Preview

Emile Durkheim; Division of Labour in Society

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2011 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Emile Durkheim; Division of Labour in Society
Durkheim argued that social structure depends on the level of division of labour in a society .In other words, in the manner in which tasks are performed. Thus, a task such as providing food can be carried out almost totally by one individual or can be divided among many people .The latter pattern typically occurs in modern societies;cultivation,processing,distribution and retailing of a single food item are performed by literally hundreds of people.

In societies in which there is minimal division of labour, a collective consciousness develops with emphasis on group solidarity, implying that all individuals perform the same tasks. Since everyone is engaged in similar work, each person prepares food, hunts, makes clothing, and builds homes and so forth. People have few options regarding what to do with their lives, consequently, there is little concern for individual needs.Instead, the group will is the dominating force in society. Both social interaction and negotiation are based on close, intimate, face to face social contacts. Since there is little specialization, there are few social roles.

As societies become more advanced technologically, greater division of labor takes place. The person who cuts down timber is not the same person who puts up your roof. With increasing specialization, many different tasks must be performed by different individuals even in manufacturing items such as radios or stoves.

In general, social interactions became less personal than in societies characterized by mechanical solidarity. We begin relating to others on the basis of their social position rather than their distinctive human qualities. Social roles are perpetual flux as the overall social structure of the society continues to change.

In Durkheim’s theory, organic solidarity involves a collective consciousness resting on the society’s need members have for one another. When society becomes more complex and there is greater division of labour no individual can do it



References: 1. Giddens.A.2001.Sociology.Blackwell Publishing Limited Cambridge, UK. 2. Robert.P. Gwim.1991.Encyclopedia Brittainica,Volume 27,25 3. Schaefer.P.G.1991.Introduction to Sociology.Illinous University,U.S.A

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Nt1310 Unit 1 Assignment 1

    • 7711 Words
    • 31 Pages

    The changing needs of people led to the development of a means to make tasks a lot easier and more convenient. This is technology. It is a tool that now plays an important role in people’s everyday life. Because of this technology every complicated task is now provided with an equal solution. Hence, the difficulties that people experience in doing tasks are minimized. It is not impossible that in the near future, these difficulties will be eliminated. When this happens, industrial evolution will surely take place.…

    • 7711 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of Durkheim’s major works was a Book called ‘The division of labor in society’. This is known as one of his most famous books, as it includes some key elements of his sociological thoughts. In this book, Durkheim wrote about the differences within traditional and modern societies. He describes traditional societies as having a low division of labor in society- resulting in mechanical solidarity. This is a term that Durkheim used to explain small compact and quite simple societies such as small rural villages, where there was a strong…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Ayau, trade and cooperation is beneficial to all parties despite differences among them in terms of capacity and talent. He states that everyone is made wealthier through cooperation, and how it is that the market economy leads to the benefit of everyone. In our world today, people base their decisions on the comparison of alternative opportunity costs at the margin, so naturally, they choose the least costly option. However, a person can only get rich by enriching others torpedoes claims to the moral high ground of those who propose that government redistribution of wealth is a means to alleviate poverty (Ayau 32). Ayau explains the workings of the free enterprise system, based on the benefits from mutual gains from trade arising from the creative productivity of a market-based and profit-guided system of division of labor. In addition, he explains that the division of labor through comparative advantage, satisfying society’s needs, trading with and by enriching others is the way someone gain wealth. He says people intuitively do what goes by the name of cost/benefit analysis, for they are quite conscious of what they are quite conscious of what they must forgo to acquire whatever they get in exchange.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Emile Durkheim was a French sociologist who felt that modernization occurred because of an increase in “specialized economic activity” (Macionis, 2006). His theory suggests that in years past, the traditional members of society all shared the same activities. Tasks such as farming, fishing, and cooking, gathering wood and gathering water were many of the shared activities of a community in the past centuries.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Émile Durkheim (1858 – 1917) was also a sociologist, social psychologist and philosopher like Mead, except, unlike Mead, he was French. His three major works include “The Division of Labor” (1893), “Suicide” (1897), and “The Elementary Forms of Religious Life” (1912) and he believed that they all explained a social phenomena. Durkheim’s theories were based on things that were external in nature as opposed to those that were internal in nature. The division of labor occurred when social organization shifted from being traditional (Mechanical Solidarity) to modern (Organic Solidarity). In the olden days, people were self-sufficient, feeding themselves and their families, bounded by similarities in religions, values, societal norms, occupations, backgrounds,… However, in the modern…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ghosts Real or Not? As technology demands more from human existence, many interpretations of different phenomenons are misunderstood. The world is filled with many misunderstood paradoxes that makes us uncomfortable but they still exist in dark places. To further expand the topic, ghosts are spirits that still need evidence to make their existence.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also, we as a society cannot achieve better if we work alone compare to working together. Such as, neanderthal and how they weren’t able to survive compared to us (homosapien). Neanderthal is a specie that works alone and are powerful. However, they dislike working together as a whole. They have so much potential to be the strongest specie on this world, but the one reason that brought them to extinction is their choice of working alone instead of together. We (homosapien) ended up being superior since we are able to group up and work together to survive. Division is the number one problem and if we are able to fix it, we can be greater and better as a whole. To bring this discussion back, I believe that cooperation is one of the most important trait to develop. It’s better to have help than to just try to accomplish a problem by oneself. Cooperation is one of the few traits that we don’t value as much as other traits until we see how much effect it has on us. However, as society advances, it still leaves us with a question regarding collaboration and division, will society choose to be divided or will they realize the value in working together as a…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sociology WA1

    • 1747 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Schaefer, Richard T., and Robert P. Lamm. Sociology--a Brief Introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, 1997. Print.…

    • 1747 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Emile Durkheim was a French theorist who wanted to create an ideal of sociology based on the idea that society is an unbiased and limiting material reality, independent to the individual. According to Durkheim, the division of labor is basically a significant source of social solidarity dating back to the foundation of life that links together and affects civil, economic, educational, and legal processes. This new…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Community and identity are highly epazied when Lenina says, "Everyone works for everyone else. We can't do without any one. Even Epsilons"(Huxley 91). No matter who you are, no matter what class you are everyone is working together and everyone benefits from this phrase. The social castes move from the Alphas, the most talented and beautiful people in society, to the Epsilons and Gammas, the world's less talented and smart. The most important meaning in that phrase is “Stability” because only through stability can happiness be maintained and all unpleasant feelings and emotions can be deleted. Without stability in this society there will be no community, identity, and happiness. Each person’s conditioning causes him to feel as if they are all part of one a social system. This phrase is later pointed out that this system sincerely benefits those who rule and run it, not those who are part of it. For example, in the text Brave New World it states, "The more stitches the less riches"(51). The phrase is set so deeply go into the awareness of everyone that they take it’s meaning to be reality. In this case, the phrase sparks consumer behavior, if people fix their own clothes than rather buying it the companies are not going to make money. Resulting in much less cash within the economic system of society. Creating consumption is one of the leader responsibilities of government because…

    • 1967 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For Bowles and Gintis (2013), acting morally is an essential component to ensuring the success of the group or society as a whole. Modern day examples include the joint pursuit of political and military objectives, as well as the more prosaic foundations of everyday occurrences, such as collaboration among employees in a large corporation. Without cooperation, these interdependent ventures would be hopelessly fraught with difficulties, and economic stability would be tremendously precarious. To avoid such catastrophes, Bowles and Gintis (2013) argue that at some point in time humans must have adopted elaborate systems of socialization that allowed them to internalize the norms that induce cooperation, so that contributing to common objectives and punishing those who were motivated by personal agendas became second nature. Together, the collective internalization of prosocial norms and the devout protection of the altruists from exploitation serve to indemnify the competitive handicaps born by those who were motivated to sacrifice personal luxuries to benefit…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Social Structure

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this paper I will be exploring my social structure and defining my place in social groups. I will be using information learned from the textbook (The Sociology Project, 2013), as well as my own thought process to complete the paper. It will help with not only understanding myself and the class but with being able to finish my final project as well.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Collins adds, "Like the privileged, members of subordinate groups must also work toward replacing judgments by category with new ways of thinking and acting. Refusing to do so stifles prospects for effective coalition and social change" (Collins). The social change cannot be stifled, for a new generation must be better than this one. One should learn to love a neighbor as they love themselves. There is no man who can pick the worthy and the worthless. This planet has been given to man so that they can populate the earth and grow as a unit. When the society takes censuses, we do not collect the population as individual parts, we collect the unity of habitants. This common, but easily forgotten routine alone shows you that as a whole we are valued, not as individual…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Importance of Community

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    We share our work and this division of work leads to our dependency on other people working in different roles. In every walk of our lives, we have to depend on others apart from our family members. For example, the cobbler repairs shoes for us, the barber cuts our hair, tailor stitches fashionable clothes for us, butcher cuts meat for us, bakers prepares biscuits for us, engineers make houses for us, etc. All these individuals fall into a community, without whom our lives will be very difficult. Division of work is,…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Specialization has enabled societies everywhere to achieve standards of living unimaginable to our ancestors. But, if it goes too far, it can have a downside as well. In the old film Modern Times, Charlie Chaplin plays a poor soul standing at an assembly line, attaching part number 27 to part number 28 thousands of times a day. In the real world, specialization is rarely this extreme. Still, it has caused some jobs to be repetitive and boring. In some plants, workers are deliberately moved from one…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics