Preview

Essay On The President's Role In Foreign Policy Making

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
831 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On The President's Role In Foreign Policy Making
As the chief diplomat of the United States, the president is the dominant force in foreign policy making. The explicit powers of the president that are granted by the Constitution – “chief executive, head of state, Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy” – are all associated with foreign affairs and policy making in different degree (330). The president has the highest power in this nation compared to any other individual citizen. While Congress does play a rather significant role and does use its powers to assert its role in this area, the president still remains as the stronger force. I believe it is important for Congress to play an important on foreign policy making in order to prevent the abuse of presidential power which may cause serious problems for the nation. The powers of the president should be discussed in the first place. As I mentioned earlier, …show more content…
Even though the president does not have the power to declare war and the commanding power is limited to “Army and Navy”, the powers that he or she usually expand during wartimes. For example, President Lincoln and President Roosevelt have both expanded the power as commander in chief during wars (337). After the 9/11 attack, President George W. Bush declared that because he was the commander in chief, he had the power to make war and take any action that seemed fit to him in order to protect the citizens of the United States (338). The extreme claims of powers by Bush posed a potential threat to the system of balanced powers, however, it also shows how largely the position of commander in chief empowers the president in the area of foreign affairs. On the other hand, the Constitution granted different powers to the Congress that are associated with foreign policy-making to ensure the separation of powers is in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Richard Neustadt’s Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents discusses the powers of the president and the way in which these functions have changed in the most recent centuries. He first notes the importance of persuasion, which, when successful, creates more beneficial and lasting outcomes than if the leader had simply used his or her ability to give commands. Furthermore, the author goes on to state that national chief executive officers should be more “skeptical than trustful, more curious than committed.” () Likewise, he or she should be surrounded with a variety of opinions from trusted advisors in order to promote decisions that result in the best outcome for the most amount of people. Moving on, the writer speaks of the great shift…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under the constitution the President has military, legislative, appointment, and diplomatic power. Our framers of the constitution wanted a strong military but not complete seizure of the government. Diplomatic powers and appointment powers are also under senate’s approval. The President’s legislative power can be over ridden by congress so by far this is not one of the power points of presidency. The President has sole powers of pardons granted. Under circumstances of war and terrorism the president engages in the most power.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 13 Quiz

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages

    c. Even the threat of a presidential veto can be an effective tool for persuading Congress to give more weight to presidents' views.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The President of the United States is a very important and strong leader that does not have the right to officially go to war without the approval of Congress. This law is dubbed the War Powers Act since it states that the President has to notify Congress when sending troops to hostilities and if in a state of emergency, 42 hours after (SAS Institute Inc). Presidents in the past, like President Richard Nixon and George W. Bush, have argued that by enforcing the War Powers Act, Congress is taking away constitutional authorities that have been exercised for many years. On the other hand, people, such as George Mason, claim that giving the power to declare war to one singular person is a very untrustworthy situation (SAS Institute Inc). This argument…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Neustadt

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Neustadt acknowledges that the formal power of the US president is spelled out in the US Constitution but he argues that these formal powers do not adequately describe the real functional power of the president. For Neustadt the key to presidential power is the president’s ability to persuade other important actors to carry out what he wants done. Neustadt views the presidency as at the apex of a pyramid of governing power that provides the president with unique leverage and vantage points to bargain with and persuade others on implementing governing policy and direction. These other actors include cabinet officers and senior government bureaucrats, the congress, military leaders, leaders of state governments, party leaders, business leaders and even foreign leaders.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are two perspectives on presidential power. The two perspectives are presidential power by persuasion and presidential without persuasion or unilateral. The first perspective where presidential power is persuasive means that the president needs help in order to achieve an outcome. The president tries to convince other branches of government or other high-ranking officials to implement an idea of his. This all depends on the president’s ability to bargain with other branches or even his own branch to influence policy. The Unilateral perspective means that the president can act alone when making policy decisions. The unilateral perspective forces the judiciary to react.…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although only Congress has the right to authorise the use of the armed forces, if the president acts there is little Congress can do to restrain him.This is a power given to the President domestically, executing the power on an international scale gives the President a powerful image that asserts his/her dominance. An example would be Franklin Roosevelt. Roosevelt's four terms as president were marked by two of the largest threats to America; the Great Depression and World War II. The role President Roosevelt played during World War II showed complete dominance at an international scale, he can be seen to be one of the most influential Presidents that America has ever had. Franklin D Roosevelt was given the power to be Commander-In-Chief, as all Presidents do and had became an international figure because of…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two perspectives on Presidential power are power as persuasion and unilateral power. Since Presidents’ power is to persuade, they have far less formal power than the necessary to meet the large expectations over them. Presidents take to office their goals and expectations for public policy, but to accomplish these, they must work with the Congress. Congress and the presidency were created to avoid one single institution from having control over policymaking. Presidents’ power involves the bargaining that derives from their position, reputation, prestige and reputation (Howell). They make their personal impact on the choices of what should be said or done, how and when.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Power Dbq Essay

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The president, throughout history, has always been a symbol of the country and has had powers for their title. However, there are only limited things the President can do, while they are in power. For the most part the President has to go through the congress, which might not accept the president’s request. The president should have the power to go beyond the bounds of the Constitution when the country is dealing with war or rebellion, and to take action if the lives of US citizens are in danger or to keep international peace in foreign countries.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over two hundred years ago people were asking how powerful should the president be? Is he too powerful now? Today, in the twenty-first century, political scientist, constituent, and even politicians are asking the same questions. One of the most notable debates over this subject stems from a disagree between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Hamilton preferred a larger executive while Jefferson preferred a smaller one. When George Washington declared neutrality during a war between Britain and France, Jefferson did not believe that Washington had the constitutional power to do this. Hamilton decided to respond; he did so by publishing articles under the pseudonym, Pacificus.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As president of the United States of America, you must be able to balance both domestic policy and foreign policy. Domestic policy consists of the problems and situations that directly affect the country. However, foreign policy consists of the problems that concern both the government’s own country as well as foreign countries to solve problems and potential problems. The United States’ first three presidents (George Washington, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson) were forced to set the pace and create an example of how to balance both policies for future presidents. Because these presidents really didn’t have any previous examples to follow, they had to figure the situation out for themselves, which clearly shows in each president’s successes and failures in balancing foreign policy with domestic policy.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    War powers between the legislative and the executive branch is an important and complex issue in American national politics because there are multiple interpretations of what constitutes the appropriate relationship between the legislative and the executive branch in regard to war powers. Both Louis Fisher in his book, Presidential War Power and John Yoo in his book, The Power of War and Peace: The Constitution and Foreign Affairs After 9/11 focus on what is the appropriate sharing of war powers between the legislative and executive branch? Fisher and Yoo are both scholars in this area of study but have different opinions on what constitutes as sharing of war powers between the legislative and the executive branch. This paper will focus on…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history , presidents have taken different steps in abusing the executive orders and other presidential directives. Many citizens expressed different views over the executive abuse and benefits the presidents have. The increased use of executive legislation in the absence of challenges from Congress has expanded the power, boundaries, and pose a serious threat to the democracy.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: Adler, David. “The Constitution and Presidential War-making.” The Constitution and the Conduct of American Foreign Policy. University Press of Kansas, 1996 183-226.…

    • 2492 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One power the President has is commander in chief. The president is commander in chief of the armed forced and is charged with the defence of the USA. The President has the power to order the use of troops overseas without actually declaring war. For example, in 2002…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays