In the 21st century nearly every aspect of our lives is digital with people voluntarily putting everything they’re doing online through social media. On top of that people carry a device on their person at all times which contains a camera, microphone, and tracks their location. The data that is collected and stored on each individual allows the NSA to categorize and track anything they deem problematic. A simple computer program allows the government to monitor every aspect of millions of Americans lives at once, without even obtaining a warrant. With the knowledge that these capabilities exist, self-policing is likely more prevalent than ever. The government has yet to go full Orwellian by cracking down on thought crime, but the threat is ever present without a guaranteed right of privacy explicitly outlined in the constitution. With the 2016 election being completely different than any before it, can the government really guarantee that this type of power doesn’t fall into more radical
In the 21st century nearly every aspect of our lives is digital with people voluntarily putting everything they’re doing online through social media. On top of that people carry a device on their person at all times which contains a camera, microphone, and tracks their location. The data that is collected and stored on each individual allows the NSA to categorize and track anything they deem problematic. A simple computer program allows the government to monitor every aspect of millions of Americans lives at once, without even obtaining a warrant. With the knowledge that these capabilities exist, self-policing is likely more prevalent than ever. The government has yet to go full Orwellian by cracking down on thought crime, but the threat is ever present without a guaranteed right of privacy explicitly outlined in the constitution. With the 2016 election being completely different than any before it, can the government really guarantee that this type of power doesn’t fall into more radical