Preview

Elizabeth's Argument Against Legal Normativity

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
135 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Elizabeth's Argument Against Legal Normativity
As mentioned by Elizabeth, my argument in the paper was weak as I was unable to elucidate it well. However, Elizabeth misunderstood my argument; I had intended to argue that legal normativity is an ineffective form of moral normativity, when taken from the perspective of natural law theorists, whose ultimate goal is to promote social harmony. Evidently, I did not articulate this argument well enough, which caused the misunderstanding. (Elizabeth had interpreted my argument as emphasizing the functions of society, and regarding whether these functions were moral.) I rephrased my argument to prevent further misunderstanding. Fortunately, with her comments, I noticed that certain parts of my essay were vague, required citations or were phrased
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Section 2 And Sherman Act Of 1890
    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Section 2 And Sherman Act Of 1890

    According to Paddy McNutt “The economic analysis of law does not necessarily seek the correct answer to law problems from within the law but regards law as a social phenomenon”.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    PHL 612: Philosophy of Law
    • 5890 Words
    • 24 Pages

    PHL 612: Philosophy of Law

    PHL 612 Philosophy of Law [Calendar Description]: What is law? What makes something a legal norm? Should citizens always obey the law? What is the relationship between law and morality? This course will explore competing theories of law, such as natural law and positivism, and touch on crucial debates over civil disobedience, purposes of punishment, and interpretation of legal texts. It will deal with contemporary controversies over the legal regulation of human behaviour, for instance in matters of sexual morality.…

    • 5890 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lang Essay
    • 543 Words
    • 1 Page

    Lang Essay

    provide more credibility throughout the essay since she was the one who is talking about her own…

    • 543 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    C. Lewis Mere Christianity
    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages

    C. Lewis Mere Christianity

    D. Lewis disproves the idea that the Moral Law is just a social convention by declaring that one cannot compare another culture’s or era’s moralities as better or worse unless one has a standard morality to compare it to. (12-15)…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Emerson Thoreau Individualism
    • 844 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Emerson Thoreau Individualism

    norms as they see many of these laws as arbitrary and prejudiced, and see their very existence as…

    • 844 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Conflict Vs. Consensus Models Of Criminal Justice
    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Conflict Vs. Consensus Models Of Criminal Justice

    modified legalistic   Sutherland Definition is similar to Tappan’s legalistic definition, but suggests that crime is a behavior that causes injury to the State. Sutherland suggested that “an unlawful act is not defined as criminal by the fact that it is punished, but by the fact that it is punishable” c. normative   Mannheim & Sellin Defined crime broadly as a violation of conduct norms. Recognizes that not all antisocial behaviors are going to be prohibited by legal code at all places, at all…

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Separation Thesis Ideology
    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Separation Thesis Ideology

    In the context of Jurisprudence, the Separation Thesis ideology, the view of Legal positivists, asserts that while legal and moral obligation are separate and there is no necessary connection between law and morals, legal and moral obligation sometimes overlap and it may be necessary to examine the standard of rules as it relates to our obligation to obey them, although, there is no rule to obey laws. 1 Contrary to the view of Legal positivists, the natural law theory denotes that rules of law are derived from principles protecting an individual’s rights and principles of morality.2 In other words, the fundamental criteria for validity of the law is based on principles of justice and morality.3 This essay will briefly examine the origin of the Separation Thesis (the “Thesis’), analyse the Thesis with reference to H. L. A Hart’s views, present opposing views and argue that the claim of the Separation Thesis, that there is no necessary relationship between legal and moral obligation is flawed. Finally, it will provide a conclusion for the arguments set forth.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law and Conflicting Perspectives
    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Law and Conflicting Perspectives

    Composers represent conflicting perspectives through their own unique experiences and values as their political and social contexts. Geoffrey Robertson's self styled memoir 'The Justice Game' written in the late 1900's heavily reflects these conflicting perspectives in the 'Trials of Oz' and 'The Romans in Britain' through the employment of emotive and persuasive language and ridicule in the form of satire to which convey Robertson's view through his eyes. Such conflicts also portrayed in Charles Waterstreet's article' It's a long fickle road to justice' which similar to Robertson's use of persuasive techniques utilizes satire to challenge and question the myopic procedures of the legal system.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Final Exam Study guide
    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Final Exam Study guide

    -The idea that popular notions of morality should influence decisions about what behaviors the law ought to regulate. (The law should enforce public morality)…

    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The End
    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The End

    6. According to the authors, law is stripped of any moral overtones under the positive law approach and simply boils down what the majority wants. Give an example of a law that falls under this approach (even though some might feel it is morally wrong).…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism And Virtue Theory
    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Utilitarianism And Virtue Theory

    There is way of living that is in accordance with human nature, this kind of natural law theory holds, and morality prescribes that we live such a life. Its was interesting how this even applies to the use of birth control.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Is The Moral Of Huckleberry Finn
    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What Is The Moral Of Huckleberry Finn

    Laws in our society are supposed to keep us safe and help us make good decisions, but what if those laws go against our moral judgements? Decisions are often based on what a person feels is right and what society deems to be correct. Laws help make the world feel safer, but they can also stop people from doing what they think is right. Making decisions based on morality can often have adverse effects, but making these decisions can help a person identify themselves and their own moral compass. In Mark Twain’s…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetoric Reflection
    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rhetoric Reflection

    These remarks were both good and bad, both in which helped me understand the concept of an analysis paper. One of the good remarks that stood out was when she commented I had a good point when I wrote, “Throughout her article, she does not cite a list of things as far as during research. However, that does not make her argument weaker. It solely means that by her knowledge of this particular stereotype and by analyzing the movie she does not need many sources to illustrate the point of her argument.” I really appreciated that because when reading over the article and noticing the lack of abundant sources, yet still understanding the argument she was giving made me realize that there are ways to argue a topic without having a lot of back up support. One of the mistakes I had was mentioning an idea but not analyzing it, for example: “She talks about other movies, ads, and commercials in which black women are represented so poorly.” That comment made me recognize the difference between an analysis paper and any other paper. When writing an analysis it is important to elaborate on every example that is given. Whereas with others papers an example can be given and moved on from because the point of that example differs. When analyzing the meaning of the example is what is more important over the example…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Queen Elizabeth's Absolutism In England
    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Queen Elizabeth's Absolutism In England

    In the beginning, England was strictly a place of Absolutism. Gradually, it transitioned into a Constitutionalism. On the other hand, Russia remained an Absolutism and flourished under their monarch.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Bentham and Hobbes: Two Theories of Legislation
    • 2569 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Bentham and Hobbes: Two Theories of Legislation

    Thomas Hobbes and Jeremy Bentham were both legal positivists. In an attempt to solve the problem of interpretation, legal positivists conclude that there is only one way to interpret a law. According to Hobbes ' theory of legislation, it is the people who enforce the law that decide what it means. On the other hand, Bentham argues that promulgating the reasons for a law solves the interpretation problem. Both Bentham and Hobbes viewed law somewhat negatively; arguing that the nature of the law is a restraint on liberty. Their two theories differ the most in regards to natural law. In this paper, I will explain both Hobbes ' and Bentham 's theories of legislation and apply them to the Supreme Court Case Marbury v. Madison.…

    • 2569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics