The decline of collective bargaining since 1970s, as described above, has engendered intense arguments. To describe this trend is much easier than to explain it (Rollinson, Dundon 2007). Some say there is a certain reason mainly resulting in this decline while others emphasize the interaction of several factors. For example, Freemand and Pelletier (1990) solely utilize the changes in labour law to explain the decrease of unions during 1980s, arguing that the legal factors accounted for the ‘entire’ decline in union density in the period between 1980 and 1986. However, to explain the decline of collectivism, Metcalf (1991) disagreed the analysis above and noted that the focus on one single reason can lead to the ignorance of others. Further, some models were developed to assist in explaining this trend. One of these models is from Bain and Price (1983). In order to comprehensively explain the union decline, factors were divided into three
The decline of collective bargaining since 1970s, as described above, has engendered intense arguments. To describe this trend is much easier than to explain it (Rollinson, Dundon 2007). Some say there is a certain reason mainly resulting in this decline while others emphasize the interaction of several factors. For example, Freemand and Pelletier (1990) solely utilize the changes in labour law to explain the decrease of unions during 1980s, arguing that the legal factors accounted for the ‘entire’ decline in union density in the period between 1980 and 1986. However, to explain the decline of collectivism, Metcalf (1991) disagreed the analysis above and noted that the focus on one single reason can lead to the ignorance of others. Further, some models were developed to assist in explaining this trend. One of these models is from Bain and Price (1983). In order to comprehensively explain the union decline, factors were divided into three