Large corporations began to form monopolies in the 1800s. Competition helps the economy, by allowing the control of products and prices. However, in a monopoly there is only one seller of the product. Monopolies may cause prices to increase greatly, but only the corporation benefits. In order to seize control of large corporations was to form a trust. The federal government passes a series of antitrust laws in order to have a successful economy.
In order to stop the establishment of monopolies, the Sherman Antitrust law was passed in 1890 by Congress. The Supreme Court made the decision that contracts would be illegal if they formed an “unreasonable restraint of trade.” The Sherman Antitrust law “ provides that no person shall monopolize, attempt to monopolize or conspire with another to monopolize interstate or foreign trade or commerce, …show more content…
Its job was to strengthen the antitrust laws that were put into place by the Sherman Act. It provided more detailed provisions to prohibit anticompetitive price discrimination, kept corporations from making exclusive dealing practices and expanded the ability for individuals to sue for damages” (Clayton Act 1 ). This is an extension of the Sherman Act and works in tandem with broad based Sherman which seeks to lower antitrust and monopolistic competition and in reality, does not possess much power than that gained and provided by Sherman since this serves mainly as rider to the original and authentic Sherman Act. Perhaps one of the beneficial and redeeming aspects of Clayton Act has been that injured parties could sue not only for damages under Clayton laws but also on the original Sherman Act, if provisions of this law were also compromised by defaulting parties. The Clayton Act was later