A living thing has to be able to respond to a stimulus. Viruses do not respond on their own. They have to have a host cell. The cell responds when the body tells it what to do.Viruses don’t need food or water to get energy either. Living things have cells and the number of cells increases. Viruses don’t have cells but they do infect cells. If they don’t have cells then the number of them can’t increase. Viruses do reproduce but only with a host cell. Yet, there are exceptions for some viruses such as Ebola. I can conclude that since viruses do not have all the characteristics of a living thing, they are not alive. So, are viruses alive? There is evidence for both sides. The most logical answer seems to be that viruses are just simply not alive. Some people think that viruses are just one of those things that are in between. Some things can’t be classified as living or nonliving. There are people that support each of these theories. It is an ongoing debate about whether viruses are alive or
A living thing has to be able to respond to a stimulus. Viruses do not respond on their own. They have to have a host cell. The cell responds when the body tells it what to do.Viruses don’t need food or water to get energy either. Living things have cells and the number of cells increases. Viruses don’t have cells but they do infect cells. If they don’t have cells then the number of them can’t increase. Viruses do reproduce but only with a host cell. Yet, there are exceptions for some viruses such as Ebola. I can conclude that since viruses do not have all the characteristics of a living thing, they are not alive. So, are viruses alive? There is evidence for both sides. The most logical answer seems to be that viruses are just simply not alive. Some people think that viruses are just one of those things that are in between. Some things can’t be classified as living or nonliving. There are people that support each of these theories. It is an ongoing debate about whether viruses are alive or