Essay On Birthright Citizenship
The question that is presented asks whose idea was it to give infants membership in the polity? Heather Horn tells us that, “ it’s a natural question to ask, now that Donald Trump’s proposal to scarp what he calls ‘birthright citizenship’.” According to Horn, there are two common types of birthright citizenships and both are involved in the US policy. The two types of birthright citizenship include jus soli and jus sanguinis. Jus soli is known as “right of soil” or being born within the boarders of a the US. Whereas jus sanguinis is known as “right of blood” or being born to parents who are US citizens even if the person is born abroad. Horn tells us that many European states have incorporated jus sanguinis within their policies. Whereas, according to horn, geographical birthright citizenship is American as apple pie. In Trump’s argument of birthright citizenship, he claims that the US is one of the only countries that is “stupid enough” to grant citizenship to those who are born within the U.S. borders. According to Kunal Parker, under english law aliens are not able to hold real
…show more content…
This would also have to in turn have the same effect with those who are visiting the country from other nations. If people outside the U.S. come to the States and are not U.S. citizens, then it would intern to American laws not in effect for those who aren’t U.S citizens. As explained in the the “Birthright Citizenship Wasn’t Born in America,” the basis of jus soli is from a feud of whether or not could James VI of Scotland could succeed Queen Elizabeth’s throne. While the basis of jus soli may be dated, the U.S. has had that policy in effect for many years. To suddenly tell a person that has been born in the U.S that they are no longer a citizen will cause a great up roar throughout the
This would also have to in turn have the same effect with those who are visiting the country from other nations. If people outside the U.S. come to the States and are not U.S. citizens, then it would intern to American laws not in effect for those who aren’t U.S citizens. As explained in the the “Birthright Citizenship Wasn’t Born in America,” the basis of jus soli is from a feud of whether or not could James VI of Scotland could succeed Queen Elizabeth’s throne. While the basis of jus soli may be dated, the U.S. has had that policy in effect for many years. To suddenly tell a person that has been born in the U.S that they are no longer a citizen will cause a great up roar throughout the