Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Empires

Good Essays
825 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Empires
The Roman and Han Empires both had their differences and similarities. However their similarities out-weighed their differences by a large amount. Their governments, economies, traditions, even their ways of agriculture made them very similar but at the same time very different. A couple of things that made them similar are The Han and the Roman Empires was two of the most powerful empires to rule their respective parts of the world, however they both declined and failed. Another thing was that agriculture was the fundamental economic activity for wealth. A couple of differences were in The Han Empire; the merchant class in china was frequently disparaged and constrained by the government. The Romans were sort of a republic, where they got to choose their leader. Whereas to the Han Dynasty, power was passed down the family. One similarity was agriculture was a fundamental economic activity for wealth. For The Roman Empire the main crops of Roman farmers were various grains, olives, and grapes. Olive oil and wine were among the most important products in Rome. These farmers would take their crops to markets, sell them and gain their money. They also had to pay taxes, but the farmers didn’t always have to use money, they could pay partially with food as well. After building the great wall, China was in great depth from taxes. Looking down on merchants, china focused more on farmers to build their tax revenue and not only farming but trading along the Silk Road. Another similarity was that The Han and the Roman Empires was two of the most powerful empires to rule their respective parts of the world, however they both declined and failed after a period of time. The Han Empire dominated Asia from the Korean peninsula to present day Vietnam. The Roman Empire stretched from the present British Isles to present day Iraq. Augustus, the first emperor of the Roman Empire, brought order to the vast lands Rome had conquered and brought an end to over one hundred years of civil war. With peace came increased trade and commerce, and ideas traveled freely along the Roman Empire's well designed roads. However, the emperors after Augustus were not as a good emperor as Augustus. Four emperors and fifty-four years later, the Roman Empire was once again thrown into a violent civil war. The Romans gradually lost power, and people in the north frequently went on raids against the now falling empire. The Roman Empire became in debt as emperors tried to buy the loyalty of the army, and the moral condition of its subjects continued to spiral downward. Finally the Empire itself fell and collapsed. Both the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were powerful and impressive. They both fell because of weak leaders and power hungry individuals. However unlike the Roman Empire, the Han Empire was later reformed, not as an exact empire but closely related with the same customs. One difference is The Roman Empire was more of a republic whereas The Han Empire had power passed down the family line. The emperor was the head of the government. He was responsible for creating laws, heading the armed forces as its commander-in-chief and serving as the chief executive official. The Han dynasty’s imperial government system was patterned after its predecessor, the Qin dynasty. However with the Romans it all began when the they overthrew their Etruscan conquerors in 509 B.C.E. Once free, the Romans established a republic, a government in which citizens elected representatives to rule on their behalf. A republic is quite different from a democracy, in which every citizen is expected to play an active role in governing the state. A central control was established, meaning that the emperors had full control over all of China. The aristocracy dominated the early Roman Republic. In Roman society, the aristocrats were known as patricians. The highest positions in the government were held by two consuls, or leaders, who ruled the Roman Republic. A senate composed of patricians elected these consuls. At this time, lower-class citizens, or plebeians, had virtually no say in the government. Both men and women were citizens in the Roman Republic, but only men could vote. Another difference was in The Han Empire; the merchant class in china was frequently disparaged and constrained by the government. The Romans had greater opportunities for not only economic but social chances in life. The absence of government interference in The Roman Empire resulted in greater economic mobility and a thriving and influential middle class in the towns and cities. In the end both empires had their differences and similarities, and they were both powerful. The Roman and Han Empires have affected history and will have an everlasting effect on history as the world goes on. Influences on government, society, and ways of life continue in similar ways to those in these empires and I’m sure will continue throughout time.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Han China and Imperial Rome had some Similarities. Both Han China and Imperial Rome had very large empires that it was difficult to manage their boarders and often faced threats. Both Empires were patriarchal societies and kept women in low status with no say in political affairs. Both Han China and Imperial Rome were ruled by one centralized ruler. Both empires had standardized coins to promote…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whereas Han China from 206 B.C.E. to 220 B.C.E. and the imperial Rome from 31 B.C.E. to 476 C.E. had shared similarities on the territorial boundaries issues, the two empires had different political over the huge amount of land. Known as most powerful empires in history, Han China and Rome utilized idiosyncractic policy to maintain the sovereignty. However, the two states both suffered from the border disputes.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were different politically. The Roman Empire was founded on imported agriculture and didn’t have a set bureaucracy. While the emperor of Rome appointed some advisors the government lacked many institutions, such as a planned budget. Apart from the emperor and senate the Romans didn’t have other levels of government; because of this the farther reaches of the Roman Empire had more autonomy. The Han was founded on strict legalism and had a well organized bureaucracy. Even though the emperor had absolute power, institutions such as the Three Councilors of State and Nine…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While European Rome and Asian Han Dynasty China were unique civilizations in their own ways, they did happen to share a lot of qualities between each other. A couple of the similarities were their monarchy-run governments - both placed a single person (an emperor) in charge of the respective empire, both of them had were originally made up of many different kingdoms in their countries with one ending up controlling the rest, they both used lots of agriculture in their economies, and both Rome and Han China gradually deteriorated after long rules.…

    • 180 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Rome and Han China had some similarities and differences in their foundation. In the eight century B.C.E., Rome began as a small city-state on the western side of Italy. Originally they were a monarchy but in 509 B.C.E. they knocked off the monarchy and made themselves republic. In their republic system, the wealthy class, known as patricians, dominated. The lower class was called plebeians. The Romans had laws that protected the lower class form abuse. The Romans took great pride in their system, believing it gave them more freedom. With this political system, the Romans launched their empire, a process that took more than 500 years. The Chinese were not building a new empire yet they were restoring the old. The Chinese empire started as early as 2200 B.C.E. By 5oo B.C.E. the Chinese state was in shambles which they considered as the warring states, which were seven kingdoms within the Chinese government fighting against each other. China finally reunified in 221 B.C.E. Han China and Imperial Rome are similar because they both flourished at about the same time (200 B.C.E. – 200 C.E.), conquered about the same amount of land (about 1.5 million square miles), and had about the same population (50 to 60 million). The reason for the similarities and differences in the foundation in both of the empires was because Rome was a new empire while the Han dynasty was just restoring the old but they were still the dame due to their similarity in the time era both empires flourished, they occupied a similar area, and they contained a similar population.…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman and Han empires were similar in their falls because of they both fell to nomadic invaders. Nomads attacked the empires to try and conquer them. Germanic tribes attacked the Romans and the Huns attacked Han China. Because both empires borders were so large, they were unable to fully protect their borders making it easy for their invaders to defeat them.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both empires had problems with social in takes. The Han Dynasty had problems with taxations, peasants grew angry over the raise of taxes and revolved against china so they used the military to stop them but soon needed more soldiers so, the Han government forced many farmers and others to fight as well, generating a large group of angry citizens. The Romans struggled with religion more than taxes as Christianity spread through Rome officials…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since Imperial Rome and the Han dynasty were taking places at relatively the same time, they have many similarities. But considering the distance and isolation from each other, many differences also occurred. Both Rome and Han China used technology to improve their empire, but changing your social class rank was very difficult in China, but a bit easier in Rome.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although both Han China and Imperial Rome had large, long lasting empires with similar economies and some similar policies centralized governments and similar administrative policies regarding land reform, their techniques of imperial administration differed in terms of how it came to be and how emperors ruled.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Rome and Han China are both well recognized empires, known as strong and fairly successful. Although the empires had some differences they also had similarities in their methods of political control. Similarities between these empires include the belief that leaders had connections to God, religious tolerance, and public works provided to citizens. Along with the similarities in political control the differences include Rome having a democracy while China had a centralized bureaucracy, Rome had lesser domestic repercussions while China had harsh punishments, and Rome offered assimilation to become a citizen while China did not need to offer assimilation because it conquered states that were already chinese.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Collapse of Rome and Han

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are many major similarities of the collapse are Rome and the Han empire such as they were both invaded by foreign enemies, the corruption of the governments, and the weak leaders. There are also many differences between the collapse of the Roman and Han empires such as, the Roman empire fell because of Germanic invasions, and the Civil Wars. The Han empire fell because, power was not held by the central government, and uprisings of desperate peasants.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the empires lasted during the same time, they were located on completely different land areas. Rome had the Mediterranean, was hilly, with lots of rivers. Natural protections with their central location, and able to utilize their manpower resources of Italy. While Han China had rivers, plateau, deserts, mountains, was plain-fertile but needed…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China and Rome were two of the most powerful and popular empires of their time, but they fell like any other empire before them. Han China and Rome’s Empires had the same causes for their declines, but their effects are different.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some similarities of imperial administration in Imperial Rome and Han China include the general idea of equality, living under one ruler who gives the people some control, and the roles of families. Both empires believed in generalization of the people. Yes, they had one ruler, but everyone else underneath the ruler was made equal. Both Imperial Rome and Han China are controlled under one central leader.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome and Han China were classical civilizations that built centralized empires, which eventually expanded. Both Rome and Han experienced unequal land distribution which led to political instability, and both suffered from invasions of nomadic tribes due to political instability which would lead to the collapse. However, only the western portion of the Roman Empire collapsed whereas the entire Han met its demise.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays