References
Education. Inter-governmental Relations. (2002). No child left behind act of 2001 (NCLBA). Public law 107-110-Jan. 8, 2002. Retrieved January 27, 2012, from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/107-110.pdf
Education, Office of the Secretary, Office of Public Affairs. (2004). A guide to education and no child left behind. Washington, D.C. Retrieved January 27, 2012, from http://www2.ed.gov/nclb/overview/intro/guide/guide.pdf
Idaho State Board of Education. Idaho State Department of Education. (2011). Idaho standards for initial certification of professional school personnel. Retrieved January 27, 2012, from http://www.sde.idaho.gov/site/teacher_certification/docs/accredited_docs/Standards%20for%20Initial%20Certification%20%28For%20program%20reviews%20after%20July%201,%202013%29.pdf
Idaho State Department of Education. (2008). Idaho content standards with limits. Retrieved January 27, 2012, from http://www.sde.idaho.gov/site/content_standards/
Idaho State Department of Education. (2011). Common core state standards. Retrieved January 27, 2012, from http://www.sde.idaho.gov/site/common/
Task B – Write a short essay describing standards documents
The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001 is a reform law passed by Congress. I was designed to improve student achievement and change the education culture of America 's schools specifically for disadvantaged students. The table of contents gives a good overview of the various topics covered in the document which range from teacher training and parent involvement to student rights and funding. It is a little confusing in that there are no page numbers for easy access to specific information. It is organized in ten different “TITLES” with sections under each title listing specific information. The section numbers do not start over with each new title but continue increasing in number throughout the whole document. The document contains 670 pages with well over 9500 sections, (Education, 2001). It is a little intimidating; therefore, it is valuable to access other documents that can explain in simpler terms how The No Child Left Behind Act applies to the classroom, (Education, 2004).
Idaho Standards for Initial Certification of Professional School Personnel are standards for what a teacher should know and be able to do in order to teach in the State of Idaho. A table of contents at the beginning of the document lists page numbers for the Idaho Core Teacher Standards along with all other teaching disciplines. Since all teacher candidates are expected to meet the Idaho Core Teacher Standards as well as the standards specific to their discipline area(s), it is convenient that the Core Teacher Standards are listed first, along with page numbers showing exactly where to find specific disciplines. Under each discipline the standards are broken down into two areas: “Knowledge” (what the candidate needs to know) and “Performance” (what the candidate is able to do). This easy to follow format allows the reader to easily understand what is expected.
The purpose of the “Idaho Content Standards” is to provide a consistent, clear understanding of what students are expected to learn, so that teachers and parents can focus on how to teach. The site includes specific standards for each curriculum taught in grades k-12 including: Information and Communication Technology, Health, Humanities, Language Arts, Mathematics, Physical Education, Science, Social Studies, English Language Development (ELD), and Extended Content Standards for Students with a Significant Cognitive Disability. Details for each standard are listed by topic and grade level with detailed listings of expected goals and objectives. To locate a specific set of standards, go to the topic, such as Science, click on the desired grade level, such as 4th Grade. The documents can be saved to a computer or opened in Microsoft Word. The standards are listed in an easy to read format with student goals and objectives broken into individual items. This allows the teacher to easily build lesson plans to meet the objectives.
The purpose of the “Common Core State Standards” is to obtain a National standard of uniformity in the basic education of children in the United States. The standards define what students should understand and be able to do by the end of each grade. The documents for these standards are accessed through a website that gives an overview of the purpose of the standards. The Common Core State Standards are broken into two areas: first, English Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science and Technical Subjects and second, Mathematics.. Following the links to each area of focus gives access to both electronic and pdf versions of the Standards. Each document contains a table of contents listing each standard with page numbers. Each standard lists subject specific objectives so the teacher will know exactly what the student will be tested on.
Task C – Write a short essay describing connections between documents.
Similarities Whether it is on a National level, State level or in the home, lawmakers, education boards and parents all want the children to have equal opportunity and support in gaining a good education. Each of the chosen documents: The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, the Idaho Standards for Initial Certification of Professional School Personnel, the Idaho Content Standards, and the Common Core State Standards are similar in their main purpose which is to improve opportunities and education for every student. They all focus on high standards for education.
To support the goals of a good education, each document defines minimum expectations for schools, teachers, and students by stating goals, objective and standards clearly so they can be applied in any teaching setting. They set high standards that challenge the learning process of both students and teachers. Each document requires some form of testing or evaluation that holds schools, teachers and students accountable for the learning process and results.
Differences
The differences found in each document are seen when addressing who the individual documents were written for. The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 came about in a reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965. It was written, to the States, to improve educational opportunities for all students. It “asks the states to set standards for student’s performance and teacher quality. The law establishes accountability for results and improves the inclusiveness and fairness of American education” for every child, both exceptional and disadvantaged, (Education, 2004),. The Idaho Standards for Initial Certification of Professional School Personnel focuses on the teachers. It updated teaching standards based on the Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC) model (performance based) set by the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE). It is strictly focused on the need for teachers to demonstrate what they know and are able to do in order to teach in the State of Idaho. Even though both the Idaho Content Standards and the Common Core State Standards are focused specifically on what the students are required to know, they differ in that the Idaho content Standards was designed to ensure that all children in the State of Idaho master the skills they need to become successful high school graduates who are able to go on to higher education. Accountability for these standards is done with testing, including the Idaho Reading Initiative (IRI) and the Idaho Standards Achievement Tests (ISAT) The Common Core State Standards is a National initiative to set a standard of learning requirements throughout the United States. Teachers are currently being trained for these standards and testing is being developed. They will be implemented into the teaching curriculum in 2013-2014. Out of the two, the Idaho Content Standards seem to be more detailed and specific, but that assumption may change with additional study and implementation.
Support Education
All of these documents support the education process by holding students, teacher and administration responsible for a basic standard of learning and knowledge. The No Child Left Behind Act requires 100% of students master state standards by 2014 (Education, 2004). This spurred the increase in State and National standards for both teachers and students which, in turn, focuses everyone’s attention on better performance and acquisition of knowledge in both the learning and teaching process.
Enhance Student Learning Because every state in America requires teachers to know and use student achievement standards, it is critical that teachers understand the standards required by both teachers and students. The first step a teacher can take to enhance student learning is to learn the required teaching standards. Keep them as a ready reference when writing lesson plans. This empowers the teacher to create meaningful performance goals in the curriculum. The focus can be on the best methods for teaching instead of what to teach. The teacher can use the required standards for in-class assessment and grading practices. With the criteria on hand, there is no need to wait for the end of term testing to measure and promote desired knowledge and skills. Since assessments are a required part of all of these documents, the teacher can use them to consistently assess and improve learning for both themselves and the student.
The standards can be used to assess student knowledge before, during and after the learning process. This not only gives evidence of achievement but can encourage self-assessment and goal setting for both the student and teacher. Getting parents and student on board by showing them the criteria and desired learning in advance and by providing consistent feedback and motivation is another benefit of using the standards to enhance student learning. Having these documents as a base for learning models gives the teacher confidence and leverage in expectations she can place on students, parents and school administration. They give power to the teacher to enforce learning because the teacher is carrying out the rules not setting them.
In summary, these documents all focus on education standards. Even though they vary and may focus on different entities in the education system, they all work together to support the goal of providing students with the education they need to lead a meaningful and productive life in a fast paced and demanding society.
References: Idaho State Department of Education. (2011). Common core state standards. Retrieved January 27, 2012, from http://www.sde.idaho.gov/site/common/ Task B – Write a short essay describing standards documents
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
New York State Department of Education. (2011). Learning Standards for English Language Arts. Retrieved July 18, 2011, from http://www.p12.nysed.gov/ciai/standards.html…
- 2552 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Those working against common core implementation cite government control due to the funding provided to school districts and lack of proof that the system works as basic reasons for their conclusions. Those in favor of common core cite better prepared graduating students, a more educated workforce, and standardization amongst students. The article indicated that if districts had to define their own educational standards, they would start by seeking out “common core standards.”…
- 632 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Those working against common core implementation cite government control due to the funding provided to school districts and lack of proof that the system works as basic reasons for their conclusions. Those in favor of common core cite better prepared graduating students, a more educated workforce, and standardization amongst students. The article indicated that if districts had to define their own educational standards, they would start by seeking out “common core standards.”…
- 390 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
What IL Learning Standards (Common Core, NGSS, etc.) will be addressed during the lesson? (List number and text)…
- 1583 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The 3 sources I used were New Jersey Professional Standards for Teachers and School Leaders, Core Curriculum Content Standard and the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. New Jersey's Standards are one of 44 states that are involved in the Common Core State Standards. This makes New Jersey standards the same of most other states in the United States. But the Common Core State Standards are only for Mathematics and Language Arts. New Jersey has their own for Visual and Performing Arts, Comprehensive Health and Physical Education, Science, Social Studies, World Languages and Technology.…
- 823 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) is the new standard for driving the creation of curriculum. “Moving from the previous state standards to the CCSS requires fundamental shifts in the way teachers teach, the way students learn and are assessed, and the way leaders lead.” (Fratz, 2013)…
- 179 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Common Core State StandardS for enGLISH LanGUaGe artS & LIteraCy In HIStory/SoCIaL StUdIeS, SCIenCe, and teCHnICaL SUbjeCtS…
- 4397 Words
- 18 Pages
Good Essays -
The Common Core State Standards Initiative (also known simply as Common Core) is an educational initiative that details what primary and secondary students should understand at the end of each grade in English Language Arts and Mathematics. Common Core's background dates to the 1990s with the inception of what was known as the "Standards & Accountability Movement," which sought to reform the educational standards upon which students were measured in relation to college and workplace readiness. In 2009, at the behest of the National Governors Association, the Common Core State Standards Initiative was officially introduced as policy. The Obama Administration, using federal 'Race to the Top' grants as an incentive, urged the states to adopt Common Core by August 2, 2010, upon which forty-one states pledged to do so, with four explicitly opting out. In addition to the original four states that chose not to adopt Common Core, eight others have (since 2010) withdrawn, Throughout the course of this essay, I will examine both the pros and cons of the Common Core State Standards Initiative.…
- 646 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In January 2002 congress, with the encouragement of President Bush, passed a new act that was intended to prevent children from being left behind in education. No Child Left Behind is designed to change the culture of America 's schools by closing the achievement gap, offering more flexibility, giving parents more options, and teaching students based on what works. This was and is a great idea. Children are our future and we need to make sure they get all the opportunities education can give them. The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001(NCLB) is a well intentioned yet fundamentally flawed piece of legislation.…
- 1526 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
The United States educational system is preforming poorly compared to the rest of the world: America is ranked 17th in educational performance, 25th in Math, 17th in Science, and 14th in Reading skills. Disabled, minority, and underprivileged children are lacking the adequate resources to succeed in our school system. No Child Left Behind (NCLB) was a revised version of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (EASA) proposed by former President George Bush in 2001. The intent was to reform the educational system so American’s schools could have the opportunity to thrive domestically and internationally, grant children equality of opportunity, and boost students K-12 level of understanding in core subjects, such as science, technology, and math. This initiative sought to improve our lagging educational system in the U.S to inch closer to higher achieving educational standards, such as the United Kingdom. However, No Child Left Act is hindering children’s chance of a “healthy start, a head start, a fair start, a safe start, and a moral start in life,” by amplifying undesired pressure on students through standardized testing, increasing federal jurisdiction within schools, and minimizing the roles of additional core subjects, such as social studies and foreign languages. This…
- 1474 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
The National Governors Association Center for Best Practices made up a set of educational standards called the Common Core State Standards in Suwanee, GA which dealt with math and english-language arts for grades k-12. They were “developed in collaboration with a variety of stakeholders including content experts, states, teachers, school administrators and parents. The standards establish clear and consistent goals for learning that will prepare America’s children for success in college and work”. They tell what the students need to learn, but aren’t there to show the teachers how to teach. The process took nearly a year, with people leading it from almost all 50 states, and even in different countries.…
- 631 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
6. Peterson, Paul and Martin West. No Child Left behind?: the politics and practice of school accountability. Washington, D.C. : Brookings Institution Press, c2003…
- 1525 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Since being introduced in 2010, forty-four States have now adopted the Common Core State Standards Initiative. This initiative provides standards in English, Language Arts and Math. Every child in a public school will be expected to meet each standard for their grade level in these areas. These standards are designed to guarantee that every child in America will be on par with each other. They use the example in their 3 minute video about a child in Seattle who has an A in his English class but would be receiving a C in a public school in Chicago(Understanding Common Core). These standards are also designed to insure that American youth are graduating high school with the…
- 2104 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The Common Core State Standards are learning goals made to help students be prepared for college, the job field, and their life (“Read the Standards”). The Common Core seeks to lower the achievement gap, which is a gap that happens when one group…
- 1171 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The Common Core has many promising guidelines – almost sounds like the perfect plan. The standard, drafted by experts and teachers, establishes…
- 1156 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays