Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Essay on Effects of Apartheid

Good Essays
584 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay on Effects of Apartheid
Apartheid Essay
Josh Upadhyay

Imagine waking in jail cell. What did you do? That’s right, you were walking on white streets after 6:30 pm without a pass. You got questioned, beaten, and thrown in here. As you look around, you begin to notice the other inmates. They are black, just like you. This was the reality from 1948 to 1994, during the Apartheid law. Black people were being discriminated against financially, emotionally, and mentally. Apartheid was a way for whites to gain more power and more control over the black population.

The higher you are in your job, the more power your wield. (With CEOs having all the power.) That’s what the whites thought so too, when they passed the Color Ban Act. This prevented blacks from doing skilled/semi-skilled jobs, forcing them to resort to bad, low wage jobs, effectively decreasing the amount of power they have economically (Aylett 4). With all the increased competition, (lots of people applying for the same jobs) people became desperate, making it so that they would have to accept any job they got- Or die penniless. This also ensured that blacks do not have enough money to fund political demonstrations/banners, keeping the whites in power.

Voting is a source of political power, whoever can vote has a small but influential part in electing their country’s leader. That opportunity was soon unavailable for black people as in 1936, Apartheid blocked blacks from voting. (Aylett 11) Instead, they had to elect three white people as their representatives. This prevented black people from saying what they thought, restricting them the freedom of choosing a leader for their country. Even though both whites and blacks live in South Africa, only the whites got to choose. (As the white people didn’t want the black people to have their way, the white representatives did not represent the true thoughts of the black community.) With this full white system, the whites could remain in power without fear of the blacks voting against them.

The power of real estate can also be very influential. The more land you have, the more resources you have. When Apartheid was in effect, the government restricted 92.7% of the land for the white people, and gave the land no one wanted to buy to the African population, 7.3% of the total land(Aylett 4). (Keep in mind, during this time; the population of South Africa was six million. Out of that, four million was black. To make matters worse, the whites made the blacks grow their own food on their land. People had roughly a garden’s worth of land to themselves, and they also had to save a portion of it for growing some meager food. Since the whites and already grabbed the best land, the food didn’t grow very well. Add the fact that it was thousands of blacks living together, and you get a very harsh place. (Trash everywhere, bad hygiene, lots of diseases, thugs, etc.) This way, blacks would be more focused on staying alive rather than getting equal rights.

Apartheid was a way for the rich to get richer, and the poor to get poorer. It was the key that enabled the whites to grab more resources, while the blacks had to fight for their very survival. The scheme was for the whites to be the ‘majority’, and have more power. They changed the voting systems, allocated land to certain people and decided jobs on skin color, not skill.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After reading the article “The Right to Vote is Never Safe” by Jon Grinspan, published on November 4th, 2017 there are several things that can be said. To begin with, this article is based on everything that took place not so long ago, that people have failed to realize how important it is today. Grinspan practically spoke on all that happened and that took place in order for black men and poor white men to finally vote. Grinspan also mentions the old Protestant elites and how they sought to hold voting from immigrants while rising urban machines sought to harness their votes. At first poor whites thought they had it bad because of obstacles that had to go through in order to get their vote in, but it was the colored men that had it worst.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to vote, African Americans were required to pay an annual poll tax two years before the election actually took place; this was greatly difficult for blacks because they made the least out of all the people. That was not the only barrier that blacks faced regarding voting, they were also required to take a literacy test, which tended to be very hard…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robert wanted those votes rights were not trespassed, as many whites made efforts to block African-American from being able to vote. Through…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Du Bois Vs Du Dubois

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Du Bois believes that African Americans can progress by trying to vote. In doing so, he feels that the American Negro’s soul will be appeased by the Fifteenth Amendment. Black men planned to enter the “American Kingdom” by voting themselves in. “Had not made war and emancipated millions? Had not votes enfranchised the freedmen? Was anything impossible to a power that had done that?” ( Du Bois lines 108-110) . What Du Bois means by this quote is that black weren’t allowed to vote before so by giving them this power, it is a step forward in the world of Negroes.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    People in society don't always openly accept major changes in their societies. When faced with the possiblity of change peopel become naturally conservative and coflict arises so that the changes may occur. Inequality has been a global issue between races. The English who invaded South Africa started discrimination and racism. Nelson Mandala started a group called the Afrikaner National Party (ANP) and gained many members, sparking fights with the more conservative residents of the National Party who didn't want change. The National Party made apartheid so it would keep white domination while making racial separation in the economic and social system. When the system was established, it first separated all the races into categories based on their skin. This meant citizens of their homeland and would lose their citizenship to South Africa. When Nelson Mandala had formed the ANP he started many protests against the National Party and people began to rebel more, creating even more rivalry. Mandala got arrested in 1963 and put in jail for 27 years. Once Nelson Mandela was released from prison and won the election to be president of Africa, he…

    • 873 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jews in Germany and Non-whites in Apartheid South Africa were a lot alike. They were segregated from the other people, the ones they considered normal. For Jews they were people with any other religion, and for Non-whites, mostly blacks, in Apartheid whites were considered better. There weren't any mass murders in South Africa, but nonetheless it was still awful. There are a lot of similarities and differences between these places, but the biggest similarity is that what happened was a very inhumane thing to do.…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Caltex South Africa

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Whites ruled South Africa’s apartheid government, blacks could not vote, and had no political rights. They also had little freedom, were forced to live in segregated areas and were paid a low salary compared to whites. They were not allowed to own their…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apartheid was made in 1948 by the South African government in order to discriminate the natives. The word "apart " in apartheid even meant what happened to the two races. It was a plan to keep the Blacks and Whites there, separate and unequal. For example, the Blacks couldn't walk in the same stairway as the Whites or go to the same restaurant, public lavatories, water fountains, etc. This benefited the Whites more than the Blacks, this system is kind of related to slavery.…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Imagine living in an actual time and place similar to George Orwell's "1984." There was a chillingly similar place for "non-whites" in South Africa from the 1940's to the 1990's. I believe that enforcing Apartheid is unjust and immoral. Reading this paper you will learn: What is apartheid? Who were involved? And how did apartheid end in South Africa?…

    • 1651 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Davis, R. Hunt, ed. Apartheid Unravels. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press, 1991. Questia.…

    • 4677 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    South Africa’s apartheid was profoundly similar to America’s segregation of African Americans; yet, the two systems also differed from one another. South Africa’s segregation began in 1948 and continued throughout the 1900’s, unlike most industrialized nations who eradicated segregation by 1980. As a result of the extended oppression, “South…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Apartheid is defined as the system of racial segregation amongst people in which in South Africa, was a formal law passed by the National Party governments in 1948.…

    • 1863 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before 1994 South Africa was a country based on Apartheid rules and regulations. The Parliament was the highest legislative body and it interpreted laws as it pleased, mostly in favour of ‘white Christians’. Any other race or religion was treated in an unfair and sometimes inhumane way. These laws were mainly based on Roman-Dutch law and influenced by English law.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apartheid - Short Essay

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Apartheid was bad for non-whites because they had passbooks, most families had a lot of separation, and non-white people’s salaries were lowered a lot, which led to people’s resources being limited. There was so much suffering and most whites didn’t even care, they wanted them to be treated even worse. These people knew how it felt like and soon you will too. Black South Africans were held in a form of imprisonment and could do little to fight back, causing Apartheid to be one of the darkest periods in black history. While reading this you learn about apartheid and how it affected non-whites.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    South Africa

    • 2482 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Firstly, apartheid is an “Afrikaans word literally meaning apartness,” refers to the policy of racial segregation and its concomitant economic and political discrimination that was adopted by the South African government for a half century. Coined in the late 1930s by the South African Bureau for Racial Affairs (SABRA), apartheid reflected the social, yet non-legal, practices of South Africans. In the 1940s, the Afrikaner National Party used it as their political slogan. When they won the election in 1948, apartheid was written into law” (Apartheid, 2001). It was a bitter century for the South Africans especially the…

    • 2482 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays