Preview

Essay On SG-Secure

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
608 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On SG-Secure
Is SG-Secure the Way to Go?
For SG-Secure, there is indeed two sides of the story. SG-Secure can be understood as an avoidance to the fundamental issues of terrorism. Politically engage the would-be terrorists and understand what do they want and what are they unhappy about. SG-Secure can also be understood as an opportunity to turn the threat of terrorism as an act of catalyst to social resilience. Perhaps what we could do moving on is to take a balanced view of resilience. Resilience as an imagined problem for an imaginative group of responsibilized people could lead an over exaggeration of the problem (O’Malley, 2011 p. 13). On the other hand, He acknowledged that resilience can “provide security to critical infrastructures” (O’Malley, 2013 p. 192). He concluded by asserting that “we should be cautious” of resilience rather than be skeptical of its capability (O’Malley, 2013 p. 192).
Lucia Zedner’s work on the paradoxes of security is particularly useful in understanding the delicate balance employing a resilience framework (Zedner
…show more content…
166) noted that “security is posited as a universal good but in fact presumes social exclusion”. Wrongfully identified behaviours can be seen as a threat and fit into the profile mentioned by SG-Secure. As the American clock bomb incident clearly justified the point made (Fantz et al., 2015). Ahmed Mohamed created a digital clock made from a pencil case and was wrongfully arrested for making a bomb. This classic example of racial profiling is not impervious to the resilience framework. The resilience framework exists because it has an identified ‘Us’ and ‘them’. Whatever that is out of the norm may be subjected to the scrutiny of SG-Secure. Resilience then becomes a specific privilege for the mainstream social members with the dominant culture. There is a need to be sensitive and careful about building communal alliances and ensuring these alliances have the right conception of who are the real

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The practical application of the defence power in an age of terrorism is difficult to determine, as it is reliant upon a set of circumstances that can have a plethora of different interpretations from a range of variant perspectives. Unlike some other powers, the defence power is purposive and elastic; it waxes and wanes, and its application “depends upon the facts, and as those facts change so may its actual operation as a power”[1]. Recent developments, such as the Thomas case, have led some theorists to comment that “the elastic of the defence power has become stretched all out of proportion”[2]. In its present interpretation, the defence power is no longer simply fixed on an external aggressor. Instead, the enemy is disguised domestically. It no longer depends upon judicial notice, or requires an expression of proportionality “in a context where the fact of war or piece is important”[3]. However, the reasoning behind this breed of jurisprudence is hard to decipher. The balance between liberty and safety seems to be somewhat askew. In this essay, I will attempt to argue that the defence power is, at least in its present reincarnation, excessively aggressive and at odds with other constitutional guarantors to freedom of speech.…

    • 2092 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The logic of this article was well established, maintained, and organized. Her article was organized by different headings that talked specifically about that heading. Pearlstein unfolds the article by examining the possibilities to prevent another attack from happening. She then begins to emphasize Liberty and Security. Author steps further and talks about “Caught in Balance.”…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Department of Homeland Security are wide-ranging, and their goal is clear: “A safer, more secure America, which is resilient against terrorism and other potential threats.” The three key concepts form the foundation of our national homeland security strategy designed to achieve this vision: The three are as follows 1) Security 2), Resilience 3), Custom and Exchange. These concepts drive broad areas of activity that the Quadrennial Homeland Security Review (QHSR) process defines as homeland security missions. It prevent, to protect, to respond, and recover, as well as to build in security, to ensure resilience, and to facilitate customs and exchange. The responsibility falls on hundreds of thousands of people from across the federal government, state, local, tribal, and territorial…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    608). In this case, multiple surveillance tools, professionals and every day citizens functioned and worked together for the purposes of identifying and locating the bombing suspects. The bombing event is troubled further when we consider that, “the radical nature of this vision becomes more apparent when one realizes how any particular assemblage is itself composed of different discrete assemblages which are themselves multiple” (Haggerty & Ericson, 2000, p. 608). To flush this out further, three key parts of the surveillant assemble, as outlined by Haggerty and Ericson (2000), will be applied to the Boston Marathon bombing: component parts, the body, and rhizomatic surveillance. The bombing was framed around the notion of Islam extremism and terrorism. In summation of this paper, the framing of terrorism will be troubled as it distracts from clearly identifying the act. In place of it, the bombing of the Boston Marathon will be discussed as a control…

    • 5252 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The primary purpose of this essay is to critique the United States homeland security system and its capabilities to meet both the new issues and future challenges. Besides, this exposition will address and analyze the existing efforts of apparent dichotomy that are crucial to homeland security on one hand while maintaining civil liberties on the other side.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Watson, S. (2008) 'Security in the city ', in Carter, S., Jordan, T., and Watson, S. (eds.) Security: Sociology and Social Worlds, Manchester, Manchester University Press/The Open University…

    • 2018 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The image of hundreds people jumping to their deaths out of windows 1,000 feet of the ground, to the masses of people chaotically running through the streets will never be forgotten to the people affected by terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. Ever since that catastrophic day in history, the push for safer national security measures has been crucial in making sure an attack never occurs again; one of these measures being racial…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The core idea behind Nassim Taleb’s, “Antifragile, Things that gain from disorder” is thought provoking. Antifragility is a term coined by Taleb that acts as the opposite as fragile. Taleb divides systems into three categories: the fragile, the robust and the antifragile. He states that fragility involves avoiding disorder in fear of a bad outcome and through the attempt to avoid this outcome it only makes you more vulnerable to it. Being robust involves remaining stagnant with no attempts to change. Unlike fragility or robust, antifragility grows stronger from disruptions making you more creative and better able to adapt to new challenges. Taleb premise is that we should all try to be antifragile.…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “When I was coming up, it was a dangerous world, and you knew exactly who they were. It was us versus them, and it was clear who them was. Today, we are not sure who they are, but we know they’re there” (George W. Bush). The words of the former President Bush clearly highlight the fear of the enemy that it is often referred to as the “other.” The fear that someone threatens safety makes people constantly surveil those around them, especially those who are different from them. It is fear that makes people gullible to believe in the negative stereotypes that revolve around the “others.” Thus, making the oppression of this group to be acceptable for the sake of their security. In “No Justice for Trayvon: White Women in the Jury Box,” Monica…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Racial Profiling Cons

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ever since September 11, 2001, the world’s fight against terrorism has been a continuous battle. The difference between this war, and all the other wars prior, is that we don't know who the enemy is at certain times. A system had to be put into play based upon statistics to narrow down a group of people who would be more likely to carry out an attack, or commit a crime. Since then, Racial Profiling, or police profiling has been used as a tool to reduce crime, and prevent attacks throughout the world. The war on terror was a key factor in creating racial profiling because it uses statistics to target suspected terrorists, allowed us to see what organizations were mainly responsible for attacks, and aided in the United States forming a system…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A: When police use race as a proxy for criminal suspicion, it puts all of us at risk. In October 2002, a group of senior international anti-terrorism law enforcement officials released a memo entitled Assessing Behaviors, asserting that the only effective method of…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By supporting racial profiling we are supporting racism, and by supporting racism, we are supporting hate. As this practice is becoming common procedure, entire groups of people are being discriminated against. This erroneous view of a complete race, induced by racial profiling, demonstrates the overall misconception and ignorance people have regarding people who are different from them. Labeling a particular group of persons as terrorists not only is unfair but it tarnishes the reputation of that entire race. By practically making discrimination an acceptable action, it hinders Arabs and other groups from obtaining jobs and a respected…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Such explosive devices have been used by other groups and suicide bombers in the Middle East.,” which defined his intentions to attempted homicide, “The lack of metal parts made the bomb virtually undetectable to airport security screening used at the time.”(Lerner) With that idea in mind, Americans relied on what they knew so far. The terrorist attacks across the century, showed consistency in their tactics. Thus building the foundation of racial profiling, and the source of American fear. Controversially as a result, the nation was split into multiple perspectives. One in which, “ law enforcement relies on a broad, superficial category such as race or religion,” to their surprise, “this shortcut interferes with more effective techniques such as behavioral cues and suspect- or crime-specific descriptions or evidence.” (Ramirez.) Prominently the position of techniques shifted Americans towards a racial approach. Instead of focusing on criminal behavior, they eventually seeked clues through a pattern. On the backend of the issue, “ other minority groups are less willing to trust and confide in law enforcement officers and agencies, to report crimes that come to their attention,” losing the community need for involvement, “ to provide intelligence and…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Racial Profiling Report

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Racial profiling is looked at as a ‘defense-mechanism’; This ‘defense-mechanism’ allows for people to have a ‘sense of alertness’ around those who are of a specific race in order to keep their security at an optimum level (Harcourt, 2006). Racial profiling, just like any other topic, has a multitude of discussive points with the two significant POV’s (for and against) always being questioned and in a constant struggle with one another. There are multiple examples of both sides; This example being very relevant and a strong one, “Paul Sperry of the Hoover Institution who expressed that ‘young muslim males’ were all Jihadis and on the flipside the police commissioner of New York City who stated that racial profiling is pointless since terrorists are too smart to stick to a certain ‘look’” (Harcourt, 2006). Although considered a byproduct of discrimination there are moments where racial profiling may prove to be fruitful but again it taints the group of people being targeted as being of a certain type, even if that may not be the case. Racial profiling can be fruitful in providing a prediction for the aftermath of…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Racial Profiling

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ever since the terrorist attacks of September 11 there have been an increase in the willingness to condone law enforcement and security actions based primarily on the color of ones’ skin. Since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, it has been the official policy of the United States government to stop, interrogate, and detain individuals without criminal charges on the basis of their national origin, ethnicity and religion. Thus, the term racial profiling was coined. Society, however, has been ignorant to the true meaning of racial profiling and has sometimes misinterpreted the government’s continuous attempts to keep the society safe. It is important for the society; especially the group affected most, in this case the minorities, to fully understand what exactly this term means. Racial profiling entails picking someone out for special scrutiny, simply because of his or her race. It happens when highway police officers pull over black people who have committed no traffic violations of any sort and intentionally ignore whites presuming that black people are more likely to be involved in criminal acts. It happens when people of Middle Eastern descent are singled out and strip-searched because of their looks. There are at least a million people in the United States who are of Middle Eastern descent; do we then consider them all terrorists? Fundamentally, believing that one can achieve safety by looking at characteristics instead of behaviors is wrong. In the essay “Close Encounters with U.S Immigration.” by khan and the essay “Everything Isn’t Racial Profiling.” by Chavez, they both agree on the fact that racial profiling is wrong.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays