Employee Relations - Discuss the political, economic, social and technological factors that have had the most significant influence on employee relations over the last 25-30 years.

The last 25-30 years has seen major changes in the context of employee relations within UK organisations. The factors that have had the most significant influence on these changes are political, economic, social and technological of which I will be discussing to identify what particular influences these factors have had on employee relations over the last 25-30 years. To do this I first need to define the meaning of employee relations, which can be defined as according to Rose (2004):"the study of the regulation of the employment relationship between employer and employee, both collectively and individually and the determination of substantive and procedural issues at industrial organisational and workplace levels." (Rose, 2004 p.8)There are a number of political factors that have had a significant influence on employee relations over the last 25-30 years such as the influence of the Conservative government from 1979-1997, which included a decline in trade unions, new acts and legislations put in place, and the emergence of the Labour government from 1997 to the present day which has also brought a number of changes to the employee relations context. The Conservative government has had a significant influence on employee relations in terms of changes to the legal framework of labour law. These changes involved the relationships between the employer and employee, the employer and the union and the relationship between the union and the membership. In regards to the employer and employee relationship the Conservative government removed any statutory rights of employees that had previously been put in place during the 1960's and 1970's. This was done in order to encourage flexibility as the government felt that the employee was much more in favour than the employer and that the employer was being faced with an unnecessary amount of pressure to conform to rules which in turn prevented them from taking certain actions or making certain decisions. Even though this did

References: ooks•Beardwell, J & Claydon, T (2007) Human Resource Management: A Contemporary Approach 5th Edition, Pearson Education, London•Boxall, P & Purcell, J (2003) Strategy and Human Resource Management, Handmills, Palgrave Macmillan, London•Farnham, D (2000) Employee Relations in Context, Institute of Personnel and Development, London•Foot, M & Hook, C (2005) Introducing Human Resource Management 4th Edition, Pearson Education Ltd, Essex•Rose, E (2004) Employment Relations 2nd Edition, Pearson Education Ltd, EssexJournals•Elbaum, B & Lazonick, W (1984) The Decline of the British Economy: An Institutional Perspective in The Journal of Economic History, Vol 44, No.2, June 1984, pp.567-583Internet•National Statistics Labour Market Trends [accessed on 19/7/08] [available from http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_labour/LMT_November01.pdf]•Department for Business enterprise and regulatory reform (BERR) "The 1998 workplace relations survey: first findings" [accessed on 20/7/08] [available from http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file11678.pdf]•Metcalf, D (1993) "Transformation of British Industrial Relations? Institutions, Conduct and Outcomes 1980-1990" [accesses on 20/7/08] [available from http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp0151.pdf]•Nickell, S & Quintin, G (2001) "The Recent Performance of the UK Labour Market" [accessed on 22/7/08] [available from http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/speeches/2001/speech139.pdf]•ESRC Society Today "Women in the Workplace: The Gender pay gap remains" [accessed on 22/7/08] [available from http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/PO/releases/2004/june/women.aspx]•Government Equalities Office (2001) "Women and Work: Challenge and Opportunity" [accessed on 27/7/07] [available from http://www.equalities.gov.uk/research/factsheets/women_and_work.htm]