even the denial of the history of the colonized.” (286) Zionist discourse presents its history through a Eurocentric grid, with the Palestinian’s possessing a counter narrative, and the Sephardi tangled in the history of both and fragments embedded in each. She argues, though, each version of history neglects the crucial elements of economic and financial interests with the migration of populations. The Sephardim became a source of cheap labor, also allowing the Zionists to denounce their association with colonialism, as they were not exploiting native labor. This migration of the Sephardim created a solution and “quasi-redemption of a culture” for the Ashkenazim minorities, but a “complete annihilation of a cultural heritage” for the other. (Shohat 303) Shohat argues, what the Ashkenazi was to the European, the Sephardim are to the Ashkenazi, making Israel the only place the Sephardim exists in oppression.
even the denial of the history of the colonized.” (286) Zionist discourse presents its history through a Eurocentric grid, with the Palestinian’s possessing a counter narrative, and the Sephardi tangled in the history of both and fragments embedded in each. She argues, though, each version of history neglects the crucial elements of economic and financial interests with the migration of populations. The Sephardim became a source of cheap labor, also allowing the Zionists to denounce their association with colonialism, as they were not exploiting native labor. This migration of the Sephardim created a solution and “quasi-redemption of a culture” for the Ashkenazim minorities, but a “complete annihilation of a cultural heritage” for the other. (Shohat 303) Shohat argues, what the Ashkenazi was to the European, the Sephardim are to the Ashkenazi, making Israel the only place the Sephardim exists in oppression.