Preview

Essay on animal rights

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
805 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay on animal rights
Essay on Animal Rights
August-28-2013
Animal, what is an animal, you can ask yourself this. My definition of an animal is someone who acts out without the intent to be rude or inappropriate in certain situation. So if you could say an animal like dog or cat is an animal what does that make you and me. I’m not saying I’m considering myself or others an animal but I’m saying we shouldn’t mistreat an animal based on its negative flaws they may have receive, but maybe enhance the positive in all of animals. Maybe it will make you look around and see who should be one be called the ANIMAL.
In the defense to the Human race we are the chosen to be the inferior race, like smarter and show moral and compassion for a human being. So based on what I’ve had said I believe what Tibor R Machan says in some instant like they shouldn’t have the right to own property and have the right to make their own choice in what we call society of norms. I strongly believe, based on repercussions of how animals would view and acted in human life and also they couldn’t handle or function in such manner to live in human society. If this was so we would have to take an animals life everyday due to the point, they couldn’t handle it in are everyday society. If some Tibor Machan would be correct on why animals shouldn’t or wouldn’t have a valued life and the rights would be dimensioned.
To be a person who is to be high in favorable pole or a role model is someone who can follow a direction and never break one rule or never make a mistake if so we lose the rights to are freedom. So that basically says majority could fit up to the expectation they want us to be, wrong. Animal’s rights are consider or based on the level of how one animal is thought. If an animal is evil and disobeys it goes to a shelter to never to be seen again. Do you see the comparison, we as humans are based on the same level of an animal and this is hint we are not perfect. So if I as a human mess up I should get

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the article “A Change of Heart about Animals” by Jeremy Rifkin, behavioral scientist Stephen M. Sivy poses an important question all individuals should contemplate. “If you believe in evolution by natural selection, how can you believe that feelings suddenly appeared, out of the blue, with human beings?” The human race is not significantly different to the point where we must distinguish ourselves from alternative species. Many people seem to be under the impression that animals exist solely to serve our intentions, regardless of the detrimental effects they undergo. We as humans tend to classify ourselves to be at the top of the species hierarchy due to our moral compass and superior intellect.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The general public as well as animals are put at a severe disadvantage as a result of the rules created by the politically elite. Those who are vulnerable in society: animals deemed useful and people who are economically disadvantaged, experience the most severe injustice, in part due to inadequate representation. There is no perceptible correlation between legislature, and mercy. The social justice movement is as strong as ever, and the discrepancy between laws passed and the need for basic human and animal rights has become more ubiquitous in modern culture. Bryan Stevenson’s Just Mercy, Una Chadhuri and Holly Hughes’s Animal Acts, and multiple articles that identify key issues pertaining to animal and human rights. As illustrated through…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals deserve rights because just like humans, they feel excruciating pain, suffer and have feelings. One would argue that animals don’t experience emotions? But the answer is of course they do. It is emotions that allow animals to display various behavior patterns. According to the theory of utilitarianism, all sentient beings should be given consideration in the society and this includes both animals and humans. Also, animals cannot speak for themselves and for this reason they should be treated equally, protected and given the same respect as human beings. Peter singer’s approach also supports the argument on equal consideration in that animals deserve the same respect as human beings but just in a different view. In today’s society humans exploit animals for milk, meat, fur, scientific experimentation etc. and animals are constantly injured or killed. Their pain and sufferings should be taken into consideration, as this unjust treatment is morally unacceptable. Similarly speciesism is an…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals are species of this earth too and they shouldn't be treated like they are any less than humans. People don't realize what animals go through because animals are tortured and treated harshly behind doors, which is the reason humans don't understand their pain. If people were exposed to how animals get treated and how they get slaughtered they would know that it's wrong because they have rights just like humans do. Pollan emphasizes that equality between animals and humans is important when he writes, "To exclude the chimp from moral consideration simply because he's not human is no different from excluding the slave simply because he's not white" (Pollan 207). Animals are usually not talked about when it comes to equality because they aren't the same as humans, which is wrong because just cause animals are different than humans doesn't necessarily mean their existence or interest is not relevant.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For many years, the debate of whether animals have moral rights or not has been thrown around court rooms, social media, and protests. Arguments are made defending animals and suggesting that they should be protected and recognized in human society. Medical researchers are scrutinized and harassed by these supporters for their part in animal testing and medical investigation. Scientific breakthroughs have been made, which has transformed the development of modern medicine. Lifespans have elongated and lives are being saved in every corner of the world, yet somehow, this is still debated as if it is the wrong thing to do. Research animals are pertinent tools of the medical world and humans are entitled to use them as such. As human beings with…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animals from creation have been an essential integral part of human beings. They have frequently been, either directly or indirectly, used by humans to achieve their needs. Hence they are important part and great asset to humans. These animals do have lives different from that of humans and equally have some similar characteristics with humans like emotional feelings. This very fact puts humans in a difficult position of determining the amount of respect and regard that should be accorded to the animals. Some people agitate that animals should be granted same equal rights as human beings. Inasmuch as I quite agree that animals should be granted some rights in order to be free from cruel treatments by humans, the issue of granting them equal full rights as enjoyed by humans should not come up. An objective review of such factors as tradition, cultural believes, religious, socio-economic, and medical as well as salient natural features that distinguish animals from humans like morality, and ability to…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although humans and animals have similar anatomies the two are completely different. Animals are not capable to think like humans and do the same things as humans like talking for example. Animals can’t communicate how would they be able to know what they can and can’t do in the society? Humans are given rights because they are somewhat responsible, but animals have no sense of responsibility because they have no duties in their…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The boundary between humans and animals should not even exist. With all the modern technology, scientists have discovered that they hold human characteristics, therefore should be granted rights that would render society’s views of them to change, or at least cause them to have some consideration towards animals. Besides, they supply us with food that provide us with nutrients as well medicine to keep us alive. Even if they are not humans, they are still living beings. We are all beings living in one planet. It’s time we act like…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Change of Heart

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although much of modern day technology is focused on materialistic things rather than the issues, such as animal rights, which are more important. “A Change of heart About Animals”, by Jeremy Rifkin, is an article where he argues how animals have feelings and should have their own rights. He describes how animals have the ability to learn. What he doesn’t do is describe animals as a lower class, but as “Our fellow creatures” so he states in his article.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animal Rights Final Paper

    • 5494 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Animal Rights is the affection and kind treatment offered to every animal without discrimination. Animal Rights involves treating animals with respect and investing in their best interests, regardless if the animal is “cute” or useful to humans.vi The importance of Animal Rights is to protect animals from being abused and exploited. Animal Rights also protects endangered species from extinction. According to Tom Regan, “Animal Rights is to treat humans and other…

    • 5494 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    So far we've been staring at the situation from a Human POV, but animals are also living creatures; with needs that have to be taken care of by us, the highest intellectual being. It has been proven that animals have emotions, not expressed as our own, but they can be happy, sad, angry, hungry, hurt. It is unfair and an abuse that humans are so self centered focusing only in themselves, and not in the other third of living creatures. Animals should be loved and cherished, especially dogs and cats, as they can bring immense joy to any family. They can become your next Netflix Pal, or your Running Coach, or even your Cuddle Buddy when you're having a rough…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Rights - Paper 3

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many people feel that animals have no rights and are here solely for our use.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal rights is an actively debated topic with many viewpoints for and against which can be seen throughout history and remain visible to the present day. Many stand points exist based on matters such as human-animal dependency, morality, biology vs. rationality, and sentience; however although heavily debated the outcomes are more or less inconclusive.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determining the rights of non-human animals and deciding how to treat them may not be a choice available to our human society. As an advocate for the rights of animals, Tom Reganʻs three main goals are to abandon the use of animals in any scientific research, discontinue all commercial animal agriculture, and to completely terminate both commercial and sport animal hunting. To support these intentions, Regan argues that every human and non-human animal possesses inherent value, which makes them all more than a physical object or vessel. He then states that possessing inherent value allows every human and non-human to have rights of their own. To further his argument, Regan claims that the any human and non-human retaining rights requires equal treatment and respect from others. To conclude his argument, Regan states that due to these reasons, non-human animals cannot be treated as resources and must be treated by humans as equals. In this paper, I object to Reganʻs third premise, which states that non-human and human animals must be treated as equals and with respect, because our communication barrier with non-human animals restricts us from determining their notion of equal treatment or respect, and that attempting to do so could…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his essay The Case for Animal Rights, Tom Regan has set out a broad outline as an introduction for his book, The Case for Animal Rights, with same title. In the beginning, the author makes a special emphasis on that, the goals of the advocation of animal rights not only make people treat animals ‘more humane’, but also deny the view, which is fundamental wrong, that animals are humans’ resources. As a defender of animal rights as well as a philosopher, Regan attempts, through his professional knowledge, which area he has been exploring over ten years, to justify that animals have the rights as equal as human beings. In his own words, “people must change their beliefs before they change their habits”.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics