Preview

Equity and Trust

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4043 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Equity and Trust
Introduction

The equitable maxims provide a set of general principles which can be said to have influenced the development of equity. This gives an overview of a selection of these maxims, examining them in varying amounts of detail and identifying many of the particular areas of the law which have been affected, and which are dealt with later in the book. These include, for example, the maxim ‘where the equities are equal the first in time prevails’, and its effect on priorities and conflicting interests, and the maxim ‘equity acts in personam’ and its effect on the operation of the law outside the jurisdiction. This maxim means that when individuals are required, by their agreements or by law, to perform some act of legal significance, equity will regard that act as having been done as it ought to have been done, even before it has actually happened. This makes possible the legal phenomenon of equitable conversion. Sometime this is phrased as "equity regards as done what should have been done". The consequences of this maxim, and of equitable conversion, are significant in their bearing on the risk of loss in transactions. When parties enter a contract for a sale of real property, the buyer is deemed to have obtained an equitable right that becomes a legal right only after the deal is completed.

MAXIMS OF EQUITY DEFINITION

A set of general principles which are said togovern the way in which equity operates, illustratingthe qualities of equity.• In contrast to the common law, maxims are moreflexible, responsive to the needs of the individualand more inclined to take account of the parties’conduct and worthiness.• None of the maxims is in the nature of a bindingrule.
Where there is a right there is a remedy. This idea is expressed in the Latin Maxim ubi jus ibi remedium. It means that no wrong should go unredressed if it is capable of being remedied by courts. This maxim indicates the width of the scope and the basis of on which



Bibliography: Books 1.    Maxims in Law and Equity: Comprising Noy 's Maxims, Francis 's 2.    The Principles of Equity and Trusts, Graham Virgo 3.    Equity and trusts , Alastair Hudson Web pages 1.    http://www.slideshare.net/AhmadFarouqAmir/maxims-of-equity-12621279 2.    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxims_of_equity 3.    http://notes-law.blogspot.com/2008/08/maxims-of-equity.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    This paper examines the development and scope of accessory liability under the second limb of Barnes v Addy as it stands in both England and Australia. As to the law in England, the focus will be on the rearticulation of the principle of accessory liability under the second limb as stated in Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan. In particular, it will consider the extent to which the decision has reconciled inconsistencies in earlier authority and remedied those issues propounded to be inherent in the traditional formulation of the principle. At this stage, this traditional principle remains good law in Australia. However, as suggested in Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd, there is potential for the English approach to be adopted in the Australian context. Such an adoption may be advisable in light of the judicial and extra-judicial commentary suggesting that the orthodox approach is in fact not properly aligned with equitable principles. The discussion of this possibility involves not only an assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, but also a determination as to the extent to which the separate application of each approach could result in a divergent outcome.…

    • 3483 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    d) The difference between legal and equitable remedies: courts will not grant equitable remedies unless the remedy at law – monetary damages – is inadequate. If a person that is buying land from a seller and the seller breeches the agreement, the person buying the land may sue the seller for the return of any deposits or down payments that might have been paid on the land, but this not the remedy the buyer actually seeks. What the buyer actually seeks is to have the court order the seller to perform the contract. In other words, the buyer wants the court to grant the equitable remedy of specific performance because monetary damages are inadequate in this situation.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Common Law Dbq

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Equity was developed over centuries but initially as a reaction to the “harshness of the common law or lack of developments in common law”. Furthermore, the common law system went unchanged for centuries and was a system were petitions were presented to the King for his grace in some complaint where “the usual royal answer was let him sue in common law”. In addition, complainants often complained about officials in respect of misconduct and unfairness.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Maxim refers to a principle or reason. This is saying that the moral worth is depending upon the reason for which one performs the action. In the grocery store example, the moral worth of his act to be fair to all the customers is moral because by the goodness of it being a moral law or duty, not by what it will bring oneself. The only maxims or principles that can be one are that which everyone agrees upon including oneself. If everyone acts on that maxim then the action itself has moral worth. The action has to be a universally agreed upon. One must ask themselves if this could be a law for everyone. If this is true then one’s action indeed has moral worth.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his article ‘Equitable Rights of Cohabitees’ Hayton suggested that the distinction between common intention constructive trusts and proprietary estoppel has, over time, come to be but illusory and goes on further to propose that since the general direction of the development of the law has been to embrace the principle of preventing and remedying unconscionable conduct regardless of whether the claim brought before them was originally brought under the concept of a constructive trust or proprietary estoppel, the distinction between the two legal tools should be altogether abolished. The scholar suggests that this would further promote the equitable principle of remedying unconscionable conduct. As Lord Browne-Wilkinson put it, ‘the two principles have been developed separately without cross-fertilization between them: but they rest on the same foundation and have on all the matters reached the same conclusions”.…

    • 1984 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Choithram and Pennington

    • 2319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The following is a supplement to the discussion of the Milroy v Lord and Re Rose principles in Equity Trusts relating to the cases of T Choithram International SA v Pagarani 2001 2 All ER 492 and Pennington v Waine 2002 4 All ER 215. These cases confirm the existing law for the most part, although in factual circumstances which have occasioned comment by some jurists. The Underlying Principle in Milroy v. Lord An imperfect gift will not be perfected simply by interpreting the donor to be a trustee of the property which was to have been the subject matter of that gift, nor will an incompletely constituted trust be rendered effective so as to aid a volunteer in neither case will equity perfect an imperfect transfer of property. That much was made evident in the judgment of Turner LJ in Milroy v Lord . Turner LJ expressed this principle in terms that for a settlement to be effective the settlor must have done everything which, according to the nature of the property comprised in the settlement, was necessary to be done in order to transfer the property and render the settlement binding upon him. The rigour of this principle that equity will not assist a volunteer by perfecting an imperfect gift appears to have been diluted by a statement of Lord Browne-Wilkinson to the effect that although equity will not aid a volunteer, it will not strive officiously to defeat a gift. The Re Rose principle In Re Rose (1952), the registered owner of shares executed two share transfers, one in favour of his wife absolutely by way of gift and the other in favour of two people (including his wife) on trust. The shares were in a private company, which empowered the board of directors to object to the transfer of shares. The transferor had completed all the formalities required of him only ratification by the board of directors remained before the transfer was complete. The date of transfer was again important so that Roses estate could demonstrate that the voluntary transfer had…

    • 2319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, when discussing natural rights identifying the diversity and the advantage that comes from different outcomes of equality in an almost completely unbiased environment. As for moral principles, one being, everyone should work, play, and stay in an environment free of derogatory statements and racial slurs or insults. Likewise, another is to treat people nicely like the way one wants treatment. Lastly, we are all created equally yet just at different measure for each other. If the mathematics is correctly done on the aptitude of each other we are not inequalities which are a relation that holds between two values when they are different, we just end up with differing solutions because there is no such thing as absolutes.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: 1) Strickland v Aldridge 1804 9 Ves 516 cited in Re Boyes (1884) 26 Ch D 531, Reading 7 - Resource Book 4 Units 23 - 32 - W301: Law: Ownership & Trusteeship - rights & responsibilities, The Open University, Milton Keynes 2) Re Snowden 1979 3 All ER 172 in Moffat, G. Trusts Law - Text and Materials (3rd Edition, 2002) pg.129, Butterworths/LexisNexis. 3) Ottaway v Norman (1971) 3 All ER 1325 quoted in Moffat, G. Trusts Law - Text and Materials (3rd Edition, 2002) pg.114, Butterworths/LexisNexis. 4) Margulies v Margulies and others [2000] All ER (D) 344 found online using ixquick. 5) Re Boyes (1884) 26 ChD 531 - Reading 7 - Resource Book 4 Units 23 - 32 - W301: Law: Ownership & Trusteeship - rights & responsibilities, The Open University, Milton Keynes 6) Re Keen 1937 Ch 236 Moffat, G. Trusts Law - Text and Materials (3rd Edition, 2002) pg.114, Butterworths/LexisNexis. 7) Wallgrave v Tebbs 1855 2 K & J 313 in Hayton, D. J. Hayton & Marshall Commentary and Cases on The Law of Trusts and Equitable Remedies (11th Edition, 2001) pg.107, Sweet & Maxwell, London 8) Moss v Cooper 1861 1 John & H 352) cited in Moffat, G. Trusts Law - Text and Materials (3rd Edition, 2002) pg.114, Butterworths/LexisNexis. 9) Wills Act 1837 in Moffat, G. Trusts Law - Text and Materials (3rd Edition, 2002) pg.113, Butterworths/LexisNexis. 10) Blackwell v Blackwell 1929 AC 318 (HL) in Hayton, D. J. Hayton & Marshall Commentary and Cases on The Law of Trusts and Equitable Remedies (11th Edition, 2001) pg.111, Sweet & Maxwell, London 12) Re Edwards 1948 Ch 440 - can 't figure where I found this case, perhaps found online?…

    • 2784 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fusion Fallacy

    • 2529 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Two jurisdictions of law exist in Australia: equity and common law. ‘Equity is ‘the body of law developed by the Court of Chancery in England before 1873. Its justification was that it corrected, supplemented and amended the common law. It softened and modified many of the injustices at common law, and provided remedies where, at law, they were either inadequate or non-existent.’[1] Common law is ‘the unwritten law derived from the traditional law of England as developed by judicial precedence, interpretation, expansion and modification.’[2] The complete fusion of these jurisdictions has not yet occurred. The two “streams” of jurisdiction have merged in some areas as the law has developed, but are technically still separate. This essay will prove this claim using the equitable doctrines of estoppel and fiduciary obligations and will then discuss remedies.…

    • 2529 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kantian Ethics

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first property is that the maxim could be formed into a universal law of nature, i.e. if all rational beings follow that maxim, it would not contradict itself. The second property would be to decide if you would be willing to live in a world where that maxim is followed universally.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Three Certainties

    • 6499 Words
    • 26 Pages

    Knight v. Knight (1840); + Lord Langdale - To be valid as a trust there must be:…

    • 6499 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Symbolic Interaction Theory

    • 2379 Words
    • 10 Pages

    4. Exchanges that occur have to be fair and must have equity. Both partners feel uneasy in an inequitable…

    • 2379 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Foundations of Law

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Over the course of many centuries, theorists and philosophers had come up with several different justifications to explain an unclear relationship that exists between law and justice. Thomas Aquinas, a thirteenth century theorist, enlightened everyone with his opinion about this relationship when he wrote Treatise on Law. Breaking down law into four different types, eternal, natural, divine, and human law, Aquinas created an order of laws that society must follow in order to be just. There are also four elements of the law that ought to be pursued in order for there to be a just law. Laws must be created by the leader of the community, are reasonable for the common good, and are known by everyone to be just. According to Aquinas, “laws have binding force insofar as they have justice. Things are just because they are right according to the rule of reason” (Aquinas 47). Understanding Aquinas’ reading, law and justice are connected with one another through natural law. Laws have the power to bind a community only if they are just. Unjust laws are not laws according to Aquinas.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    From Warren Buffett’s perspective, “intrinsic value is assessed as the present value of future expected performance” (Bruner, Eades, & Schill, 2010): in order to determine whether the investment is worth and is therefore fairly operating on the principle of achieving value for this investment. The displays volatility in earning corresponding to the fluctuation of prices will give investors the cheapest price when the investment shown by the discounted-flows-of-cash calculation.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aequitas

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Describe and account for the historical development of equity and consider (think about) the contemporary (existing) significance (implication) of equitable principles.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics