Preview

English Comparison and Contrast Essay

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
293 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
English Comparison and Contrast Essay
Tiffany Holub
Ms. Labarge
English block 2
November 17, 2011
Comparison/ Contrast Essay

Jurors Three and Eight, from the play “The 12 Angry Men”, have many differences, but they do have some similarities. Finding the differences between Jurors Three and Eight was fairly easy. Similarities were more difficult to find, but they were present. This paper will compare and contrast these two jurors This paragraph is going to tell three main differences between Jurors Three and Eight. One of the main differences is personality. Juror Three is dominant and strong, but Juror Eight is very concidering and laid back. Also, their judgment is very different. Juror Three is very judgmental, where as Juror Eight isn’t as quick to judge as Juror Three is. Their main difference is their opinions on whether or not the boy should have been voted guilty or not guilty. These are three main differences between the two jurors. This paragraph will show similarities between the two jurors. One similarity is they both at one point stand alone. Juror Eight is the first to stand alone, and then Juror Three does in the end. Another similarity is their stubbornness. They are both very stubborn when it comes to supporting their opinions. They are very straight forward when it comes to their votes, though; they do what they can to get people to vote right along with them. These are some similarities between Jurors Three and Eight. Now you can see the differences between Jurors Three and Eight. These two jurors are very different , especially when it comes to their personalities. Despite their differences they do have some similarities, which are stated in this essay. After reading this paper, you should better understand these two very different, but similar

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Juror 8 simply puts out questions and asks people to challenge their own beliefs. He is prepared to allow anyone to keep their own opinion without compromising his own.…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Juror #1 is easily frustrated and gets uptight when someone disobeys his authority. He was concerned with maintaining his control and keeping the proceedings formal.…

    • 336 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a crowded jury room, opinions collide as discussions about the innocence of a young boy are decided. The dark and foreboding storm clouds that hang over the heads of the jurors are beginning to lift as time progresses and new facts are presented. The two men that cannot put their personal emotions aside are juror 3 and juror 10. These men are motivated by their emotions rather than the evidence.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, Juror 4 undergoes a series of questions regarding his confidence that a young man is guilty of murder. From the beginning to the end of the play, Juror 4 gradually changes his mind about his initial vote, through the constructive discussions lead by Juror 8. Juror 4 moves from a belief that all legal witnesses are faultless to truly experiencing some sort of “reasonable doubt.” He is left with a clearer picture of the case, looking beyond his personal prejudices and biases.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the drama Twelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, there are twelve jurors to discuss and deliberate if the murder in the first degree is guilt or not. Because the verdict must be unanimous, twelve jurors have a critical thinking in their discussion and finally made the vote from eleven jurors vote for guilty to unanimous vote for not guilty. During the development of the voting, Juror Three is hardly to persuade because he has a serious prejudice to the murder. If Juror Three does not admit the murder is not guilty, they cannot settle a lawsuit. Therefore, Juror Three’s prejudice should be the key to get the final verdict.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Flaws

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Throughout the years of America, we had many juries during criminal trials to decide if the defendant guilty or not guilty. In the 1957 movie, 12 Angry Men shows the best representation of American jury system and how people change their minds. 12 Angry Men shows that personal feeling get in the way in their votes. The movie is about how 12 jurors decide the fate of young boy that persumed he killed his father, while during the initial vote only Juror 8 raised his hand not guilty. Then throughout the movie and script each of the 11 jurors for various reason change their votes to not guilty. The 12 jurors change their votes from guilty to not guilty through character flaws, positive personality traits, expertise on the evidence, and pattern of behavior.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After listening to the protagonist, juror started changing their original guilty decision one by one. This showed their willingness to change their stance having been convinced by the protagonist’s logic. Protagonist stuck to the practicality of the situation and logic in order to bring the possible flaws in the testimonies of the eye witnesses by reproducing the situations and verifying the possibility of authenticity of the testimony. In doing so, he influenced the…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As juror 8's campaign continues, and the seed of doubt planted into the "guilty" minded jury members is fertilised thorough the analysing of facts the reasonable doubt slowly grows in the jurors minds, the audience begin to create an understanding that doubt is an easier state of mind…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men Juror 3

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In a crowded jury room in downtown New York, opinions collide as discussion about the innocence of a young boy is decided. The dark and foreboding storm clouds that hang over the heads of the jurors are beginning to lift as time progresses and new facts are presented. One juror is not happy about this stay of execution and is holding fast his opinion of guilty. Juror three, the president of his business, refuses to alter his vote or opinion in any way. Still haunted by his own son, juror three verbally assaults the group with a forceful tone and a taciturn attitude. One of twelve, Reginald Rose created them all from the same pen and ink, and they could all be no more different.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Prejudices play an important role in a jury's decision. Explain the prejudices of three jurors and how those prejudices affect their voting.…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Imagine having to decide a young boy’s fate who is accused of murder in the first degree. This is the case in “Twelve Angry Men”, the prize-winning drama written by Reginald Rose. Some jurors address relevant topics, while others permit their personal “judgments” from thoroughly looking at the case. After hours of deliberation, the jurors reached the decision that the boy is not guilty, due to the fact of reasonable doubt. While few jurors are motivated by their respect and determination for the justice system, Juror 10 is motivated by his personal prejudice.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    English Comparative Essay

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Ralegh, Walte. "The Nymph 's Relpy to the Shepherd." The Norton Anthology of English Literature. 9. Julia Reidhead. Norton, 2012. 1024. Print…

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury Decision Making Essay

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It was found that jurors with previous experience of jury work were more likely to convict. This could be due to experience as well as the young jurors would be naïve and easily influenced by other factors. Also, the race of a juror was found to be a factor that could influence the decision made as they would be most likely convict defendants of a different race due to their prejudice against certain traits. Jurors with authoritarian personalities are more likely to convict due to their support for convention, police authority and their dogmatic approach. They believe in structure, law and order…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Juror 8 wants urges the others to be patient and to contemplate the details of the case. Points out the weaknesses in the other jurors. Paternal instinct to the accused due to the boy having a troubled upbringing. Changes the jurors vote.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How to add

    • 515 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Juror #8 had no problem standing up for what he believed in, and expressing how he felt on the case. Some of the other juror’s seen the inconsistency in the…

    • 515 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics