Preview

Empires: Should There Be An Empire Or Emperor?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
992 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Empires: Should There Be An Empire Or Emperor?
Empire or Emperor?
An empire is a state, or political system that exercises coercive power over a population. Those with larger populations are more frequently labeled as empires. They conquer, rule, and extract resources from other states and peoples. Usually, empires encompass a considerable variety of peoples and cultures within a single political system. The negative things that come with an empire cannot be overlooked. Many empires are known by their violence, exploitation, oppression, cruel armies, and unforgiving tax collectors. More often than not, these empires impose their culture onto their subjects, making them assimilate whether they want to or not. In the pursuit of selfish ambition, many kings extract resources from other states
…show more content…
Some empires imposed peace and security upon their subjects. For instance, the Indian emperor Ashoka was a brutal ruler. During the beginning of his reign, he destroyed other nations through military conquests to expand his empire. However, after converting to Buddhism, Ashoka regretted his former ways and became more peaceful and tolerant in his governing. This is shown in the document “The Rock Edicts” (ca. 268-232 B.C.E.), which Ashoka wrote to give advice to future emperors and instructions about ruling with justice and peace. In addition, many empires brought people of diverse traditions and religions together, which stimulated the exchange of ideas, cultures, and values. When peace prevailed, empires promoted economic and artistic development, commercial exchange, and cultural mixing (Strayer 144-145, …show more content…
It was the largest empire in the world around the year 500 B.C.E., stretching from India to Egypt and governing around 35 million diverse people from varying backgrounds and cultures. Between 522 and 486 B.C.E., Darius was in control of the empire. According to Strayer, Persian kings were “absolute monarchs, more than willing to crush rebellious regions or officials.” For instance, once when a high-ranking nobleman interrupted Darius and his wife, Darius had the nobleman and his whole clan killed. Darius ruled with fear and an iron fist, and the empire imposed strict laws to keep the people in their control. Whenever a king died, the whole country was forced to mourn. The people were expected to shave their hair and cut their horses’ manes short. Any sacred fire in the land was to be extinguished. This type of control truly shows how oppressive the Persian rule was. The Persian Empire focused on building luxurious, grand palaces and buildings, canals and highways, and monuments to show their power. This model provided an example to later empires, for example, Islamic ones. There were 23 providences under their rule, and each one was governed by its own satrap. Lower-level officials also existed in smaller regions within each providence. Most intriguing was their system of imperial spies, called the “eyes and ears of the King” that filled the providences. Overall, the Persian Empire

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Persian respected the religious practices of other people in their society. The first kings tolerated everything because that was the key to succeed and grow the empire. Darius contributed to build Persepolis. He also set a currency and taxed everybody. Some people would pay him not in money but in different goods. Most of the emperors had their group of elite s that gave advice to the emperors how to govern their empire.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Persian Empire ruled from 559 to 330 B.C.E. Around 2000 B.C.E. the Aryans conquered modern day Persia. The Achaemenid Empire began with Cyrus the Great and he became a king beneath Astyages in ancient Persia. In 550 B.C.E. Cyrus took complete control over the Median kingdom. By 539 B.C.E. Cyrus the Great had conquered both the Lydian and Babylonian kingdoms. After conquering a kingdom he would “decapitate” the leader (not by beheading them but by replacing the existing leader with one of his choosing). Cyrus interfered very little with those beneath the leader which kept them happy and prevented them from revolting. Cyrus almost always honored his subject’s religion by allowing them to worship in peace and not destroy their places of worship. Cyrus the Great ended his reign in 530 B.C.E. Darius the Great ruled from 522-486 B.C.E. Darius expanded the Persian Empire into India. When not occupied by military endeavors Darius was a great administrator, he built extravagant capitals, introduced a standard currency, and extended the road network. Darius also organized a navy comprised of the Greeks and the Egyptians. Alexander the Great took the throne in 336 B.C.E. immediately following his father’s assassination. Alexander continued to follow his predecessors and employ tolerance for tactical reasons. By 324 B.C.E. Greece was the most powerful empire in the world making Alexander the Great the most powerful man in the world at that time.…

    • 1755 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Persian King Cyrus was part of one of the most powerful kingdoms leading after the “Dark Age”(textbook, p.37). His great ruling was primarily in Babylon but his ruling emerged all around the world; “(as to…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the research/analysis novel Day of Empire, the author, Amy Chua, discusses her thesis of how hyperpowers (empires or nations that had a command that stretched to all corners of the known world in the known world of their respective times) all rose to dominance through tolerance and fell in power through intolerance. Through the introduction and Part One, Chua effectively communicates how the various hyperpowers of history all rose in might through their effective and strategic use of tolerance and acceptance of the different people that came to exist under their control. She also explains how the mighty empires fell through intolerance and lack of an overlying figurehead to which the people could become loyal to. From her research, she is able to support her thesis with the history of the great empires described in Part One.…

    • 2008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Persia had 3 kings: Cyrus, Cambyses, and Darius I. Persia also had "governors" that were called Satraps. Also in Persia was the capital city, also known…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    An empire is a major political unit having a territory of great extent or a number of territories or peoples under a single sovereign authority. Two very famous classical empires were the Roman in the Mediterranean from 27BCE to 476CE and the Han in East Asia from 206BCE to 220CE. Both of these empires utilize the policies and practices of previous political governments to help ensure their success. Overall, the empires showed more political, economic, and social factors for their rise and fall than points of difference.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cyrus the Great ruled like no other leader in his time. He created tolerance for other people’s beliefs of religion, traditions and customs. This meant that he had more respect for people and more people respected his rule. With every city he conquered, he freed the enslaved people and allowed the people to worship and live as they please. For example, in Jerusalem…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Romans and Gupta’s emperor had the most control in their government because they did not use a large bureaucracy. The rulers in the Roman and Gupta Empire told their people their power was given to them by the gods so everyone would follow their rule. But the Gupta was not largely centralized so their emperor did not control almost all the power. Unlike Caesar Augustus and his successors who held almost all the power in the empire. The Roman emperors would put their faces on the coins or built statues of them all over the empire to promote their power so everyone followed them.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joseph Stalin Dbq Analysis

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Over the course of time, rulers are known as sovereigns who protect their empire as well as their people. They are required to sustain order, harmony as well as being content with their empire. Throughout history we have seen many leaders the good & the bad. Not all leaders were willing to listen to their people, as well as giving them what they want but some enforced their power and struck fear into their people. Rulers did many things throughout the course of history to show and acquire dominance across their empire, Louis XIV of France & Joseph Stalin of the Soviet Union are prime examples who used terror and manipulation to gain sovereignty of their empires.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | -empires included Sargon of Akkad, Hammurabi, Assyrian, and New Babylonian (Nebuchadnezzar)-kings, that normally ruled with local nobles-nobles were through birth in rich families; could not work way up-city-states to control public life within city walls and oversee affairs in surrounding agricultural regions-more cities than Nubia…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    City States vs. Empires

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With the advancement and development of city-states to empires, culture and economics changed drastically. The social classes of the two arrangements of civilizations were altered, but some factors stayed the same. In ancient city-states, councils of nobles usually governed and ruled. In the Greek city-state of Athens a democracy and ruling of the people was established. Numerous councils were opened up to the people of Athens, for their voices to be heard. As we moved into empires, social classes become more apparent with a ruler, or emperor, on top and other classes falling below him. In both organizations, there is some type of hierarchy leader on top, whether it is the emperor or the leader of the council or general in high office, such as Solon.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cyrus the Great was a brilliant and powerful Persian King that created an empire “stretching from the Indus River to the Mediterranean and from the Caucasus to the Indian Ocean” under his conquests. His governing and policies were different from any other and it helped create one of the largest empires in the world. Cyrus was truly a ‘great’ leader.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rise and fall of the Persian Empires The Achaemenid Empire Medes and Persians migrated from central Asia to Persia before 1000 B.C.E. Indo-European speakers, sharing cultural traits with Aryans Challenged the Assyrian and Babylonian empires Cyrus the Achaemenid (the Shepherd) (reigned 558-530 B.C.E.) Became king of Persian tribes in 558 B.C.E. All of Iran under his control by 548 B.C.E. Established a vast empire from India to borders of Egypt Cyrus's son, Cambyses (reigned 530-522 B.C.E.), conquered Egypt in 525 Darius (reigned 521-486 B.C.E.); largest extent of empire; population thirty-five million Diverse empire, seventy ethnic groups New capital at Persepolis, 520 B.C.E. Achaemenid administration Twenty-three satrapies (Persian…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    World History Paper

    • 313 Words
    • 1 Page

    Darius was “more important as an administrator than as a conqueror” because governing a vast empire is much harder than conquering it. The Achaemenid (another name for Persian) rulers had to preside over more than 70 different ethnic groups that included widely scattered regions, different languages, and a multitude of religious and cultural traditions. The Achaemenids established lines of communication between all parts of their empire and design a system that would allow for taxation and administration. By doing this, they not only made it possible for their empire to survive, but also created administrative techniques that would survive longer than their dynasty and influence political life in southwestern Asia for centuries.…

    • 313 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The word empire has a negative undertone. Countries no longer want to use this term to describe its history or its rise to an influential power in today’s world. This is also the case for the United States. The word empire is mostly avoided in describing the history of the U.S. The question is if the U.S can be seen as a modern empire in history.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays