a higher priority, resulting in enforceable legislation like the Civil Rights Act of 1964.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Opposed to popular belief, the prosperity of that era didn’t extend to all citizens. Many of the Black American citizens didn’t have the privilege to move to the Northern cities which meant they had to continue living an unpleasant reality that was influenced by their segregated environment . Jim Crow Laws continued to subjugate Blacks into being strictly inferior and in essence, oppressed. A court case that heavily impacted society during the 1950s is Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas which went against the ruling of Plessy v. Ferguson (“separate but equal”) and deemed the segregation in public schools as “ unlawful and unconstitutional” . Due to the South being very resistant to this new mentality, Southern Senators signed the…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil Rights Act faced a lot of opposition from the southern states who fought to keep the bill from passing any way they could, even with the use of a 75-day Senate filibuster. While nearly every member from the South argued against it and eventually did vote against it, members from the North…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some historians argue that Lyndon B Johnson was significant improving civil rights for African-Americans during his presidency. For example, “He was able to push through the landmark laws of 64 and 65” (source one). This suggests that he was committed to civil rights and was trying to help black citizens. In addition, in relation to the Civil Rights act and The Voting Rights act being passed, some historians suggest that these acts were “Johnson’s greatest achievement but also formed part of a wider vision”. In corroboration with source 1, this continues to suggest that Johnson was dedicated to Civil Rights and maintained the idea that America was in needed help to improve relations and better social acceptance. Furthermore, the history learning site shows that Johnson wanted to help the situation by quoting that “Johnson continued that discrimination was morally wrong and wanted a change.” To continue this point, “President Johnson provided a federal troop escort so the marchers could finish their march” (source 12). According to own research (www.history.co.uk – History…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On the other hand, civil rights improved greatly with the Eisenhower administration. President Eisenhower was very determined to end segregation would not stop until he had done exactly that. Following in the Truman's footsteps, by October in 1954, all army units were desegregated. Throughout the nation, many objected the act and openly opposed the president’s actions. Although it turned out to be weaker than intended, the civil rights act of 1957 did become one of Eisenhower's strongest contributions to the civil rights movement in the United States. To follow up this law and ensure that it…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Johnson signed the Civil Right Act of 1964 out of principal because of his past experience’s, he was willing to lose election to pass the act, and he was free from southern segregationist…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He evoked memories of the deceased Kennedy as a moral lever to pry bills out of congressional committees. Johnson even persuaded Congress to pass the most comprehensive civil rights bill in American history. The bill passed in 1964 after being delayed…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ 07- Lyndon B. Johnson

    • 908 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Johnson used the nations grief to pass the civil rights bill. It had the same idea of the bill Kennedy was planning on passing, but the difference was that Johnson’s was stronger and more powerful. This act was passed in July of 1964, and it outlawed radical discrimination in all public places. Places that included hotels, and restaurants, it banned the discrimination of unions, and the employers and even programs that were funded by the federal government. The civil rights act was not the only thing passed in 1964 though, he also passed the Economic Opportunity Act. As seen in document B, the act was made to help people in poverty. It started head start, a preschool program funded by the government, and gave workers and farmers money to break through and escape from poverty. It improved what was being done in our nation at that time, and became a milestone for our 180-year search for a better life for our people.…

    • 908 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American civil rights movement succeed in integrating society by breaking segregation in education and evolving legislature to not only prohibit but to demonize open racial discrimination and bigotry. If Eisenhower never did what he did, then I assure that ethnic relations today would be very different. We would have never have gotten this far if that man hadn't stepped up in spite of being a white man and them being black; If he hadn't done what no one thought a white man like himself would have ever done. Society today would not be the same, and I genuinely believe that the real Cecil knows that too.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conservatism In The 1960s

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Despite the emergence of modern conservatism, the 1960s were a very liberal decade. The early years were very optimistic and president Kennedy even lowered taxes. President Johnson admired FDR and modeled his Great Society after the New Deal. One of the most important aspects of the Great Society was the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which gave African Americans more rights and freedoms by attempting to end discrimination. The rise of modern conservatism appeared in the wake of all the liberal reforms associated with the Great Society. At this time, many southern Democrats were strongly against desegregation and the Civil Rights Movement, which added to the development of modern conservatism. These issues became even more prominent because 1964…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the summer of 1964, Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act. This was a major turning point in the political parties, as it caused an undeniable shift as to which party held the majority of black voters. However, despite Lyndon B. Johnson being a democrat, he did not have the widespread support of his party. Out of the democratic representatives of the House and Senate, 64, and 69 percent of the representatives voted in favor of the act, respectively. On the Republican side, it was 80, and 82 percent for the House and Senate support. This indicates that in 1964, it was the Republican party who championed Civil Rights, despite it being a Democrat who happened to be in a position where he could pass the act. This set the stage for a future pipeline of black voters for the Democratic party, and led to shifts in Republican ideology that would stand until modern day.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Democrats vs. Republicans

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    *Democrats passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which forbade discrimination on accound of sex or race.3…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1972 The Equal Opportunities Act of 1972 set up a commission to enforce the…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Going back to his roots, Eisenhower stood strong on his values and beliefs and did not do much to advance forward for civil rights. You could say that his adaptive leadership qualities were not strong. It’s possible that his strong military background made it hard for him to focus more and domestic problems versus foreign ones. He did not give much public support to the famous integration case Brown v. Topeka in 1954. A man by the name Orval Faubus saw this as an opportunity to make Eisenhower look bad. Faubus was from Arkansas called a court order to integrate Central High in Little Rock (Ambrose). “He called out the Arkansas National Guard and placed it around the high school, with orders to prevent the entry into the school of about a dozen Negro pupils.” (Ambrose). Eisenhower proved to handle this situation with poise by calling in the 101st Airborne and sent them to Little Rock. Both the National Guard and the 101st cooperated and ensured peaceful integration (Ambrose). Eisenhower did not particularly like using the military to handle these issues and did not plan to use it in such a manner again.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays