Essay On Quality Of Life Without Cochlear Implant
5. Quality of Life with and without a cochlear implant
Many hearing people believe that the deaf experience unnecessary difficulties in life that can be otherwise avoided with the use of a cochlear implant. The deaf are unable to hear the simple sounds in life that we take for granted or cannot speak for easy communication. It is argued that a deaf child will experience severe isolation and must rely on others for various tasks they must complete, which has potential to deplete their independence and self- worth. For example, Peter needs an interpreter at work to communicate with others and to carry out his daily tasks. Surprisingly, he states that he knows he is unlikely to move up in the position due to his deafness. Peter and Chris’s mother, who is hearing, explains the difficulties and obstacles she encountered while raising a deaf child. She fears that her deaf grandchildren will suffer without an implant and will be bullied by others as they grow up. Deaf children, like Heather, are unable to communicate with her hearing friends, which results in a significant amount of frustration and unhappiness. However, the deaf argue that they have established their own way of life and are very happy …show more content…
On the other hand, a parent who is deaf has a deaf child, they may be more skeptical about the need of the implant. However, both points of view of viable and each party acts on their moral beliefs. It was established that many people in the deaf community found that those who got a cochlear implant were embarrassed to be deaf, and this offended the deaf community. Mary’s parents were embarrassed of Mary for getting the implant for Peter III so that he was able to learn to speak properly. Although this is something that many of us may not understand, it was an avid point made by the deaf community in the
Many hearing people believe that the deaf experience unnecessary difficulties in life that can be otherwise avoided with the use of a cochlear implant. The deaf are unable to hear the simple sounds in life that we take for granted or cannot speak for easy communication. It is argued that a deaf child will experience severe isolation and must rely on others for various tasks they must complete, which has potential to deplete their independence and self- worth. For example, Peter needs an interpreter at work to communicate with others and to carry out his daily tasks. Surprisingly, he states that he knows he is unlikely to move up in the position due to his deafness. Peter and Chris’s mother, who is hearing, explains the difficulties and obstacles she encountered while raising a deaf child. She fears that her deaf grandchildren will suffer without an implant and will be bullied by others as they grow up. Deaf children, like Heather, are unable to communicate with her hearing friends, which results in a significant amount of frustration and unhappiness. However, the deaf argue that they have established their own way of life and are very happy …show more content…
On the other hand, a parent who is deaf has a deaf child, they may be more skeptical about the need of the implant. However, both points of view of viable and each party acts on their moral beliefs. It was established that many people in the deaf community found that those who got a cochlear implant were embarrassed to be deaf, and this offended the deaf community. Mary’s parents were embarrassed of Mary for getting the implant for Peter III so that he was able to learn to speak properly. Although this is something that many of us may not understand, it was an avid point made by the deaf community in the