Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Environmental Determinism and Possibilism

Satisfactory Essays
582 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Environmental Determinism and Possibilism
Environmental Determinism and Possibilism:
Shaping and Reshaping Life Since the Beginning of Time

Possibilism and Environmental Determinism, both completely different in theory, and yet so very linked in purpose. Environmental Determinism is the idea that the environment shapes its inhabitants, and will --or will not-- provide for them to accomplish their goals. While Possibilism is the idea that mankind –for this example it will be routinely mankind and not another species—can accomplish their goal(s) because it is possible or could become possible with assistance, such as training, tools, equipment, specialized environmental gear, etc. These two ideas can be almost as conflict-ridden as Creationism and Evolution, with both sides of the fight drawing lines in the sand and rallying behind them. Hopefully the reader of this essay will find that Environmental determinism and Possibilism may have different theories, but are not so different when considered towards a problems beginning and ultimately its end.
Examples of Environmental Determinism could be tropical viruses that cannot flourish outside tropical zones, bananas and their inability to thrive naturally in Vermont, humans not being able to breathe under water, and amusingly: pigs not being able to fly. All of these examples are limited to where and what they can do because they cannot escape their environment, as it has shaped them as much as they it. Humans are a terrestrial species, meaning we live and exist on solid land above sea level. Our bodies have shaped themselves to this environment and we will shape the environment back to continue this trait, thus the chances of humans developing gills for water breathing are ridiculously unlikely without a decidedly massive environmental change and a possibly forced evolution to adapt to said new environment. Being concerned with environmental changes and the need to change or adapt, the theory of Possibilism comes into view.
Possibilism revolves around using what is available, and with ingenuity and/or technology making it accomplish what was previously impossible. Possibilism could be a skillset that “MacGuiver” used frequently, as he would accomplish great feats with the available resources and creativity. Possibilism for the previous tropical virus could involve mutations, or its hosts living in less hospitable regions –such as Siberia- but within selective habitable environments like hospitals and other areas that remained relatively temperate. Sometimes it is not about adapting to the environment and thriving, but surviving long enough until you can stabilize or at least live. Man was not made to breath water and live under the oceans, its currently impossible. Yet through the use of diving equipment and specialized living environments and vehicles, mankind can temporarily swim among the fish and live among the currents of the seas. Once the temporary assistance is not needed or has been fully integrated and is now a permanent art of the solution and the normal environments, Environmental Determinism will return and set the rules again until the next required changes.
Environmental Determinism can be viewed as a beginning, like creationism, where it shapes and molds its creations to the confines of the strict, limited or only environments allocated. But Possibilism is part of the problem solving portion, where the creation adapts to new environments or factors, failing or thriving until it ultimately dies or thrives under pressure. Those individuals and groups that survive and thrive, akin to the idea of evolution per se, will than pass on their skills to the following generations until a new factor arises and the whole cycle repeats again.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The recognition that human society is part of the environmental system and that this linkage can cause the effects of human actions to differ from their intent. Decisions are made in order to avoid unintended and unwanted…

    • 2138 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    geog257

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Quite often, environmental issues are discussed in terms of economic, political and/or social implications. Ethical issues, fundamental to the topic, are usually ignored. Failure to consider these issues is often understandable when the nature of pragmatic politics and economics is understood. Ethical positions are most often phrased as questions asking how we, as humans, relate to other humans individually, to other humans as groups, to other humans still to be born, to other forms of life and/or to entire sets ranging from ecosystems to the entire planet. Questions as to humans’ relations with nature are often raised as well as the relationship between technology and progress – for example, are gains from technological innovations mainly accrued by the wealthy and often at the expense of poor or dispossessed peoples? To what extent do technological innovations generate serious social and ecological problems? Is progress in meeting human needs always at the expense of nature? Is the biotechnology revolution in agriculture in the best interest of both humanity and nature? Questions such as these will be dealt with as our course proceeds during the semester.…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In chapter four of Brian G. Henning’s book, “Riders in the Storm,” he talks about sustainability and the different views on sustainability over the years. Sustainability, is not something that is only related to the environment it can also be related to economics and even politically. Sustainability in terms of the environment today is a term we use to describe how much of something we can use while still leaving enough for it to naturally regenerate back to the level it was a before. The task of sustaining the environment is not easy and is a challenge that humans need to take on to help future generations. Humans will need to think about what kind of character they have and their relationships not only to future generations but also other living organisms.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeremy Butman’s article “Against Sustainability” speaks of the personalization of nature in today’s society. He talks about Descartes and how his influence caused many people to retreat from worshiping God. Instead they begin to give his attributes to nature. Butman continues the article speaking of how humanity typically fears change. When we speak of sustainability we don’t talk about sustaining nature, instead we want nature the way we have become accustomed to. Humanity views nature as perfect, and as mentioned before even goes as far as to allow it to replace God, instead of viewing it as ever-changing. Nature is something that we are actively involved in. By continuing to call for the preservation of nature, Butman believes that we are…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The most important task in human history has been to find a way of extracting from the ecosystems in which people have lived, enough resources for maintaining life … the problem has been to balance their various demands against the ability of the ecosystems to withstand the resulting pressures. [Ponting 1991, p17]…

    • 3271 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Q: There are powerful arguments that there is no such thing as free will. But people in ordinary life tend to presuppose there is free will when they talk about people deserving good or bad treatment, rewards and punishments. Some kinds of rewards and punishments encourage good behavior and discourage bad behavior, so those make sense even if there is no free will. But what about punishments for crimes that are impossible to deter (like crimes of passion) or rewarding talents people can’t choose to have (like Olympic medals or Nobel prizes for science)? Do these practices still make sense if there is no free will? If not, how would it make sense to change our institutions?…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the first chapter, the author talks about how most people’s attention is on eye-catching images, instead of what is going on in the world. People care more about murders, airplane crashes, etc. instead of the exploding populations or the growth in the amount of nuclear weapons that exist. Because of this, our environment starts to deteriorate. The environment will continue to deteriorate, and such events will be out of control until the human race realizes just how selectively the environment persuades the human mind, and how the biological and cultural history determines our comprehension. The book is about fundamental connections to our past and how the human race can “retrain” for a new world of the future. The book’s intent is to help people from all walks of life, educators, decision makers, physicians, businessmen, etc., change the way they make decisions. People might begin to change and secure the human future if they understood the fundamental roots of the many problems we face. At no point in history, has the human race had the power to destroy its civilization and ruin a lot of the planet’s life-support systems in a matter of hours. Over the past three decades scientific evidence developed many forms of the nature of both the human mind and predicament, and has now pointed to the way to the changes needed. The evidence of this has been from many different forms of studies, including neuroscience, evolutionary biology, climatology, geochemistry, and cognitive science.…

    • 2059 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Every idea gives some food for thought and analysis. Determinism is very interesting, as well as being a very complicated topic. I think, determinists fail to prove one hundred percent that “everything is predictable, including the process of making decisions, and that a decision does not occur as a first cause but rather as a result of the predetermined criteria for a specific decision to be made having been met.”(4) Still, there is a lot of truth in their point of view. Even though, scientists have made many sensational discoveries about the human body and brain, they are still far from knowing everything. Determinists can only try to explain some human behavior, but fail to establish correlation between cause and event. I won’t be surprised that one day scientists will be able to explain why some individuals become criminals, and will be able to prove that an individual with some genes is programmed to kill, steal, or abuse, and is therefore not responsible for his or her actions. As it hasn’t happened yet, the “principle of justice” must be applied to all individuals who break the…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    No Impact Man

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An environment consists of the surroundings or conditions in which a person, animal, or plant lives in or operates. The environment is a home shared by every person on Earth and there is a duty, as a people, to protect it. Today, it is threatened by the actions of the people living here. The planet’s climate is warming, polar ice caps are melting, and the very existence of its inhabitants is at risk. A new kind of lifestyle must be adopted to cure the damage done thus far. People must use less energy, conserve nonrenewable resources, and minimize their negative impact on Earth. An example of this new way of living is that of Colin Beavan in his book, “No Impact Man.” It is a true story about the year he spent having no impact on the earth and living an entirely eco-effective life. Along with his family, he does so by minimizing his use of electricity, generating no waste, and watching every move they make to ensure his family makes no impact on Earth. Beavan is initially motivated by the global, highly publicized problems, his relationship with his family, and the guilt he feels for his lack of environmental action. Throughout the project, these motivations evolve and he is ultimately motivated by more personal, community problems, maintaining his new relationship with his family, and the guilt he feels about leaving the project.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that free will is true in saying, the idea that humans can freely choose their actions rather than all our lives being predetermined like the way determinist believe. Determinist think free will is just simply an illusion, and that our thoughts come from our background, and we are unaware as to which we strive no conscious control. As Sam Harris philosopher, claims that our thoughts and desires impose instinctive circumstances that define the character of your consciousness in that moment.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Brown, B.J., Hanson, M.E., Liverman, D.M. & Merideth, R.W., Jr. 1987. Global Sustainability: Toward Definition. Environmental Management, 11, 712-719.…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    It can be argued that human instinct is an ever evolving characteristic that is never always in sync with that of nature. Human’s have the ability and sometimes the burden to understand and comprehend what is happening to him and his surroundings. One thing that is consistent with Human instinct is that the level of understanding and the ability to adapt to one’s surrounding has both different points of views and attitudes towards what direction one should progress. What should the humans do to live sustainably?In Wendell Barry’s Getting along with Nature, Berry feels that change begins with the realization of interdependency between nature and humans. In The Tragedy of the Commons, by Garret Hardin, the population is the greatest evil facing sustainability. Hardin and Berry are the quintessential polar opposites in regards to their own personal perceptions, human nature, and faith in society but if we could meld these two minds then the idea of sustainability could become a reality.…

    • 2494 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the following essay I will describe my belief in Indeterminism and give the opposing view in Compatibilism. I will give reasons why Compatibilism has credence and then I will defend Indeterminism. When the question of free will comes to the mind, I agree with the concept of Indeterminism. The idea that a person’s choices and actions are not pre-determined through casual law; that random choices can happen and that the future is unpredictable. Indeterminism grants that some cause and effect scenarios happen, but it gives the person the ability to have a choice and to be responsible for that decision.…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinism

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to Sider and Conee, determinism conflicts with the concept of free will. Since all events have single or multiple causes and are also caused by a prior event, the existence of free will is questioned. If a person woke up one day and felt energized, there would be a reason as to why he woke up that way and not any other way. Perhaps the reason would be that he had 12 hours of sleep, or that he woke up to a bright, sunny day. Determinism tells us that not only is there a reason why he woke up well rested, there is also a reason why he had 12 hours of sleep, such that it creates a chain of causes that leads to a time before his birth. On the contrary, if he woke up cranky, there would be a different cause, but it would still be a cause to answer why he woke up on the wrong side of the bed. This chain of causes gives him no other choice but to wake up and feel energized that day, proving that determinism and free will conflict with each other.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Social Ecology

    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Social ecology is the conceptual principles for knowing the outcomes and relations of the diverse individual and environmental factors. Social ecology can be defined as the study of individuals within an environment, which have an impact on one another. It is believed to be the earth’s societies reflection upon itself, exploring, discovering, and considering its future (Gutkind, 1974). Factors of social ecology may include the infirmities of age, an increase of population, natural disasters, technology and the development of society. Within social ecology, it is essential to distinguish which people are unable to see the environmental crisis. This movement is placing all responsibility for destroying the world on humans as it is becoming overpopulated. There is no possible way of convincing all humans to change their way of life (Bookchin, 1995). However, rather have humans recognize and remove previous forms of power and destruction (Bookchin, 1995). The main standard of social ecology is the fact that problems arise from fundamental social issues (Dogan, Rokkan, 1974). These problems cannot be understood without acknowledging the social issues. The development, of certain technologies, social characteristics, cities and science all has caused a vast majority of problems to the earth, which leads back to humans.…

    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays