Preview

Eric Foner And His Claim: The South's Inner Civil War

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
305 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Eric Foner And His Claim: The South's Inner Civil War
APUSH Name: ________________________
“The South’s Inner Civil War” by Eric Foner

Claim: The Confederacy was increasingly divided against itself. White society after the war was transformed no less fully than black society.

As you read the article, list the evidence Foner uses to support his claim.

Evidence:
Much of Tennessee was against succession but was forced into it by their leaders saying it was null and void.
Much of Tennessee helped the union in the war effort. Even helping burn down their own bridges.
31000 white Tennesseans joined the union army
Winton County in a confederate state withdrew from the confederacy and joined the union.
Almost all of Georgia’s Rabun

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This book focuses on the of number southern black and white who opposed the confedecy. He documented in The Road to Disunion, that anti-Confederates got strength from the weakness of slavery in the Border South, while slavery stunted population growth. The author argues that the varying support of the upper and lower South contributed to the fall of the Confederacy placing most of the blame on anti confederalist. He states that anti-Confederate whites undermined the Confederacy by remaining outside the nation while slaves unified form within and enlisted into the Union Army. Both groups guaranteed that the Union would have more men for the army which cause the Confederacy to lose because anti-Confederates waged war against Confederate southerners. That author also discusses the neutrality of the border slave states that made the Confederate war effort vulnerable. Losing nearly half of the slave states neutrality and the support for the Union army's invasion damaged the geography and population that the Confederacy could use for its defense.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the spring of 1862, angry men who opposed Matt Creighton’s son, Bill, burned down his barn. Now, the majority of people thought this was unjust and cruel; however, others think it was the right thing to do. Matt Creighton’s barn should not have burned down. Matt is currently sick and can barely do daily tasks such as cleaning or feeding the animals. On top of that, his barn is now gone and has to be rebuilt. What has this man done that was so evil that this accident has happened to him? Did this all happen just because one of his children is in the Confederate army? Matt has many boys serving in in Union army and one died for the Union. Just because one son is in the Confederate army does not mean that Matt is a bad man…

    • 231 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Tennessee is a general overview of the tactics used in and the battles fought in Tennessee and they’re importance. The book also discusses some of the problems both the Union and Confederates faced during this bloody war.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analyze the events leading up to the Civil War from the perspectives of both the north and the south. Be sure to discuss both on the eve of war in regards to politics, culture and economics.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After some of the southern states had begun to secede, the Confederate soldiers started taking over federal establishments, including forts. Fort Sumter was a federal fort located in the harbor of Charleston, South Carolina.…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Why the North Won the Civil War, Henry Steele Commager believed that there were multiple causes that led the confederacy to their defeat and that it was “an inevitability in history.” While many historians believed the North won due to their economic, military, diplomatic, and social aspects, Richard N. Current stated that the Union won the Civil War due to their “fundamental economic superiority.” He believed the North sustained a vast and overwhelming economic superiority in men and materials, giving them “an advantage of almost five to two” in everything. The Union succeeded because they were productive with their economy, unlike the Confederates.…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Radicals, Moderates and Conservatives united against Southern resistance through the creation of these amendments. This unification because of violence like the massacre in Tennessee would have occurred despite the absence of Andrew Johnson (Prince pgs, 15, 78-79). In contrast, Lincoln would have supported the Republican desire for federal military intervention in the south through the Reconstruction Acts. His previous orders to execute confederate prisoners for the murder of Union soldiers shows Lincoln would not have tolerated these acts of violence like President Johnson (CP pg, 235). In spite of supporting the compromises of his fellow Republicans, Lincoln would not have supported the radical confiscation and redistribution of land. Government seizure of rebel land would violate the Fifth Amendment and the concept that U.S. citizens were not responsible for a relatives…

    • 2382 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shortly after the War of 1812 had ended under Madison’s reign, America had come to a period popularly known as the “Era of Good Feelings.” The Americans had just come out of a great battle, emerging victorious, thus proving themselves to be a competent world power. However, although the time period after the War of 1812 was dubbed the “Era of Good Feelings,” growing tension due to a sudden rise of southern nationalism under John C. Calhoun, too much involvement from the government, and disagreements over slavery created such disunion that the nation descended into utter chaos. The so-called “Era of Good Feelings” was, in fact, a misnomer – not only was it not a time of good feelings, but it was actually a period of great disunion.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The popular outlook of the American Civil War is that the Confederacy was defeated by the Union Army with the combined leadership of Lincoln, Grant, and Sherman. They lost because of the Union’s overwhelming manpower and economic advantages. However, there is more to it than just that. In the book Confederate Reckoning, author Stephanie McCurry states that the Confederate States of America did themselves in due to structural issues within their society. The book presents a “political history of the unfranchised” referring to Southern slaves and wartime women. Ironically, the most underrepresented groups would be one of the downfalls of the Confederacy. Slaves and women became unexpected consequences for the Confederacy as the government was forced to…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Limitations on wartime liberties: What aggressive and occasionally unconstitutional actions did Lincoln take in an effort to win the war?…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One look at a map should tell you how important Tennessee was during the Civil War. The state lay like a protective blanket over the Deep South.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Ed Ayers ideas were that the Civil War was not caused by slavery at all. It was caused by misunderstandings, confusions, and miscalculations of the nation as a whole. He states that the fundamentalists gave the argument of the war starting due to the inevitable conflict between slavery and free labor, while the revisionists emphasize the small events and political structures, rather than just slavery triggering the start of the Civil War. The reasoning that Dr. Ayers argues about the question “what caused the civil war” is that the questions that should be asked to answer this question are a combination of the views of the fundamentalists and the revisionists. His ideas show slavery being an obstacle to the…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though the Union and Confederate soldiers both fought for the victory of their nations, each side had its own reasoning and purpose for doing so. Soldiers relied on their families from home and in battle for encouragement. They wanted to fight not only for their nation, but for their family at home. They didn't want to let them down, alongside of their nation. Their family in regiments was just as beloved. They all felt the same pain and pride, therefore becoming closer to one another. They'd watch each other win and watch each other die. Backing out of it was the last thing they wanted to do and be considered a coward. Soldiers had rather die of honor than live a coward. They were all in it together and that bond with each other kept them from giving up. The leaves that were given gave those enlisted a break from the soldier life for a short period, which was a great privilege. The problem was that the leaves were abused and soldiers wouldn't come back when their time was up, therefore being a deserter. The government wasn't in control enough to do anything about the deserters.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President of the Texas Secession, O.M. Roberts stated, “The crisis upon us involves not only the right of self government, but the maintenance of a great principle in the law of nations...the true theory, if our government as an association of sovereignties, and not a blended mass of people I one social compact.” (Document C) Also brought up in the Texas State Gazette, “This is a Union of equal states, and no state can force another state either to remain in it or withdraw from it” (Document C) Which means every state has the right to leave the country when they want, but no state can push another state out of the…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Reconstruction: Eric Foner

    • 1684 Words
    • 7 Pages

    It can be argued, however, that reconstruction was a success and the South made an attempt to change, but was burdened with the freedmen. The historian W.E.B. Du Bois states that Reconstruction was already complicated because of the war and was further complicated with the addition of freedmen, or the freed blacks. He states that, “the moral effect of an unsuccessful war with all its letting down of social standards and quickening of hatred and discouragement” was already, “a situation which would make it difficult under any circumstances to reconstruct a new government and a new civilization. Add to all this the presence of four million freedmen and the situation is further complicated” (Du Bois). The South who had to fix their broken society saw the freedmen as a burden they had to support. The North was forcing this burden upon them. Du Bois does not blame the South for open hatred against blacks and comprehends their reasons for brutality. In spite of that, Foner’s opinions are still correct because instead of supporting blacks when…

    • 1684 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays