This theory has a lot to do with emotions and if Sarah’s emotions are feeling to break into the supermarket she is going to do it for her children. I believe she would actually steal according to this theory. The second theory that address the situation is Act-Utilitarianism. “Act-Utilitarianism says that right actions are those that directly produce the greatest overall good, everyone considered.” (Vaughn, 70) With this theory, no matter the situation, a moral judgement calls for an even balance of good over evil. Depending on the consequence, breaking a promise could be right in one situation but totally wrong in another situation. With Sarah’s situation about having a disaster destroying her city and not having any food or water for herself or children. With this situation, I believe Sarah would actually steal with this Ethical Theory because she is breaking a promise in a right situation rather than just stealing because she can. She is not only helping herself but her two children as well. …show more content…
“Ethical Egoism is that the morally right action is the one that produces the most favorable balance of good over evil for oneself.” (Vaughn, 70) So in other words, the right action is the one to progress one’s own best interest with any situation. This theory is all about yourself. Asking what actions will result for the better. In this theory, Sarah would have to act in her best interest. Acting in her best interest would be to help her children by stealing food and water. She wouldn’t need to help her children, but she could steal food and water for herself as well. With this theory, I don’t think she would steal for herself. I believe she would make her kids her first