Emotions in the Acquisition of Knowledge
Emotions in the Acquisition of Knowledge
What influence does emotion have in the pursuit of knowledge across the areas of knowledge, history, ethics and science? Furthermore is it good or bad? Knowledge itself is neither good nor bad; rather how one choice of approach on the intentioned use of that knowledge could be argued otherwise. Opinions on Emotions and Knowledge contradict each other when it comes to the decision whether or not emotions are good or bad depending on intentions under specific conditions, perspective and the given topic piece of the knowledge that is regarded. This topic is far too ambiguous to be approached with a plain black and white direct answer. With multi-levels of complexity it must be approached with different approaches as well as perspectives making this topic very contradicting. Going through different areas of knowledge it will be quickly seen that those areas of knowledge are very closely interweaved next to each other sometimes branching off or overlapping with each other in topics. Sometimes this helps argue for and with the other area of knowledge that it overlapped other times it will completely contradict the other area of knowledge. There is no such thing as “good” or “bad” knowledge neither is there such thing as “good” or “bad” emotions. The one believes the only thing that separates the “good” and “bad” in terms of emotions and knowledge is intention. What will that piece of knowledge be used for, how do they approach gaining that piece of knowledge may be seen from perspectives as good in some eyes, as in others it will be seen as bad.
In the sciences the only way to improve and enhance technology and knowledge is experimenting, only through experiments are you abled to get answers. Formulating more and more hypotheses only raise more and further questions instead of answers. Through trial and error is how knowledge is gained in sciences making it bound that certain things may be done incorrectly and unethically. In
What influence does emotion have in the pursuit of knowledge across the areas of knowledge, history, ethics and science? Furthermore is it good or bad? Knowledge itself is neither good nor bad; rather how one choice of approach on the intentioned use of that knowledge could be argued otherwise. Opinions on Emotions and Knowledge contradict each other when it comes to the decision whether or not emotions are good or bad depending on intentions under specific conditions, perspective and the given topic piece of the knowledge that is regarded. This topic is far too ambiguous to be approached with a plain black and white direct answer. With multi-levels of complexity it must be approached with different approaches as well as perspectives making this topic very contradicting. Going through different areas of knowledge it will be quickly seen that those areas of knowledge are very closely interweaved next to each other sometimes branching off or overlapping with each other in topics. Sometimes this helps argue for and with the other area of knowledge that it overlapped other times it will completely contradict the other area of knowledge. There is no such thing as “good” or “bad” knowledge neither is there such thing as “good” or “bad” emotions. The one believes the only thing that separates the “good” and “bad” in terms of emotions and knowledge is intention. What will that piece of knowledge be used for, how do they approach gaining that piece of knowledge may be seen from perspectives as good in some eyes, as in others it will be seen as bad.
In the sciences the only way to improve and enhance technology and knowledge is experimenting, only through experiments are you abled to get answers. Formulating more and more hypotheses only raise more and further questions instead of answers. Through trial and error is how knowledge is gained in sciences making it bound that certain things may be done incorrectly and unethically. In