God - Good , Omnipresent , Omniscient
The longer I live on this Earth, the more I have realised that something is seriously wrong with this definition of God. War ,disease , death , destruction , hunger , filth , torture , crime , corruption and poverty are prevalent on this planet. Something is not correct and this cannot be the good work and if is this the best God can do, then I am not impressed by this God.
The presence of evil on this planet is the main problem to this definition of God. The earliest statement of this problem of evil was stated by the Greek philosopher Epicurus and is called the Epicurean Paradox.
Epicurus states that if a God is good and willing to get rid of evil from the face of this Earth but is still not able to do this simple task, then he is not omnipotent. If he is able, but is not willing to do that, then he is malevolent. If he is able and willing, then why is evil present on this Earth. If he is not able to and is also not willing to remove evil from this Earth, then why do we need to call this creature God ??? …show more content…
This is a deductive argument which claims to prove that God's existence is logically incompatible with the existence of Evil. The second form of the argument is called the Evidential problem of evil. This argument differs from the Logical problem of evil in that it doesn’t claim that God's existence is completely incompatible with the existence of