In 1791, the Free Exercise Clause was …show more content…
. . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press" in today's meaning is that the gov't may not jail, fine, or impose civil liability on a person or organization except in exceptional circumstances. The First Amendment does not protect speakers, however, against private individuals or organizations, such as private employers, private colleges, or private landowners as it only restrains the gov't. The Supreme Court has interpreted “speech” and “press” broadly as covering not only talking, writing, and printing. It also covers also broadcasting, using the Internet, and other forms of expression and also applies to displaying flags, burning flags, wearing armbands, burning crosses. The Supreme Court has held restrictions on content but if a law prohibits the people from criticizing a war, opposing abortion, or advocating high taxes it might be problematic as it distorts public debate and contradict a basic principle of