The first article is about homosexual couples being treated unfairly and not getting the same rights as heterosexual couples. Although, I think in this article they are trying to scare you by telling you things about marriage and wills and prenuptial arrangements. These scare tactics can make people think that marriage is a bad thing, that it is just ran by the government or that people only get married to have the benefits. This concept completely loses the whole meaning of marriage and the tradition behind it. The articles premise are, there are a lot of benefits to getting married like privileged treatment under the law. On the contrary couples that are not married by law, no matter how long they have been together, do not have any rights, and do not get them because of their sexual orientation. Therefore the States are discriminating against homosexual people. They think it is not necessary to redefine the act of marriage and to make sure there are equal rights. They also believe that they are not discriminating because gay marriage is against the law. It does seem like they are trying to give marriage a bad reputation though, that marriage is controlled by the law a government run program. I think it is wrong that anyone and everyone no matter who they are or what they have done in life can get married to whom ever they please as long as it is to a person of the opposite sex. But homosexuals cannot get married to the loves of their lives? That doesn’t make sense to me.
I think gay marriage is a very touchy subject, and since I am young, I really do not know much about love or marriage, or even the laws about marriage. But since I am religious, I do believe in the traditional wedding that brings two people together under god. I believe when you get married to someone you are married to him or her for life, because if you are getting married it should mean you have found your soul mate. I know there are some people out there who never decide to get married, which is their own decision, but if those couples are of the opposite sex I do believe that they should not get the same benefits as married couples do of the opposite sex because they are choosing not to get married. I do not believe that it is discriminating by not giving them the same laws as married couples. On the other hand, I am for gay marriage. I do believe it is their choice and frankly it has nothing to do with me and gay marriage affects me in no way. I think you cannot help whom you love and who your soul mate is. Since I support gay marriage I do also believe that homosexual couples should have the same marriage rights as heterosexual couples. I do not think its fair that homosexual couples do not get to have the same benefits of being married and are being discriminated by the government because their State will not allow them to get married under the law.
The next article I read was, Gay Marriage is “unnatural”. This article was written by a Reverend that is a chairman of a California-based organization of some 32,000 churches. He starts this article off with a fact saying, “Opinion polls show that nearly eighty percent of Americans do not accept homosexual marriage.” He does not have a real source for this fact so it is hard to believe it is actually true. Since he does not have any credibility showing that this statement is true, it seems as though he lied with the first line of his article. His main premises for this article are that homosexuality is not generational and since homosexuals cannot reproduce they are putting an end to their generation. Also that homosexuality is a choice and you are not born with it. Therefore he concludes that homosexuality is unnatural. He also claims that churches cannot be forced to marry gay couples and that homosexuality is an oxymoron. He lacks any credibility in his article, he gives statistics and facts about gay marriage polls and what people think, but he gives no proof, which makes it really hard to believe what he is saying in true.
I do go to church and I am a religious person, so the only thing I can somewhat relate to in this article is when he talks about churches being forced to perform homosexual weddings. Individual churches that resist may be subjected to civil suits for sexual discrimination. Resistance may be used as a basis for denying them access to federal, state or local government programs. I think the church reflects the bible teachings. From my understanding, the church and bible do not support gay marriage. Religious dialog was written so long ago and I think that just because times are changing does not necessarily mean the bible should. Putting the bible teachings aside, I do believe that at all couples heterosexual or homosexuals should be allowed to get married, even if they have to do it in the courtroom. If a church does not want to allow gay couples to get married in it, I believe that is okay because of their religious believes. But I do not believe that gay marriage is unnatural. Like I said before, I believe that you cannot help whom you love and that everyone should be with his or her soul mate no matter what. Not everyone has to believe that gay marriage is right but everyone should at least respect other people and treat people the way you want to be treated. For a large percentage of us, gay marriage affects us in no way shape or form. I think the majority of people that are against gay marriage are either adults who were raised to think homosexuality is wrong, or very dedicated religious people. I think they are set in their way and are unwilling to change their views and opinions because they are stubborn and cannot except that times are changing and the world is not the way it use to be.
In conclusion, I do believe that both of these articles have different views on gay marriage but they both use some rhetorical devices to persuade people their way. There are some parts I agree with and some parts I don’t agree with. But over all I believe that gay marriage should be legal everywhere. I think the people who do not think it should be legal need to step-down off their high horse, think about how homosexual couples are being treated, and just learn to respect everyone no matter their choice of sexual partner. Like I have said before, gay marriage really does not affect me in anyway and the other ninety percent of the population (according to Reverend Louis P. Sheldon) that are not homosexual, are not effected either. I do not necessary think it is wrong to use rhetoric and persuasion to sway an audience in a certain way, but these articles definitely needed to be credible to their sources to make it more believable and truthful. Gay marriage will be a touchy subject for a long time, its just one of those things I do not think everyone will ever be able to come to an agreement on. I do think times have changed and gay marriage has definitely become more acceptable in today’s society. I hope to see one day that gay marriage is completely legal everywhere in the world and homosexuals are no longer discriminated against. Another indication that times are changing and our society is becoming more acceptable of gay marriage can be seen in many large corporations. The words diversity and inclusion are critical to the success of many large companies. In our world of social media and immediate access to data and information, discriminating against any class of people can be detrimental to any business. Many large US and multinational corporations clearly recognize gay marriage when it comes to company benefits and health care programs. In fact, many openly recognize, provide support for, and celebrate many of the subjects that were once taboo, including being gay, lesbian, bi-sexual, and transgender.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Please read “A Gay Man’s Case Against Gay Marriage” by Michael Bronski on pages 687–690 of your text. Then reply with your analysis of the rhetorical situation of the essay. What is Bronski’s reason for writing? What is his purpose and angle? Who do you think his audience might be? Finally, think about the writing strategies Bronski uses to achieve his overall purpose. Based on our discussions of commentary and argumentative writing, what strategies do you think he relies upon to present his position?…
- 179 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Judging by the title of this article written by Lisa Miller, readers would tend to believe that this would be a piece of work written to support the religious side of the war on gay marriage. However, when reading through just the first paragraph, it becomes apparent that the essay is actually contributing to the discrimination of the Bible. This instantly detracts from the author’s argument because this places a biased predecessor on the information to come. The author places emphasis on the fact that there is no reason why gay marriage should be illegal. Proving her essay to be void of valuable information, this author did not effectively and correctly present the facts on…
- 1339 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The first category discusses how absurd it is to assume that if gay marriage was legalized then eventually polygamy, incestuous, and even pedophiliac marriages would all have to be legalized. In the second category it is a reminder that the slopes can slip in more direction, so their theory could back fire and the slope could slip into more support for not only the LGBT community, but also for those who are mentally handicapped and those with sexually transmitted diseases. As the third category states slippery slopes in general are a bad idea and are illogical and the fourth category recognizes that states, “in addition to the aforementioned reasons, a distinction between gay marriages and polygamous and incestuous marriages can be made based on the concept of “choice.” This fallacy is extremely weak in any sort of intellectual debate because the tactic of it is to fly off into a many other situations that are, more often than not, ridiculous and do not usually relate specifically to the “top of the slope” issue, and this essay is a good argument showing the flaws in the slippery slope argument against legalizing gay marriage.…
- 998 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
heterosexual couples and how this would affect the country. In this essay, __ will be discussing…
- 1513 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
In his essay "Against Gay Marriage," William Bennett, a great spokesman for conservatives and former Secretary of education under President Reagan, maintains his conservative stance that allowing same-sex couples to marry would have a harmful and lasting effect on our society 's intrinsic values and, in his view, would stretch the "fragile" institution of marriage beyond recognition (409). Bennett, as the title indicates, presents a powerful argument "Against Gay Marriage." He argues that allowing gay marriage would change the meaning of marriage, the ideal of marriage as being an "honorable estate," and would have a large role in molding sexuality (409).…
- 1615 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
The freedom to marry is a fundamental right, it's an expression of emotional support and public commitment. The plantiffs, the gay and lesbian communiuty, argue that they deserve the "fundamental" right to marry their partner. The state of California wants to keep sexual activity withing marriages and because of Prop 8, same sex couples are permitted to engage in any sexual activity. However, same sex couples are allowed to adopt children. Plantiffs want to have the state recognize their relationships. The Equal Protection Law of the fourtheenth ammendment states that "no state deny any person within its jurisdiction." Evidence at the trial shows that marriage in the US traditionally…
- 893 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Throughout this opinionated editorial, the author tries to convince her audience that same sex marriage should not be legalized. She hopes to appeal to the readers of the Wall Street Journal by the use of facts, rhetorical appeals, and religious accusations.…
- 595 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In summary, this online seminar entitled Unequal Treatment presented by Brian Smedley, Michell Van, and Linda Rae Murray was about the health disparities in the United States. During his presentation, Brian mentioned that the minority group have the worst health outcome compare to White people due to unequal access, and poor-quality care. Despite the introduction of the Affordable Care Act that has allowed many uninsured to have health insurance, people of color, especially African- Americans, still have the highest rate of insurance compare White Americans. Even those who have health coverage among the minority still facing other barriers, including economic, cultural, geographic, and linguistic that stop them to have access to a proper care.…
- 403 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The topic of same sex marriage is one that causes great debate in today’s society. There are many views on weather it should or should not be allowed and the effects it could have on the United States if it were allowed. The debate has been an ongoing one and as more states begin contemplating legalization the debates have become more heated. In an article written by Katha Pollitt, entitled What’s Wrong with Gay Marriage? , she argues for the legalization of same sex marriage making a multitude of valuable points. In an opposing article entitled Gay “Marriage”: Societal Suicide by Charles Colson her argues in opposition against same sex marriage using statistics and history to make his valid points. Both writers argue their points exceptionally but Pollitt’s essay is the better one as it is incredibly fair and reasonable and argues the opposition’s points perfectly.…
- 563 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Supreme Court applied Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to law enforcement in 1972. Agencies could be sued for discriminating against qualified women. In some cases, the courts issued consent decrees which forced agencies to hire qualified women. Many law enforcement agencies used height and weight limits to prevent women from meeting the qualifications until the courts struck down this practice in 1977 in Dothard vs.…
- 4057 Words
- 17 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Synopsis: The article is written by former US President Bill Clinton who in 1996 signed the Defense of Marriage Act which stated that marriage is defined as being between Man and Woman. What this means for gay couples is that they cannot enjoy the benefits that heterosexual couples have such as the ability to file taxes jointly, equal family benefits when it comes to pensions and health care and other federal statuses (Clinton 2013). While same-sex marriage is legal is several states it is not recognized by the Federal Government due to the DOMA. Bill Clinton who originally signed it states that he no longer supports it and says that “DOMA and opposition to marriage equality are vestiges of just such an unfamiliar society” (Clinton 2013). While he was signing DOMA he made sure to make the statement that it should not be taken as an act of discrimination and now 17 years later in 2013 he admits that the law itself is discriminatory and that it should be overturned in court.…
- 1093 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
There are many controversies surrounding today's world, such as abortion, animal testing, and social reform issues. It seems that no one can come to a common agreement on the legitimacy of these topics. Personal characteristics, such as upbringing, culture, religion and ethnicity, all play a role in determining one's feelings on a given controversial issue. However, one of the most protested and discussed issues in current political debate is same-sex marriage. There is no right or wrong answer to this question, only hard pressed arguments expressing speculation regarding supposed outcomes, benefits and possible tribulations that would come along with the endorsement of gay marriage. Such ideas are shown in pieces of writing by Manuel A. Lopez, in "The Case Against Gay Marriage" and by Scott Bidstrup in " Gay Marriage: The Arguments and Motives." These issues both discuss and contend common controversy surrounding the gay marriage debate. After reading and analyzing each essay, it is observed that Manuel A. Lopez' style of writing and literary tone give him the upper hand in establishing a more effective piece.…
- 1492 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Whether an individual is against gay marriage or for it, we all have an opinion on the issue. Andrew Sullivan’s describes how marriage as a basic need for individuals no matter their sexual orientation. However, William Bennett believes that “same- sex marriage would do significant, long term social damage” (1138). Whether we like it or not gay marriage influences marriage institution, culture, and their children.…
- 687 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Gay marriages have been one of the hottest and controversial topics in our society. There are still problems concerning this issue of homosexuality and gay marriages. Same sex marriages are legal in Hawaii, but in all other states couples must be of the opposite sex to form a marriage. Hawaii’s decision to legalize same sex marriages is considered a milestone victory for gays and may cause a ripple affect for similar action in other states. Those who support gay marriages justify their position by the concept of love. These supporters of gay marriages feel as though gay people are being deprived of their right to love. Many people believe that gay people deserve the right to love and to take that love and form a marriage. These people believe that gays want to feel justified, meaning that as a couple they should be able to define their own marriage for themselves and make their own set of rules. Supports of same-sex marriages feel as though homosexuals are being deprived of their God given right to get married. They believe that arguments against same sex marriages are unconstitutional, and they simply do not justify a ban on same sex marriages. It is not the idea of two people of the same sex getting married that frightens people so much, but it is the thought of change and the fact that the federal government will redefine marriage to allow same sex unions. When people picture the results of same sex marriages, they see images of unstable homes. Everyone would probably agree that homosexuality has changed our society, and legalizing same sex marriages is not likely to be an exception. It would be an injustice to discriminate against a person if he or she were…
- 305 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
I have lived in Durham County forty 42 ½ years of my life and 2 ½ years in Granville County and has had the same thought for all that time. I’ve never thought of any theory to be right besides Religious Ethics. None of my life I paid attention to any other theory besides Divine Command Theory until I took this course. I was satisfied with just believing there was no way possibly another theory could come close to Divine theory. I researched and read other people opinions and I have to think about other people feelings as well. I found that I was being judgmental on my topic of Same-sex marriage. I started trying to think like homosexuals and asked myself would I want to be treated like this? I decided to ask some Gay people questions on why they were this way. As it turns out, a lot of gay people said they couldn’t help it, especially men; some women stated that they were scarred in a heterosexual marriage or relationship and turned to women instead. There were others that stated that they were molested and was confused about their identity. Almost to my disbelief, all of these people I interviewed were in the church. Most served on a ministry in the church and was very much into Christ. Throughout this semester I will be addressing the issue of Same-sex marriage. The existence of Same-sex marriage raises a moral dilemma. A moral dilemma is “a situation in theory or practice which forces an individual or group to choose between two equally important values, and whichever side one chooses they lose something” (Mundia, 2005). The moral dilemma in this case puts two values at odds. In order to help others we must not judge them and think our way is the only way. Virtue Ethics and Natural Law Theories would not support same sex marriage. Care Ethics would select same-sex marriage. The moral dilemma that arises in this practice is that most younger adults thinks that same-sex marriage is okay and majority of older adults don’t think…
- 494 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays