Issue Question: Should Endangered Species be Protected?
Since the appeared of the first life on this planet, numerous species come and go, rendered extinct by natural changes in physical and biological conditions. Because extinction is a natural part of the order, if there are many other species still exist, some people might wonders why or what so unique about the endangered species that large sum of money and effort is spent in order to save and restore them (Why Save Endangered Species? 2005). Endangered species means a population of organisms facing a high risk of become extinct, because it is either in the number of small, or they are threaten by the changing environmental or predation parameters. According to scientist, 99% of the species that have once lived on this earth have become extinct, so some people think that they should just be allowed to extinct, since it is part of the evolution anyway. Yet, some of the many specific reasons to invest money and effort into actions to conserve species threatened by extinction include the benefits of natural biodiversity, ecosystem service, and contributions to medicine, agriculture, and industry. Protecting an endangered species can cost a lot of money. Believe it or not, the Pacific Legal Association, in association with Property and Environmental Research Center (PERC), released a study that shows the incredible cost of Endangered Species Act. Based on their research, The FWS state that the federal and state expenditures amounted $610.3 million but PERC reckoned that the actual cost is 4 times greater which equal to around of $ 2.4 billion. When sum up with the private cost of government spending, the total can easily reach or exceed $ 3.5 billion per year causing peoples to lost their jobs, businesses, homes, farms, and even their lives in order to protect the endangered species. Even So the Endangered Species Act has proven to be pretty penny and devastating failure as only