Essay On Tort Reform

Many trial lawyers argue about the need for the tort reform. The tort reform is a cap that the civil justice system has placed on how much can be awarded in punitive damages. Many Americans see civil lawsuits as a waste of money, they believe that too much money is being given away. A lot of pressure is put on trial lawyers to not accept lawsuits that can be perceived as petty and frivolous. That is just it, though, any situation can be perceived in a completely different way. For example, having a weird and unexpected side effect to medicine can be nothing to one person, but can mean much to another person. It would all depend on the little details. There is always so much more to the story than what is written on the headlines. A small fact
It is all about personal viewpoints. All it takes is one misunderstood detail to blow a case out of proportion. Reporters use facts from cases that can be interpreted in many different ways. These humorous and minute details are used to get publicity and are tarnishing the reputation of civil lawsuits. Lawsuits are very beneficial for the relationship between consumers and companies. It lets the companies know what consumers do and do not want from their company. There is a definite need for the tort reform, but no need to get rid of civil lawsuits all together. Putting caps on rewards should be enough. Getting rid of civil lawsuits would only anger the public. Every citizen has the right to speak his or her mind, even if it may seem petty. Being able to speak their mind is important to most people in society these days. If people received less in punitive damages, but were at least able to continue to file lawsuits, then there should not be that big of an issue. With having the tort reform, a large amount of money could be saved. There are a ton of other strategies to help the justice system save money. Taking out civil lawsuit could save money, but would hurt the economy in many other ways. Limiting lawsuits is not the answer to saving the economy