Preview

Essay On The Boston Massacre

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
756 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On The Boston Massacre
Was the Boston Massacre really a MASSACRE? There are many historical events that are unclear and the Boston Massacre is no exception. When most hear the word massacre, they think the killing of tons of people, not just a few. When history labels a small skirmish a massacre, there must be a reason. The Boston Massacre was one of the biggest turning points leading up to the Revolutionary War. Boston is the capital of Massachusetts Bay. Boston is a major shipping town.
The year 1768 major things happened. One of the biggest ones was the Townshend acts being passed by the British Parliament. The Townshend acts were a series of acts past to help Britain control the colonist over in the “New World.” The townshend acts were passed because
…show more content…
The reason it was called a MASSACRE was for all the colonist to rise up against the British.
After the Boston Massacre Patrick carr and Samuel Maverick two of the wounded people that died were buried march 17th 1770. The Boston Massacre was the first spark for american independence. The British authorities were removed after Massacre. The Patriots were exaggerating this event they had many campaigns. Many people believe that it was the first battle of the american revolutionary war. The colonist disliked the British after the Massacre and did not want to trade or have anything to do with them. The trial of Thomas Preston. The trials did not take place immediately. Thomas Gage, the commander of British troops in America, urged Thomas Hutchinson to delay the trials until feelings for the murders had cooled down. Two soldiers were convicted of murder. Thomas Hutchinson rushed to King Street where he found an angry crowd and a shaken Captain Preston. Hutchinson confronted Preston: "Do you know, Sir, you have no power to fire on any body of the public collected together except you have a civil magistrate with you give orders?" Hutchinson was a successful merchant and politician, Hutchinson was active at high levels of the Massachusetts government for many years, serving as lieutenant governor and then governor from 1758 to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    43. Boston Massacre- An event that killed five Boston colonist by British troops. It was sparked by a colonial rebellion in result of British taxes and the British opened fire. On March 4, 1770, a group of colonials started throwing rocks and snowballs at some British soldiers; the soldiers panicked and fired their muskets, killing a few colonials. This outraged the colonies and increased anti-British sentiment.…

    • 1975 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think that the reason of using the term “massacre” is to show that a lot of people died and were wounded. It can also be described to the American colonies as a “massacre” because it could be the reason of their revolution against Britain.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The reason why the Kent State Massacre is the only true massacre between these two happenings is because by definition a massacre is the unnecessary killing of a large number of human beings and because the colonist in the Boston Massacre provoked the British troops by verbally…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Boston Massacre was an unfortunate event which could have clearly been prevented if taken the right precautions and made the right decisions at the right time. According to my text book, the massacre was an attempt at protest against the British soldiers taking over the colonists’ jobs. If the soldiers had followed instructions, if Britain had paid the soldiers more, and if Crispus Attucks had taken a more peaceful approach to this problem, things might’ve gone differently.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Boston Massacre, the said “start” of the revolution. What really happened? We know 5 died, 2 injured, and 2 mortally injured. And even before the Massacre, there was a fight between a colonist ropemaker and a solder. What we don’t know, is who shot first? Did the Captain order fire? According to a Theodore Bliss, “I did not hear any Order given by the Captain to fire”. This is a debated theory. Some colonists say they clearly heard the Captain call fire; while others say they didn’t even hear the word fire. But really, what truth lies behind these statements?…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Causes of Revolutuion

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Townshend Acts was to raise revenue in the colonies so that they would pay the salaries of governors and judges.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    They where also throwing rocks to make them mad. So the people charged into the colonists and one fired. That one bullet killed 5 people. They called this the “Boston Massacre”.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the day of the massacre there were many colonist that have died and that were severely wounded. So that event caused…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Zachary Taylor

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Parliament in Great Britain was determined to assert their control over the colonies, so in 1766 they passed a new decree that reaffirmed their right to pass laws regarding the colonies. The next year they passed a number of new taxes, which outraged the colonies and many of the colonists refused to pay. In the Winter of 1770 a group of colonists in Boston took out their anger with the troops by taunting them and throwing snowballs at them. In retaliation, these soldiers opened fire, killing four of the Bostonians. This event became known as the Boston Massacre.…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although many historians believe that the Boston Massacre was an act of murder, it is clear that the incident was an act of self-defense. First reason why it was self-defense, is that the colonist Crispus Attucks was holding a cordwood stick and swung it at James Bailey. James Bailey then shot Crispus Attucks. James Bailey shot Crispus Attucks in act of self-defense. This led on to more shootings, but more colonists were getting angry and more violent. Another reason why it was self-defense, is that the captain of the British soldiers Preston, never did say fire and he never ordered his troops to fire. The colonists were taunting the soldiers by saying, "Fire, fire," which lead to more confusion. Also, Captain…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A long walk to water

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Night of March 5, 1770, a mob of American colonists gathers at the Customs House in Boston and begins taunting the British soldiers guarding the building. The protesters, who called themselves Patriots, were protesting the occupation of their city by British troops, who were sent to Boston in 1768 to enforce unpopular taxation measures passed by a British parliament that lacked American representation. There was a lot of foul language between them, and the townspeople began throwing snowballs at him, because he was pushing at them with his bayonet. The other soldiers began firing a moment later, and when the smoke cleared, five colonists were dead. he massacre resulted in the death of five colonists.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Boston Massacre occurred because of an act called the stamp act was passed in 1765.The…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Adams successfully defended Captain Preston and his soldiers. He believed that the rule of law should be predominant and that the British soldiers involved in the Boston Massacre deserved a fair trial. He defended them through principle rather than sympathy for their cause; argued that “we are to look upon it as more beneficial, that many guilty persons should escape unpunished, than one innocent person should suffer.”…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tensions had been rising between the men from Britain and the colonists, and this “Massacre” was not the first outbreak of these tensions, there had been many small encounters prior. This particular event began with the beating of two soldiers by the colonists, which led to bells being rung to bring in colonist support from surrounding areas. The commanding British officer then sent in 12 men to prevent the people from plundering the king’s chest. Upon arrival, the twelve men made their way through the crowd to defend the door and were pelleted with snowballs and other things and beaten with clubs after they positioned themselves with their backs to the wall. All the while they were being taunted by the colonists who dared them to fire, which in today’s terms would sound something like this, “I dare you, I DOUBLE dare you to…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, The American Revolution (1775-1783) which is also known as the United States War of Independence. Attempts by the British government to hike revenue by taxing the colonies met with heated protest among many colonists, who disliked their lack of image in Parliament and demanded the equal rights as other British citizens. The colonial opposition led to violence in 1770, when British soldiers opened fire on a crowd of colonists, killing five men in what is remembered as the Boston Massacre. While nonviolence set the building blocks upon which progress was to be built, violence is what allowed for the building of growth to happen. Ultimately, both of these approaches were necessary and made off of each other to achieve political, economic and or social…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays