Preview

Emperor Shihuangdi vs Emperor Hadrian

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
963 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Emperor Shihuangdi vs Emperor Hadrian
ngdHuangdi versus Hadrian
Who ruled their empire more effectively?

Shi Huangdi was China’s first Emperor, and Emperor Hadrian was perhaps the Roman’s greatest Emperor. They both tried to control their empires using similar methods, such as building roads, training a strong army with military tactics, erecting frontiers to keep out the invaders. By looking at their personalities, armies, transport systems, and how they controlled the frontiers, I think Hadrian is more effective in ruling his empire.

Both Roman and Chinese people obeyed their emperors but for different reasons. This helped the emperors to keep control because people would listen to their commands and would not turn against them. Hadrian was a respected Emperor who loved his subjects. He ended unpopular wars; introduced humane laws and protected slaves from their masters. He travelled around his empire to be with his people, to witness problems faced by them. On the contrary, Shi Huangdi was an extremely ruthless person, and was feared by the people. He believed in Legalism, the belief in strict laws and punishments. In order to create the Great Wall of China, he sent thousands of people to work on it and many of them perished in the harsh conditions and treatment while building the wall.

An efficient army was important in helping the Emperors to control their empires. During Hadrian’s reign, the Roman army was the most powerful force in the ancient world. He inherited the army from Trajan, the great conqueror. There were 30 legions with 6,000 men each. Apart from the great numbers, the Roman legionaries and auxiliaries were well equipped and trained. The Roman army had experienced wars with rival kings such as Hannibal and Mithradates. The Romans also had the Germans and Celts to the north of their borders in Germany, Scotland and the Middle East. The Qin also had a large, efficient army and capable generals. The army used the most advanced weaponry of his time. Their weapons were made of



Bibliography: http://www.china-history.net/qin.htm http://www.hyperhistory.net/apwh/bios/b3huangdi-firstemperor.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qin_Shi_Huang http://ancienthistory.about.com/od/hadrian/p/Hadrian.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadrian

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both Han China and Imperial Rome used a centralized government with roads to help them rule their large empire, yet Han China had Confucianism to legitimize their rule while Roman emperors were dependent on the support of a large military force for legitimacy from 204 B.C.E to 476 C.E.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both empires established effective centralized governmental control over their vast regions and huge populations. But the Chinese, in opposition to the Romans,…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most societies that developed in ancient civilizations were centered around some form of imperial administration and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E.-476 C.E.) and Han China (206 B.C.E.-220 C.E.) were no different in this sense. Both civilizations had a network of cities and roads, with similar technologies that catalyzed cultural amalgamation and upgraded the standard of living, along with comparable organizational structures. Additionally, both civilizations had problems managing their borders and used similar tactics for defense. However, the Chinese Emperor was interpreted as a God while the Roman Emperor was a lugal, or big man, who had to fight not only to gain power, but to push through his initiatives. The similarities and differences of the control and management of both regions may be attributed to the philosophical ideas and belief systems that existed at the time, influencing political structure in similar ways with only a few minor differences that set the two cultures apart.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first comparison is that both Han China and Imperial Rome were bureaucracies. They had a sole ruler, but they had many others governing specific portions of the empire. This allowed for the empire as a whole to be in better shape. This is due to the fact that a more localized ruler would better know both the area and its needs. They would also be more dedicated to their job as they would be managing the area they live in, so every decision they make would impact not only their life but possibly the lives of family living in the regions they are governing. The empires would be much worse off if they had their single ruler managing everything, as they would not fully understand the needs of the areas, nor would they care as much as they would most likely have no personal ties to those regions. Due to this, both empires were much more powerful and well organized.…

    • 568 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Did Emperor Qin Rule

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The article “Who was Shi Huangdi and what area did he rule?”, stated Qin improved China by creating a wall known as The Great Wall of China to protect the civilization. “Shi Huangdi ordered the joining of several earlier walls on China’s northern border to be unified and to be into a single system of walls to protect the empire from attacks from the north.” When he built the Great Wall of China, this made China much safer than it was before because the wall surrounded…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper will compare similarities and the differences of the Roman and Han Dynasty empires. It will compare their creation, maintenance, culture, and decline.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Though this would be the primary dominate force on the battlefield, Rome actually lost battles because they were primarily heavy infantry. Roman soldiers adopted fighting tactics of other forces and enemies to become the most elite force on the battle field. Starting out, soldiers fought like the Greek worriers known as hoplites. Hoplites were essentially an infantry man armed with a shield and spear, which were on reserve until called to battle. The tactics that were adopted from the Hoplites was a formation called the Phalanx. This formation consisted of soldiers lining up shoulder to shoulder with their weapon in one hand and shield in the opposite. Not only did this help with shields protecting one another, it made lines impenetrable for arrows, spears and enemy as long as they maintained a solid line side by side.2…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shi Huandi started the building of the wall which helped keep the nomads out, and keep the people safe. He also made all currency the same so it was easier to pay for things, and you didn’t have to find the merchant that took your type of money. He also made all writing the same so you could read all of the rules and punishments he made. He also made the roads wider so the army's could travel through cities easier. He also made canals so you could travel easier in places they didn’t have roads. He also made a system of irrigation to water…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han Chinese were more diplomatic and wanted to avoid conflict as much as possible. There mindset was to win battles without fighting. Instead of using military and legions to defend their borders. They used walls and diplomacy to get other enemies away from attacking their borders. The romans though were a very attack mentality kind of military. They were very organized and had a lot of legions. They would use the citizens to sign up for the military. This was also a way to keep political control by making them sign up for the military. They used the legions and the military to defend their borders. A similarity though is that they both used roads and waterways for military access and trade routes. They could move the military easier from place to place. They could collect taxes and control trade. And also they could govern more effectively with use of messengers due to the…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    e west and the east, empires dominated the world from the 2nd century BC to the 2nd century AD. The main one in each area being the Roman Empire in the west, and the Chinese empire, or specifically the Han dynasty, in the east. While these two empires are thousands of miles apart and nearly one hundred years, there are many similarities between the two. The most significant difference between the two empires is the basis of government ideals.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two of the greatest empires in all of history, the Ancient Roman and the Han China empires are similar in terms of both creating great inventions still used today; however, they are different in terms of how their militaries were organized and their religious beliefs.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Augustus believed that power must be spread out and democracy should be the best form of government. He, “transferred the republic from my own control to the will of the senate and the Roman people” (Res Gestae 34). This gave the people more power to influence laws and made them feel more involved in Rome, in return his people were happier about how he ruled his kingdom. The First emperor of China was the only person who made decisions in china. Any rule or law passed was due to direct order from himself. This would often lead to misjudgment and unjust laws. “The First Emperor was greedy and short-sighted, confident in his own wisdom, never trusting his meritorious officials, never getting to know his people” (Sima Qian 8). He did not care about his people and would only look to better himself. This self-centered leadership resulted in hated for the emperor and many failed assassination attempts on…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shi Huangdi: First emperor during the Qin dynasty. He ended the feudal system. Expanded the territory of China south. Started to build the Great Wall to guard against invasions. Relied heavily on conscripted labor. Executed people that criticized him. Also burned books that weren't about agriculture because he didnt want people to be educated, he just wanted them to work in the fields.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Brian Blessed production of King Lear most closely resembles a Christian tragedy approach to the text in that it shows suffering as meaningful and links it with redemption. This view of the play accepts the disproportion between fault and punishment and sees death as a release from the world’s cares.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Weapons In Ancient China

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Roman soldiers were trained to become strong heroes for Rome. The soldiers were strong fighting men that were trying to protect their country. The Roman army had a useful type of weapon, the spear. They also had a spear shooter that was like a crossbow but bigger and heavier. It was called a Ballista. Roman soldiers did not have much armor for the whole body, they had more on their chest. Roman soldiers would take cover when shots were fired. Once the initial arrows flew they were free to go in for the kill. Daggers and any type of strong cutting blades helped back them.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays