Preview

Eisenhower's Response To The American War

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
128 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Eisenhower's Response To The American War
the reasoning behind massive retaliation and brinkmanship was to keep the soviet union from setting up communist governments within developing countries and it was also used to keep the soviet union from expanding their control into other countries. Eisenhower used these methods to threaten the soviet union whenever they were trying to get more land and setup more communist governments. Eisenhower used these methods in the Korean war to scare the north Koreans into stopping the fight and it worked because at that time the U.S was the only country that had the atomic bomb and the Koreans knew that the U.S used them before and they were scared so they stopped fighting and setup an agreement between the north and the south and created the demilitarized

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The term "massive retaliation" was a term used to describe a policy. This policy enabled Eisenhower to cut the budget of military spending from a large 50 billion to a drastic change of 34 billion. The term "brinkmanship" was used to say the willingness to go to brink of war to force the other side to back down and argued that it was far to dangerous. Eisenhower used these concepts to help end the Korean War because he had in mind that with less of a military budget that there would be less supplies to carry on a war for much longer. He used brinkmanship to help end the Korean War by trying to get the opponents to back down from the war so that end result there would be no Korean War.…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During World War 2, many leaders emerged from chaos and destruction that it had caused, either helping their people for goods or to find a way to suit their own personal needs. Dwight D. Eisenhower, the then Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces, helped the United States tremendously with the war effort by becoming the main commander of their armed forces. He led the attack in North Africa known as Operation Torch, and orchestrated the infamous D-Day on June 6, 1944. He was also known to be the cause for Germany’s surrender, which led to a chain reaction in which ultimately resulted in the end of the Second Great World War.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With the end of World War 2 came the Cold war with many controversies even between former allies. Communist Russia forced control over their section that was gained in the Potsdam conference. They set up many barriers around their portion of East Berlin and eventually around East Germany. America had dropped the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and a new technology been revealed as a massive, deadly weapon that could wipe out thousands instantly, it was now an arms race. “Push of a button in Russia, and 35 minutes later much of U.S. could be laid to waste—with power to retaliate limited.” (Document E)…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On June 6, 1944, our future President Dwight D. Eisenhower who was a general at the time and Supreme Commander of the Allied Expeditionary Force in Europe, gave permission for Operation Overlord. This operation was a massive invasion in Europe during the German Nazi era. Eisenhower’s motivational speech was full of positivity and confidence for the troops. Using phrases such as, “The eyes of the world are upon you,” and “We will accept nothing less than full victory,” shows how the usage in Eisenhower’s words are meant to pressure the soldiers. He therefore wants his men to know that not only does he have expectations for them, but America as well. Eisenhower appeals to the emotions of his audience by targeting the values and purpose of serving…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Eisenhower's farewell address, he talks about how civilians could die from war by the military force. He warned other civilians about the dangers of allowing a military industrial complex to take control of the United States. Eisenhower wants to keep peace, to foster progress in human achievement, and to enhance liberty, dignity and integrity among people and among nations. In Paul Potter’s speech, he says that the United States actions in Vietnam may pose a threat to world peace. Paul Potter criticized the belief that the United States is defending freedom in Vietnam, knowing that the war doesn’t protect the freedom of the people in Vietnam.…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ap Us History 2001 Dbq

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How successfully did Eisenhower’s administration address Cold War fears after WWII from 1948 to 1961?…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cold War Dbq

    • 2250 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the development of the Cold War The Truman Doctrine in fact did not threaten communism because it clearly states that it is to contain communism not destroy it. The overall goal was to back up the surrounding countries if the communism spread. So it was not an act of aggression. (Flynn)…

    • 2250 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On December 8, 1953, Dwight D. Eisenhower gave a speech called “Atoms For Peace”. The speech was give in hope to end the use of atomic bomb and have peace across the nations. Also in hopes to have Peace treaties between Soviet Union, Germany, Austria, and Eastern Europe. This is all taking place after World War I, where they dropped two bombs on Japan, which took place August 6 and 9 of 1945. The bomb droppings devastated Japan and killed roughly about 214,000 of innocent people. After this, the United States decided against using atomic bombs. Giving this speech Dwight D. Eisenhower hoped to make peace treaties between the countries at war. In this speech, Dwight D, Eisenhower was successful and effective with his use of Ethos, Pathos, and Logos to promote and encourage peace amongst the nations.…

    • 629 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The cautious policies that were executed by President John F. Kennedy and his administration were directly influenced by all the pressures that surrounded Kennedy and, thankfully, prevented the cold war from escalating. Kennedy had to utilize all the hard lessons provided from the first and second World Wars in order to avoid repeating the same mistakes, to instead make a strong and good decision as leader of our country. Some of the pressures that Kennedy was under were; to first avoid engaging in a nuclear war with the Soviet Union and the second was to uphold American morals. With all this weight on Kennedy shoulders him and his administration had to take a diplomatic approach and attempt to come to an agreement with the Soviet union…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Truman Decision

    • 5419 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Some authors, outraged at the determination to use atomic weaponry, have speculated that Truman decision was based upon diplomatic problems concerning the Soviet Union. These critics have argued that Truman used atomic weaponry in order to make the Soviet Union more likely to adhere to an American viewpoint of the post-war world. They also contend that the atomic bomb was used because of its ability to bring about the end of the war before the Soviet Union had a chance to occupy Manchuria. The most critical of these scholars have gone as far as to say that the decision to use the bomb in order to intimidate the Soviet Union was the first step towards the Cold War.…

    • 5419 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The mutual suspicion and dislike between the Soviet Union and the United States of America was the most important factor in the Cold War because it created distrust and continuous skepticism between the two world powers and their contrasting beliefs. For instance, when the Allies planned to beat the Axis in World War 2, the Soviet Union fought extremely hard along the Eastern Front, while the US and Great Britain were supposed to be landing in France, during the D-Day attack. But, this attack didn’t take place until almost two years after the Soviet Union had won the Eastern Front. This made Stalin and his troops very suspicious of the US, which continued until after the war. Stalin felt that Churchill and Roosevelt were teaming up on him, and weren’t going to do their part in ending the war.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Neither side was ever fully committed to peaceful coexistence. It was a policy that, at time was in the best interests both superpowers for various reasons. For the USSR, one of the main reasons was that Khrushchev wanted to establish his position and separate himself from Stalin (though his policy of ‘destalinisation’) and peaceful coexistence was part of this plan. However, there were other reasons; the Russian economy was not matched with the economy of the USA and Khrushchev wanted to buy time to allow them to ‘catch up’ with the USA. Also the development of nuclear weapons made conflict with the USA undesirable for the USSR, the fact that they continued developing nuclear weapons throughout the period of peaceful coexistence shows that, although at the time it was beneficial to them, it was only superficial and they wanted to be prepared for when it was over. The USA also saw the benefits of peaceful coexistence, the Korean War had cost the USA millions of dollars and Eisenhower had promised to reduce the deficit by cutting back military spending. By agreeing to peaceful coexistence he ensured that there would be no major spending on war in the near future. Also there were many domestic issues in the USA at the time over the civil rights movement and so they were wary of…

    • 990 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    "We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained, it must not break our bonds of affection." This was the closing to President Lincoln's first inaugural address. He was telling the people of the United States that they will be together forever, and he will respect the country. However, once the war started and as it went on, his thinking change. Lincoln's attitude towards the war and his mindset about the end goal of the war changed as the war went on.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with both countries were nuclear armed, it didnt help out at all, it just made things worse. There was a constant fear that, because there was not at the time a definitive World…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juan, greatly detailed post, in regarding Massive Retaliation, I believe that it caught attention due to it being "lost cost." It had also been an attempt to explain the Korean War. Korea would never have happened, the argument went, had the Communists known that the US would discipline. Thus, when allies were scared from a lack of American commitment to extended restraint. We had a communication problem; the other side did not know that we were deadly…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays