Preview

Emotivism Act Utilitarianism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
816 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Emotivism Act Utilitarianism
There are many different ethical theories that we have learned about throughout the semester. The three theories I have decided to use with this situation are Emotivism, Act-Utilitarianism, and Ethical Egoism. With each ethical theory, I will state why I chose the theory that addresses the situation and what it would tell Sarah to do. The first theory that address the situation is Emotivism. “Emotivism is the view that moral utterances are neither true nor false but are expressions of emotions or attitudes.” (Vaughn, 31) In other words, people can disagree only in their attitude, but not in their beliefs. There is no actual good or bad with Emotivism. It’s only the expression of favorable or unfavorable emotions or attitudes toward something. …show more content…
This theory has a lot to do with emotions and if Sarah’s emotions are feeling to break into the supermarket she is going to do it for her children. I believe she would actually steal according to this theory. The second theory that address the situation is Act-Utilitarianism. “Act-Utilitarianism says that right actions are those that directly produce the greatest overall good, everyone considered.” (Vaughn, 70) With this theory, no matter the situation, a moral judgement calls for an even balance of good over evil. Depending on the consequence, breaking a promise could be right in one situation but totally wrong in another situation. With Sarah’s situation about having a disaster destroying her city and not having any food or water for herself or children. With this situation, I believe Sarah would actually steal with this Ethical Theory because she is breaking a promise in a right situation rather than just stealing because she can. She is not only helping herself but her two children as well. …show more content…
“Ethical Egoism is that the morally right action is the one that produces the most favorable balance of good over evil for oneself.” (Vaughn, 70) So in other words, the right action is the one to progress one’s own best interest with any situation. This theory is all about yourself. Asking what actions will result for the better. In this theory, Sarah would have to act in her best interest. Acting in her best interest would be to help her children by stealing food and water. She wouldn’t need to help her children, but she could steal food and water for herself as well. With this theory, I don’t think she would steal for herself. I believe she would make her kids her first

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics (6th ed., pp. 38- 39).New York, NY: Oxford University Press.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Taking a deeper look into this situation, one must consider moral ethics, more specifically what it means to act morally. Acting morally is always a difficult and unclear task. We must also consider our obligations and duties, things that are done purely out of goodness and kindness, and not for recognition and reward; considerations of which actions are right and which actions are completely impermissible. We must also consider…

    • 2183 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethical DIlemma Worksheet

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The news have been reporting about a one of a kind ethical dilemma. Ethical dilemma begins with what is known as two situations in which there is a choice to be made between two options, neither one of which works out the situation in an ethically acceptable fashion. The following will consist of an ethical dilemma involving Sarah Murnaghan who is fighting for her life.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarian ethical theories are based on one’s ability to expect the concerns of an deed. Utilitarianism’s creed is that the result of any action takes importance over any type of means, this means that Utilitarianisms objective is to help as many individuals as possible even if it were to negatively disturb people along the way so as long as it helped the general populace. Basically, it’s the ends that matter not necessarily the means.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act Utilitarianism

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The theory of Utilitarianism was first developed by Jeremy Bentham who was a philosopher of the 18th century. Bentham developed this theory to create a modern and rational approach to morality which would suit the changing society.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Super Freakonomics Report

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages

    So though I do enjoy helping others, is it truly to help them, or my own ego, mindset, conscience? In the third chapter entitled ‘Unbelievable Stories about Apathy and Altruism,’ the first story is about a woman brutally murdered by her apartment and no one around; none of the numerous witnesses did anything to help this woman, or to stop what was going on. This sickens me. If one was to even help out in this situation, I wouldn’t even consider it altruistic; I’d consider it a moral duty. Unfortunately, I do not believe in anyone being simply altruistic, as much as I want to, and it’s sad. Humans are selfish animals. In this chapter, the authors write about an experiment done in a lab to see if altruism actually did exist by playing a game with money (a person was given a certain amount of money in which they had to split with somebody else). The average amount of money given away was twenty percent of their own, and although the scientists believe this to be an example of altruism, I have to disagree. I believe the people did that since it wasn’t their own money to spend in the first place—they hadn’t earned the money themselves, they were just receiving it, so why not give some away? Also, it would make themselves feel a little bit better; getting free money, it’s only fair to share some, correct? Their conscience came into…

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Intro To Ethics

    • 2258 Words
    • 6 Pages

    2. Moral Relativism: believe that what is good for one might not be good for another. No one is wrong; everyone is right in his or her own mind. There is no real resolution in this thought.…

    • 2258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Utilitarianism theory supports individual capability to foresee the costs of an act. A Utilitarian considers the decision of giving the best profit to a large number of people; this is known to be ethically correct.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lawn's by Mona Simpson

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Often in marriage problems or if one parent chooses his job as his first priority, the children suffer a lot from the lack of attention and care which causes them at times to be "trouble makers" but it is their only way to draw their parent's attention to them. Jenny says: " You're out of the store, you've done this thing you're not supposed to do, but no one stops you. At first it's a rush. Like you're even for everything you didn't get before. But then you're left alone, no one even notices you. Nothing changes"(Simpson 445). It is the need for attention and the hope for a change of the bad situation that drove Jenny to steal.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Martha Stewart Ethics

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In order to understand the ethics surrounding her statements and actions we must compare her actions against the different theories. Normative ethics shows us how to mentally dissect an issue and make a moral decision. There are two basic theories: utilitarian and deontological. When utilitarians make a moral decision, they look at the consequences of a decision in order to decide if it is right or wrong. This approach is called consequentialism. Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill founded the most widely accepted consequentialist theory called utilitarianism. It comes from the word utility meaning good. They suggest that given that everyone's happiness is of equal value, a decision is right if it maximizes happiness for the greatest number of people over the long term. They always look at the long-term effects and believe in the course of action that promotes the greatest good and the least harm over time.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, an ethical egoist is a person that “will rank as most important duties that bring her/him the highest payoff”. An ethical egoist is only concerned with their own self-interest and will only help others to receive something in return. In Jean Reynolds case, an ethical egoist would not benefit from helping her or her family out, in which case he/she would fall under option C. Option C, consists of Jean receiving no government funds or help and the idea that Jean should solve her problems on her own. An ethical egoist would not benefit from helping out someone else, when they receive nothing in return. Ayn Rand, was a philosopher who promoted the idea of ethical egoism and stated why she thought…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    utilitarianism

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A utilitarian believes in the action for the good for all people. This would mean that a Utilitarian would agree with the magistrate’s decision on framing the innocent man. The reason behind this agreement is that since the one man being killed is saving lives and saving chaos it makes it ethical, from a utilitarian standpoint. According to utilitarianism one must consider the consequences of a certain action. So in this case the magistrate must weigh the pros and cons of the decision to execute this man. The magistrate must be a utilitarian because he decided to kill the innocent man in an attempt make the majority of people calm. Utilitarian’s also believe in the idea of attaining happiness or pleasure. Therefore making a decision to kill the man the magistrate must believe that it will make everyone happy, making it morally correct in the magistrate’s eyes.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The consequences of shoplifting are very difficult to deal with for parents and also the shoplifter. Parents become disappointed with their child due to the standards they believe that their son or daughter should meet. And sometimes the shoplifter is in reality a good person who had no intentions of hurting anyone, so this can cause parents great emotional shock at the discovery that their child can be considered a thief. Parents are not the only ones who suffer emotionally. The person who commits the crime must also overcome a great deal of guilt and shame. Shame comes from the disappointment of parents and others who know about the crime, and many shoplifters feel guilty because after the fact they realize that they have betrayed their morals.…

    • 592 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism

    • 1278 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In A Critique of Utilitarianism, Bernard Williams argues that when following a Utilitarian approach for moral dilemmas, Utilitarianism might have us sacrifice or modify our moral integrity. Williams explains this argument with a hypothetical execution situation with protagonist Jim. Jim, who is a botanical expeditionary, accidentally wanders in the central square of a small South American town. There, he finds twenty Indians tied up in a row, with several armed soldiers standing in front of them. The captain in charge of the soldiers, Pedro, is ready to execute the Indians for protesting against the government. However, Jim is a foreigner and is honored by the captain. Because of this special occasion, Pedro gives Jim the option to shoot and kill one Indian. If Jim accepts, the other nineteen Indians can go free, if not, Pedro will shoot all twenty like intended. The Indians beg Jim to accept the offer and shoot one of them. Now, Jim is faced with a difficult decision whether to shoot one Indian or let Pedro shoot all of them. What should Jim do? It is not sure what the right course of action is, but four different theories could help him decide. These theories are: the Divine Command theory, Cultural Relativism, Kantianism, and Utilitarianism. In this paper, I will present these four theories and their suggestions for Jim’s right course of action, the faults in these theories, and how Utilitarianism is morally correct in this case.…

    • 1278 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emotivism is the position that moral judgements do not have objective, universal truth value. Moral judgements are not as they were understood for a long time - the assertion of a claim - but simply the expression of our attitudes and emotions. An emotivist scrutinizes the problem of morality and argues that in place of objectivity, there exists only a simple reaction to a thought. A. J. Ayer, the English philosopher who first advanced the philosophy argued that it is impossible to determine whether or not an ethical belief system is valid, which makes it then insensible to even ask questions regarding ethics. With this rationalization, Ayers asserts that the study of moral judgments should be centered instead on what causes people to entertain certain reactions and emotions.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays