Essay On Appellate Court

Many people tend to criticize our legal system for being too onerous. In our legal system, there is a three tiered court system in place of both State and Federal court system. Moreover, there is the intermediate court, also known as trial court, and there are the appellate or “higher” court. The higher courts are responsible for reviewing the verdicts that were previously made in the trial courts. However, when dealing with a trial court, the purpose is to handle civil matters. In this court, both sides represent their case, providing evidence to allow the court to gain a better understanding about what happened. In the trial court only one judge is present in the courtroom in which he is monitoring what evidence is or is not appropriate to be submitted during the trial. However, on the
The final appellate court or, “The federal “final judgment rule,” 28 U.S.C. § 1291, gives jurisdiction of appeals of the final decisions by district courts to the courts of appeals in most cases. There are exceptions to the final judgment rule, however. These include instances in which a trial court commits a plain or fundamental error, questions about whether a trial court has subject- matter jurisdiction, or constitutional questions.” (Legal Federal Institute) The intermediate appellate court and final appellate court are necessary to maintain order within our justice system. Without having both trial courts and appellate courts, the final decisions could be flawed. Having one court of appeals could make it a harder and longer process for the final appellate court. Whereas, having the trial court helps take a huge workload off of the final appellate court. As mentioned earlier, the purpose of the trial court focuses on the issue on the case itself, whereas the final appellate court decides the verdict and smoothes out any mistakes that may have been