Preview

Essay On Hamlet's Attitude Towards Claudius

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1359 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On Hamlet's Attitude Towards Claudius
He states how Claudius killed his father, started an incestuous relationship with his mother, stole the throne, and even attempted to kill him. Hamlet says that he would be doing the world a disservice if he allowed Claudius to continue living without paying for his actions. These lines indicate a change in Hamlet’s attitude towards Claudius and toward his own quest for vengeance. Beforehand, Hamlet questioned whether or not to kill Claudius or whether he should try to get revenge. Now, Hamlet is taking action in order to get payback for what was wrongly done to him. All of these lines (lines 12-47 and lines 64-71) allowed Shakespeare to show the extent of Hamlet’s dramatic change in attitude. It is in these lines, that we can finally see Hamlet …show more content…
People had been spreading rumors about what happened to him, but no one had any information on why it happened, who did it, etc. Claudius believed that Laertes, who was in need of a reason, would accuse him of the crime. It is in the speech in Lines 88-95 of Act IV, Scene 5 that Claudius realizes how his actions have negatively affected people. For example, he sees how terribly he acted concerning the burial of Polonius. In Act IV, Scene 5, Lines 102-120, it is explained how Laertes and Hamlet are similar and different. The similarities are that both Laertes and Hamlet are upset and want revenge for their father's deaths. Both are upset with Claudius due to him having some involvement with the deaths of Polonius and King Hamlet. Hamlet and Laertes differ due to Laertes being very courageous and headstrong, while Hamlet is cautious and indecisive. For this reason, Laertes is a foil of Hamlet. When Laertes found out about his father’s murder, he burst through the castle doors with an army, obtained a group of followers, and many other things in order to get revenge. When Hamlet found out about his father, he wanted to question everything and did not know if he wanted to get revenge or not. This idea can be further explained

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare crafts the play so Laertes can have an illogical need and desire for revenge. Laertes is determined to make Hamlet pay: “I am satisfied in nature, / Whose motive in this case should stir me most / To my revenge". Laertes’s need for revenge indicates his desire for closure and his wish to find inner peace. Laertes believes that the solace he desires will come through revenge: "But in my terms of honor / I stand aloof, and will no reconcilement / Till by some elder masters of known honor / I have a voice and precedent of peace.” Again, this demonstrates the need for closure and shows the reasoning behind Laertes’s thirst for justice, reinforcing Shakespeare’s theme of…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Claudius is ambitious man that craves power and unlike other characters of the play he gets and maintains his power in a very immoral way. Claudius, because of his obsession to get the power of his brother, poisons him and this ignites the start of the revenge going to take place by Hamlet, “the serpent that did sting thy father’s life…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hamlet vs. Laertes

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The differences between Laertes and Hamlet affect a main theme of the play revenge. Both men have fathers killed, and both are seeking revenge. Hamlet, though he knows who murdered his father, hesitates to take direct action against the villain. In stark contrast is Laertes, who doesn’t know who killed his father but will kill anyone on a whim. Laertes’ rashness throughout provides the play with an unlikely stereotypical hero-- brave, unwavering, ready to kill-- and is rather ironic because Laertes is not the play’s “hero” role. The hero instead is Hamlet, and Hamlet is not a typical hero, in that he shies away from violence, and is portrayed as insane for half of the play (though that is by his own doing). Hamlet is not even able to kill his uncle until Act 5, by which time he can be argued to be mentally and emotionally instable, if not insane. In order to avenge his father’s death, Hamlet must lose himself in insanity; he must become, essentially, an entirely different character.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Claudius will often display act from a sense of the “ID” or “inner-child”, he also demonstrates, albeit relatively minimal compared to the previous example, a concern for consequence. In the beginning of the scene, he explains to Laertes his reasoning for not prosecuting Hamlet for the death of Polonius, Laertes’ father. Depicted in the lines; “Oh, for two special reasons, Which may to you perhaps seem much unsinewed, But yet to me they are strong. The queen his mother Lives almost by his looks, and for myself— My virtue or my plague, be it either which— She’s so conjunctive to my life and soul, That, as the star moves not but in his sphere, I could not but by her. The other motive Why to a…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the play it becomes quite evident that Laertes is Hamlet's foil. He mirrors Hamlet but behaves in the exact opposite manner. Where Hamlet is more verbal and conscience about his actions, Laertes is physical and very blunt in his decision making. "How came he dead?...Let come what comes, only I'll be revenged/Most thoroughly for my father's death." [Act IV, Sc V, Lines 141-147] reveals that unlike Hamlet, Laertes is very determined to quickly seek out his father's killer and to have his revenge without regards to the consequences. As soon as Laertes learns of his father's death he is furious with anger and immediately demands to know who it was that committed this crime. He doesn't waste time with soliloquies or take into account his conscience but is driven solely on his emotions and the task of avenging his father. "To cut his throat i'th' church" [Act IV, Scene VII, Line 139] proves Laertes' physical characteristic that Hamlet lacks. When Laertes is questioned by Claudius about the extent he will go to in achieving his revenge it's ironic that his remark is exactly what Hamlet could not follow through with. His brutality again shows his determination to accomplish his task by whatever means. It is clear that Laertes' love for Ophelia and responsibility to Polonius drive him to passionate action, while…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theme of hamlet

    • 850 Words
    • 3 Pages

    and Laertes differ, Laertes acts as a stable foil for Hamlet whom makes sound decisions and acts on his words instead of just speaking. Laertes allows us readers to explore how Hamlet should have acted instead of how he did: Inactive, in a state of delay, and full of words. The moment Laertes heard of his father's death he left for Denmark, rallied up some followers, and marched past the King's guards to the Royal Court and demanded an answer. "O thou vile King, give me my father," Laertes bellowed at the King. Claudius relays to Laertes that Hamlet is to blame and once again…

    • 850 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Laertes' and Hamlet's immediate reactions when they learn of their father's unnatural deaths are widely different. When Laertes learns that his father is gone, he is outraged and "o'erbears [Claudius's] officers. The rabble call him lord…/ They cry ‘Choose we! Laertes shall be king!'" (4.5.105, 109). Laertes takes action immediately by bursting into the castle, and demanding "O thou vile king, / give me my father!" (4.5.119-20). Laertes' anger overrules his rational thought, and he acts with emotions alone, whereas Hamlet promises to act, but delivers only angry, grief-stricken soliloquies on how horrible it is that he does not act upon his feelings. Hamlet is amazed at his own inaction, that he, "the son of a dear father murdered, / Prompted to [his] revenge by heaven and hell, / Must like a whore unpack [his] heart with words / And fall a-cursing" (2.2.584-587). He berates himself for this ostensible dodging of responsibility, saying, "Am I a coward? / Who calls me villain? Breaks my pate across? / Plucks off my beard and blows it in my face? / Tweaks my by the nose?… Who does me this?" (2.2.571-574, 575). Hamlet's inability to gain revenge astounds him, and unlike…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In many occasions the audience knows that Hamlet has been having a hard time of figuring out what to do with Claudius, where he should get his revenge and kill him or not, he truly does not know what to do yet. To predict or to figure what he will do Shakespeare makes the last soliloquy in the play critical for the audience because it is the only way of understanding the development of Hamlet as a character. Furthermore Hamlet also points out that he is not doing anything to avenge his father death. “How all…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamlet Foil Analysis

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Once Laertes discovers that his father has been killed, he assumes immediately that the killer must be Claudius. An effect of his speculation is his instinctive desire to retaliate against Polonius's murderer. He says, "To hell, allegiance! Vows, to the blackest devil! Conscience and grace, to the profoundest pit! I dare damnation. To this point I stand, that both worlds I give to negligence, let come what comes. Only I'll be revenged most thoroughly for my father" (4.5. 128-134). This excerpt provides insight into his mind and shows his thirst for revenge at any cost. In contrast to Laertes’s belief of his father's killer, Hamlet assumes that the individual eavesdropping on the conversation he has with Gertrude is Claudius, and he says, "Nay, I know not: is it the King?" (3.4.28). Consequently, Hamlet is consumed with rage and automatically thrusts out with his sword in an attempt to kill Claudius but strikes Polonius instead. Hamlet's and Laertes's spontaneous actions are incited by fury and frustration. Sudden bursts of anger prompt both Laertes and Hamlet to act rashly, and they end up giving little thought to the consequences of their actions. But while both characters have the desire to avenge their father’s murders, only Laertes has any real resolve to take real…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hamlet Rhetorical Analysis

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Throughout the course of the play, Claudius is manipulating the royal court and Hamlet. Immediately following his murder of the late king of Denmark, he cons the royal court into believing that the passing of the late king caused him much grief. However, Claudius exhibits no contrition for murdering the king because of “fruits” he had gained from it: “[his] crown, [his] own ambition, and [his queen]” (III.iii.59). He has no intention of handing over the “fruits” of his crime, that he is well past any chance of redemption. Claudius is unwilling to surrender everything he has gained from his crime because it was those ambitions that drove him to commit the murder in the first place. Claudius maintains his power by acting in favor of the people’s anticipations. Even after he had already wed Gertrude, Claudius confessed his sorrow for the late king and how he was overcoming his sorrowed heart to the royal court to be strong for the kingdom (I.ii.10-12). Claudius hastily shifts from the sadness over the late king and merriment of marriage to his future proposals and allegiance to Denmark (I.ii.17-38). In addition, Claudius also requests permission from Laertes father, Polonius, to authorize Laertes to go to France, as opposed to authorizing Laertes himself (I.ii.59-65). This generates favor from the people…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Laertes’ issues with Hamlet begin as mostly minor, where he attempts to dissuade Ophelia from succumbing to Hamlet’s romantic approaches, telling her, “For Hamlet and the trifling of his favor... [it is] forward, not permanent, sweet, nor lasting, the perfume and suppliance of a minute. No more” (I.iii. 5-10). He does end up creating more problems for Hamlet than he had originally intended, or even possibly realized, by taking away that which he most desired, in the form of Ophelia, which influences many of Hamlet’s actions throughout the play. As the story progresses, though, Laertes’ importance grows when he challenges Claudius’ right to the throne by accusing him of his father’s murder. Claudius is innocent, and able to convince Laertes of this, and postpones any immediate attempts for the throne. This aids the beginning of their alliance, which prompts Laertes’ most devastating action towards Hamlet, the duel. This duel demonstrates just how desperate Laertes and Claudius both are to be rid of Hamlet, as both risk sacrificing their honor and honesty to ensure his death. The duel also serves to demonstrate the lesson that quests for vengeance tend to hurt all involved, as well as the common expression “death is the great equalizer”…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Laertes and Hamlet

    • 816 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Laertes and Hamlet both display impulsive reactions when angered. Once Laertes discovers his father has been murdered, he immediately assumes the slayer is Claudius. As a result of Laertes' speculation, he instinctively moves to avenge Polonius' death. "To hell, allegiance! Vows, to the blackest devil! Conscience and grace, to the profoundest pit! I dare damnation: to this point I stand, that both worlds I give to negligence, let come what comes; only I'll be revenged most thoroughly for my father." (IV, v, 128-134) These lines provide insight into Laertes' mind, displaying his desire for revenge at any cost.…

    • 816 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the play, Hamlet expresses his internalised battle between his mission to avenge his father’s death and his morality through his long soliloquies. For example, in Act 3, Scene 3, Hamlet has a golden opportunity to kill Claudius in his bedchambers but decides against it when he discovers Claudius is praying. He avers that to kill Claudius then, when he is confessing his sins, would be to send him to heaven. He exclaims that ‘this is hire and salary, not revenge’, saying that the action of killing Claudius mid-prayer would warrant a reward instead of being an act of revenge. These conflicting feelings within Hamlet cause him to be indecisive with his actions. As England was in the midst of transitioning from barbaric medieval times to the more refined Renaissance period during the time of Hamlet, Shakespeare uses Hamlet’s confliction to highlight his progressive thinking in comparison to Claudius’ uncouth ways and to signal to his audiences the dawn of a new…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although his unfavorable situation is very similar to Hamlet’s, he is completely controlled by the thoughts of revenge. As he talks to Claudius, who wants to utilize him to get rid of Hamlet, Laertes got too much anger built up in his mind to stay calm. At this point, all Laertes wants to do is only to “eliminate” Hamlet immediately, “To cut his throat i' th' church” (p. 193), like treating a feud. Laertes’ behavior is caused by the unexpectedly death of his father and the sudden mad of his sister. Moreover, Claudius wants a person who is strong enough to compete with Hamlet. He knows Laertes is the one that he is looking for, so he asks him to “put me in your heart for friend” (p.187), rekindles his rage, and tells him that they should share the weal and woe and stay on the same line to confront Hamlet. Laertes is affected by Claudius’ “combustion”, which further turns him a terrible monster to revenge for his father. Unlike Hamlet, Laertes is “passionate and quick to action” (Sparknotes Editors) and has no state of mind. He indiscriminately sees Hamlet as an enemy and Claudius as a friend, without considering the causes and consequences of his father’s death. Although Hamlet is somewhat hesitant, he thinks about what he does and always sticks to his…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who Is Wronged In Hamlet

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Laertes’s father, Polonius, was murdered by Hamlet. Hamlet, blinded by rage against Claudius, thought Polonius was Claudius causing him to mistakenly kill Polonius. After finding out about his father’s death Laertes says, “Let come what comes, only I’ll be revenged most thoroughly for my father” (Act 4. Scene 5). Laertes knew that he had to react, so he came up with a plan to kill Hamlet. He concocts a plan, accompanied by Claudius, to challenge Hamlet to a fencing dual. This evil plan involved Laertes secretly poisoning his sword, so that the slightest cut will cause Hamlet to die. Laertes says, “I will do ’t, and for that purpose I’ll anoint my sword… I’ll touch my point with this contagion, that, if I gall him slightly, it may be death.” (Act 4. Scene 7). The anger that came from inside Laertes was so strong that it blinded him from weighing all the possibilities of the outcomes of the dual. Laertes did not consider that if he was touched with the poisoned sword, then he will be the one to die. Ironically, Laertes is indeed wounded by the poisoned sword and dies. Laertes says,” I am justly killed with mine own treachery” (Act 5. Scene 2). Shakespeare says that Laertes is rightly killed by his own deceptive act to show that Laertes knows that his irrational actions for revenge deservingly killed…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics