Many people around the world ask themselves what are the disadvantages of adopting an alternative solution to solve the consumption of global nuclear energy? Based on what we have experienced through events with major disasters and the aftermath of many casualties, it has summed up to result in having failures outgrowing expectations. Therefore, global nuclear power usage is to be opposed due to the fact that it comes with high financial costs, nuclear waste management complications, and the fact that thousands in populations are mass numbers of casualties.
Global nuclear power plants and its industry have been a high expense for government subsidies,tax credit, or any form of public support in favor of the industry. A half century later, we have noticed that nuclear power is, instead, too expensive to finance. The first generation of nuclear power plants proved so costly to build that half of them were abandoned during construction. In addition , huge cost overruns are discovered which were passed on to utility customers …show more content…
Now, this volatile material has a long period of half-lives to continue to be hazardous and its disposal that is still being discussed today is the issue of storage. Many different storage methods have been discussed throughout history and one in particular that states ,”Very few being implemented because of the problematic nature of storing such hazardous material that will remain radioactive for thousands of years”, according to It affects human health most of all if such radioactive material is kept for a long period of time. Therefore, human health has also been a crucial issue due to the major events such as Chernobyl or Fukushima nuclear power