Preview

Epistemology Phil/201 Quiz

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1075 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Epistemology Phil/201 Quiz
Review Test Submission: Exam 3 | | Course | Epistemology-PHIL 201 | Test | Exam 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | * Question 1 | | | __________________ combined rationalism and empiricism, showing how both played a role in our understanding | | | Correct Answer: | Kant. | | | | | * Question 2
|
| Descartes deduced God from the concept of God itself, in order to justify the idea of the material world.

Correct Answer: | True | | | * Question 3 | | | Which of the following is NOT one of the suggested ways to respond to skepticism?Answer | | | | | | | Correct Answer: | Skepticsm has no valid points of concern, and should be rejected. | | | | …show more content…
| | | | | * Question 16 | | | The Mattrix movies serve as a modern day example of Descartes’ Evil Demon HypothysisAnswer | | | | | | | Correct Answer: | True | | | | | * Question 17 | | | John Locke affirmed all the following except:Answer | | | | | | | Correct Answer: | Causality, time and space, are merely categories of the mind. | | | | | * Question 18 | | | Sensus Divinitatus gives us perfect ability to know God.Answer | | | | | | | Correct Answer: | False | | | | | * Question 19 | …show more content…
| C. Doxastic Assumption | C. Doxastic Assumption | The view that I know that no one knows anything. | D. Unmitigated Skepticism | D. Unmitigated Skepticism | When mutually supportive propositions add to the positive epistemic status of each other. | E. Concurrence | E. Concurrence | The view that we have a duty to offer evidence for every belief we hold without exception. | B. Evidentialism | B. Evidentialism | All knowledge of the world begins in the senses. | I. Empiricism | I. Empiricism | A group of theories of justification which holds that one does need to have access to evidence to be justified or warranted about at least some beliefs; I may not know why I know, but I can still reasonably say I know. | G. Externalism | G. Externalism | Claims that knowledge comes through the use of reason. | A. Rationalism | A. Rationalism | Claims that we can have some knowledge or ordinary things, but not of metaphysical things. | H. Metaphysical Skepticism | H. Metaphysical Skepticism
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phil 201 Study Guide Lesson 10
    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Phil 201 Study Guide Lesson 10

    With this lesson, we begin a new unit on epistemology, which is the philosophical study of knowledge claims. In this first lesson on epistemology, we begin by examining the question “What do we mean when we say we know something?” What exactly is knowledge? We will begin with a presentation that introduces the traditional definition of knowledge. Wood then discusses some of the basic issues raised in the study of epistemology and then presents an approach to epistemology that focuses on obtaining the intellectual virtues, a point we will elaborate on in the next lesson.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phil 201 Study Guide
    • 2451 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Phil 201 Study Guide

    ~An attitude or approach to life that involves regularly examining beliefs to ascertain what they mean, if they are true, and what value they have. Could mean taking a course or reading philosophers, but is more than that. It is adoping a new habit as a way of life. “Plausability structure” term by Peter Berger, which means today’s messages are subtly embedded in our culture. We are adopting beliefs without much reflection.…

    • 2451 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rene Descartes Trademark Argument
    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Rene Descartes Trademark Argument

    It is not obtained through sense perceptions. This is a reason that supports his claim that finite substances, such as the human mind, are not capable of creating such a omnipotent, omnibenevolent, infinite, omniscient God. He goes on to claim that the idea of God is innate, a concept that is present, or “imprinted”, in the human mind from birth. Descartes strongly believes that innate ideas are the necessary things that provide a reliable basis for all metaphysical knowledge. The idea of God is clearly and distinctly perceived. Descartes does admit, however, that he cannot grasp the thought of God’s existence, but that he merely understands it. Due to his conclusion that God ultimately exists, he is now able to trust the external world with…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant's Critique Of Reason
    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Immanuel Kant's Critique Of Reason

    Kant states that objects of belief are based on a priori reasoning, that the idea of a maximally great and omnipotent God is an a priori idea about a supersensible reality in the world of the noumena. A priori elements of cognition are innate to reason, whereas a posteriori elements are derived from sense, and he argues that both are equally crucial for knowledge. A priori perceptions and concepts also provide some a priori knowledge. For something to become an object of knowledge, it must be experienced, primarily, as Kant argues, by the senses. He concludes that it is impossible to prove the truth about God or any other supersensible concept such as the immortality of the soul or the freedom of the will which belong to the world of the noumena as theses supersensible concepts are matters of faith and therefore objects of belief – it is a common error to employ a priori reason beyond the domain of the senses and beyond the facts of empirical knowledge. God is not a fact, as facts are given by empirical knowledge, observation and the…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    JTB model, Edmund Gettier, and Michael Clark's analysis of knowledge
    • 1699 Words
    • 4 Pages

    JTB model, Edmund Gettier, and Michael Clark's analysis of knowledge

    In less than two and a half pages, Edmund Gettier completely shatters the analysis of knowledge held for hundreds of years by epistemologists through counterexamples displaying that a belief can be true and justified, but not constitute as knowledge. Michael Clark attempts to fix these problems presented by Gettier by adding another condition, in which a proposition would not only have to be a belief that’s true and justified, but also be fully grounded. In what follows, I will argue that Michael Clark’s analysis does not assist in solving the Gettier problem.…

    • 1699 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rene Descartes's Argument For The Existence Of God
    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rene Descartes's Argument For The Existence Of God

    He begins his argument by examining weather or not we know anything certain about material objects. More specifically, if material objects truly exist outside of his mind. To answer this, he begins by considering the concepts of the objects within his thoughts and determining which of the concepts are distinct and which of them are confused. These concepts consist of firstly…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Rene Descartes's Argument Regarding The Existence Of God
    • 1952 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Rene Descartes's Argument Regarding The Existence Of God

    Descartes, in his third Meditation, conveys a powerful argument regarding the existence of God. The first concept that he outlines is that since every idea must be caused, and if he has an idea that he isn’t the cause of, then something other than him must exist. The next step of Descartes’s argument states that all ideas of material reality could have only originated within him, but the idea of God, a perpetual and flawless being could not have originated from Descartes since he himself isn’t perpetual and flawless like God. Furthermore, he goes on to state that the idea of God, could indeed only have spurred by God and not a human and therefore god exists. These points are the basis of Descartes’s argument that God indeed does exist.…

    • 1952 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Descartes And David Hume
    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Descartes And David Hume

    The human mind is a very intricate instrument. There have been many people that have attempted, and failed, to illuminate how the human mind functions. The pursuit for the solution to this question has led to the development of two schools of philosophy, rationalism and empiricism, dealing specifically with epistemology, or, the origin of knowledge. Two of the most famous philosophers of epistemology are rationalist Rene Descartes and empiricist David Hume. Rationalism is the idea that reason and logic are the foundation of knowledge. It states that awareness is instinctive, and that it cannot come from sources such as the senses. Rationalists theorize that people are all born with the foundations…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Timothy Williamson's Philosophy Of Mind
    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Timothy Williamson's Philosophy Of Mind

    Chapter two whose title "belief and subjective knowledge" discuss the natural of belief in knowing and its metaphysical foundations. It also argues the idea of dependent and independent mind. And it explains the difference between conceptual and metaphysical belief.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Skeptical Certainty
    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Skeptical Certainty

    What is it that I mean to say when I claim to know something? In general usage, the word knowledge has a comparatively low value as a threshold for acceptance. When using the word ‘knowledge’ in a philosophical context, however, it is necessary to delineate the boundaries of its definition. It is in this context that I will discuss knowledge in the sense that implies certainty as the level of confidence I hold in its ability to reflect reality. Hereafter I will defend the notion that certain knowledge is impossible, as delineated by the theory of skepticism, and conclude by asserting that certainty is an unnecessary quality of knowledge in non-philosophical use.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Turtles All the Way Down: A critique of Infinitism and Coherentism
    • 3556 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Turtles All the Way Down: A critique of Infinitism and Coherentism

    Before going further it is important to identify just what is meant by Epistemic Justification in this paper. For the sake of this paper Epistemic Justification will be focused on what I like to call lateral or “Dependent Justification”, though the importance of doxastic justification does play an important role; in this paper I will address doxastic justification as essentially being “warranted justification”. To clarify the distinction between Warrant and…

    • 3556 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Contextual Theory of Epistemic Justification
    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Contextual Theory of Epistemic Justification

    Foundationalism – "The theory that every empirical statement which is justified ultimately must derive at least some of its justification from a special class of basic statements which have at least some degree of justification independent of the support such statements may derive from other statements."…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Does Russells Argument Successfully Refute External World Skepticism? Essay Example
    • 2730 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Does Russells Argument Successfully Refute External World Skepticism? Essay Example

    Scepticism arguments appear in many different forms and argue different points, i.e. infallibility, certainty. The following is a sceptic's argument for infallibility:…

    • 2730 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is There Such a Diverse Mixture of Nonscientific Knowledge (Pseudoscience) That Claims That Their Own Brand of Knowledge Production Is the Most Powerful?
    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why Is There Such a Diverse Mixture of Nonscientific Knowledge (Pseudoscience) That Claims That Their Own Brand of Knowledge Production Is the Most Powerful?

    This knowledge of what the people hold is their claim of what they believe is happening. It may be in the field of science or pseudoscience. Science is what we believe is true but it is not, it is still then subject to modification; hence, we know it is proven by experiments, and evidences. Then here comes, pseudoscience, having the suffix “pseudo-”, meaning that it is used to mark something as false, fraudulent, or pretending to be something it is not, combining the words “pretending to be science”. Pseudoscience, is now what we sat “not science” because, the basic reason is, that it lacks evidence and it is put into a pattern of reasoning.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Examine the Case for Innate Ideas
    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Examine the Case for Innate Ideas

    A fundamental part of a rationalists belief is that we obtain knowledge in thought by just thinking rather than from experience, for these reasons the idea that we are born with innate ideas are crucial to any rationalist. In this essay I will explore the concept of innate ideas and the rationalist’s arguments to support the idea and also the empiricists ideas to argue against the idea.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics