Not create the next generation
Firstly, they think that although people have a right to live any way they like but traditionally, marriage is between a man and a woman. One of meaning purposes of marriage is create the next generation and mutual them. Children are the fundamental of future society. And obviously only opposite- sex marriage can play the role of create the future generation. So they think that we cannot change the key point in definition of marriage to suitable to all lifestyles.
Not ideal environment for development of children
Secondly, they argue that children need both father and mother in their development and same sex marriage always denies them a mother or a father. The children are the best flourish when they raised by biological mother and father who are united in marriage. Some research point out that girls without father are higher risk for early sexual activity and pregnancy in teenage age. Children without mother will miss the emotional and unique advices which only mother can provide. As I have already said earlier, children are the fundamental of society so society should be created an ideal environment for their development
Encouraging for other type of marriage
Another argument against legalization for same sex marriage is that this will encourage for other type of marriage like polygamous marriage or incestuous marriage.
Let’s me explain two type of marriage.
Polygamous marriage is the custom of having more than one wife or husband at the same time.
Incestuous marriage is marriage between member within family such as father and daughter, mother and son or even father and son or mother and daughter.
They argue that if same-sex marriage is legalized because none of this is discriminated, the supporter of polygamous marriage and incestuous marriage will have the same argue: the ban of these types of marriage is also discriminated and these should be also legalized.
That’s all I would like to say about arguments against legalization of same sex marriage.
Now we’d like to open up discussion amongst the whole class to see what you think about this issue.
Sources:
1. http://gaymarriage.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=001607
2. “Does father Absence Place Daughters at special risk for early sexual activity and Teenage Pregnancy? http://gaymarriage.procon.org/sourcefiles/father-absence-special-risk.pdf
3. Love Isn’t Enough: 5 Reasons Why Same-Sex Marriage Will Harm Children" - http://www.nomblog.com/19953/
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
How is polyamorous family and same-sex marriage, families the same ? Can these two both demonstrate alternative families, with hopes of giving legitimacy to “non-traditional family structure?” Both groups are entwined with each other in the fight to alter family narratives, with the hopes of pushing the “ non-traditional” family structure to a nonconformity family. One, that is not seen as non ordain, or moreover, one that holds the same civil rights as the “traditional” family.…
- 547 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
vi. Polygamy: heterosexual marriage when individual of one sex marries several people of other sex…
- 1759 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The 1999 film, Office Space is contingent with both Marxist and Weberian theories in regards to the institution of work. In modern America, the general consensus regarding work is that it is a necessary evil—an obligation. Under the guidance of American capitalist ideology, the institution of work is not only a civic duty but a responsibility that society owes itself. Concepts from Weber’s The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism have a constant presence in Mike Judge’s film. As such, the main characters react to their alienation and exploitation with micro-level Marxist acts of revolution. This is quite obviously a Marxist and Weberian comedy and there are many ways to analyze the influential concepts of both theorists in the film,…
- 1102 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Throughout this opinionated editorial, the author tries to convince her audience that same sex marriage should not be legalized. She hopes to appeal to the readers of the Wall Street Journal by the use of facts, rhetorical appeals, and religious accusations.…
- 595 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
For the past thousand years, marriage has been recognized as the social union between a man and a woman. In most cultures across the globe, homosexuality was viewed with disdain and marriages between same sex couples were forbidden. Same sex marriages should not be supported because of the negative effects they will create on families and society.…
- 1126 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
To start with, supporters for gay marriage contend that denying a couple their preferred privilege to wed any individual regardless of their gender is unethical since they are prohibited from…
- 340 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Society sees marriage as a sacred act of commitment and believes that same-sex marriage will end the purity of such…
- 852 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Both authors have some similar perspectives on the same sex marriage topic; one of them being sociological views and the matter of same-sex couples. In addition, both Evan and Andrew believe that family and friends who support and understand gay couples have a major positive on same sex marriage. Both authors discussed that many gay or lesbian children are being raised in a non-gay environment and that has a negative impact on the lives of children. The differences between Wolfson and Sullivan’s viewpoints are that Sullivan emphasizes the individual citizen, and Wolfson emphasize the importance of same-sex marriage. Some people are still ignoring the fact that our society is changing and evolving rapidly. Same-sex couples have been suppressing their voices throughout many decades, and now they are ready to fight for their freedom and the right to be married.…
- 1257 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Gay marriages have been one of the hottest and controversial topics in our society. There are still problems concerning this issue of homosexuality and gay marriages. Same sex marriages are legal in Hawaii, but in all other states couples must be of the opposite sex to form a marriage. Hawaii’s decision to legalize same sex marriages is considered a milestone victory for gays and may cause a ripple affect for similar action in other states. Those who support gay marriages justify their position by the concept of love. These supporters of gay marriages feel as though gay people are being deprived of their right to love. Many people believe that gay people deserve the right to love and to take that love and form a marriage. These people believe that gays want to feel justified, meaning that as a couple they should be able to define their own marriage for themselves and make their own set of rules. Supports of same-sex marriages feel as though homosexuals are being deprived of their God given right to get married. They believe that arguments against same sex marriages are unconstitutional, and they simply do not justify a ban on same sex marriages. It is not the idea of two people of the same sex getting married that frightens people so much, but it is the thought of change and the fact that the federal government will redefine marriage to allow same sex unions. When people picture the results of same sex marriages, they see images of unstable homes. Everyone would probably agree that homosexuality has changed our society, and legalizing same sex marriages is not likely to be an exception. It would be an injustice to discriminate against a person if he or she were…
- 305 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Many feel that marriage is a heterosexual institution (Bidstrup). Their idea is that it takes one man and one woman to be legally wed. Though it may say this in the bible, religious freedoms in the U.S should allow people to choose to marry as they wish.…
- 1936 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
Those are marriages are strictly between a man and a woman and marriage is a privilege, not a right. In bible it is often quotes that marriage is a union between a man and a woman. So in the case of Baker v. Nelson, the Supreme Court of Minnesota found that “the institution of marriage as a union of man and woman, uniquely involving the procreation and rearing of children within an family is as old as the book of Genesis” (Gay Marriage - ProCon.org). So two couple of the same sex getting married is contradictory to that belief. Many Christian believers believe that it is morally wrong to allow same-sex marriage. These can be attributed to religious texts. Oppose group of marriage equality believe that marriage is a privilege and not a right. The classes that are protect under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 include “(1) a history of longstanding, widespread discrimination, (2) economic disadvantage, and (3) immutable characteristics… ‘Sexual Orientation’ does not meet any of the three objective criteria shared by the historically protected civil rights categories” (Gay Mariage – ProCon.org). Same-sex marriage contradicts nature. Two people of the same sex will never be able to marry because it is biologically…
- 1400 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Try to imagine life in a society that refuses individuals to marry who they love. Imagine people being around their partners, but not having the legal rights to call them their wives or husbands. The fact of the matter is one does not have to try to imagine this because this is the state of current society. People can argue about whether church and state should be separated, the banning of polygamy, and not legalizing gay marriage, but the major importance is the institution of love (Sullivan). Gay marriage should not be opposed, but embraced by society with joy. Gay marriage should be legalized in the United States because denying this right is unfair and unconstitutional; marriage is not about money or judgment of society, but about a couple’s love for each other, and it will help reduce or solve social problems.…
- 968 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
There are over 105 million households in the United States today and out of those households, there are over 1.2 million gay people living with same-sex partners (“Census on Gays in America”). This makes the proposed legalization of same-sex marriage one of the most significant issues in contemporary America. It is presently one of the most discussed reforms in law reviews and the American court systems. If legalized, it could be one of the most revolutionary policy decisions in the history of America, along with women’s rights, interracial marriage, and slavery. There are many people who are opposed and feel it is morally and ethically wrong and others who feel that same-sex marriages are acceptable. Prior to writing about this topic, I had no strong feelings toward or against the issue on same-sex marriages. After researching and finding out more information on the topic, I became in favor of legalizing same-sex marriages.…
- 1308 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Anna Quindlen and La Shawn Barber both believe that the overall structure that comes from a marriage is extremely important. They both agree that marriage promotes the common good by building families and raising children. Children are a major issue and both want what is best for them but who’s to say what is best for them. Barber beliefs surround the idea that homosexual parents would be incapable of raising a child and that by having two parents of the same sex will not allow the child to have the “proper” adult figures in their life such as have a father or a mother. Quindlen argues that by not allowing homosexuals to get married they cannot adopt children therefore those children cant receive any type of parental figures. They both also believe that the physical structure of society is extremely important and each side believes that marriage is major contributing factor towards it. This common ground between the two is the…
- 1185 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Eric Zorn’s newspaper article, “Change of Subject: The Top Six Arguments against Gay Marriage”, tells about six popular arguments against gay marriage, and explains how he believes each is not valid. Zorn wrote this article to persuade opponents of same sex marriage to agree that it should be legalized, and he informs about changes in our society and why he believes gay marriage should be one of these changes. Zorn is trying to tell how over time we have created and destroyed traditions and that gay marriage should be legal because it is harmless to society contrary to popular beliefs that it could lead to legalizing polygamy or that homosexuals have immoral behavior. The author’s bias is shown in this article to be pro same sex marriage because he believes it is not morally wrong because it does not harm anyone. Zorn also states in the introduction, “I 've been informally debating opponents of legalizing same-sex marriage for nearly 20 years…” (Zorn).…
- 811 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays