essays
Limitations to Papparazzi
Throughout the world it has become an issue that celebrity stars cannot have full freedom. Many tragedies, car accidents have happened and harm our community just because one decided to stalk another. Many of the audience does not realize this and reality of paparazzi. Sean Burke a papparazzi reform initiative writes personal experience from the issue. He argues that Paparazzi are all about the money, stalking biggest stars, breaking rules, becoming danger to public safety, and a cause of death. Gabe Rottman a representative of American Civil liberties union argues that constitution prtotects everyones's rights. To burke he views this limitation differently. Sean Burkes believes that there should be a limit to paparazi.
Our Constitution says " We're all equal" but some people misinterpret this. To paparazzis equality means to take pictures of any who they want, they dont realize they're invaded somebody else's privacy. As we all know the paparazzis are a business and a job. Photographers need to take pictures to receive a paycheck, to feed their families and they want to keep their jobs. To Paparazis this can be putting themselves at rick, but more to the public. Burke argues that " Rules rarely matter", and that this job "it's all about money". For people to take this job they must break laws.
No one wants their privacy invaded or to be stalked. No one likes to be watched "24/7" but in reality big stars are. Getting to be famous does not mean you have to be observed at every single move you make whether is for good or bad. It is very intimidating that you cannot step a foot out because you know that at the very least there must be someone who is watching over you,and that's not God. According to Burke's experience of being a paparazzi surely makes just anybody agree in enforcing a limit.
When someone breaks a rule it puts everyone in danger. Being paparazzi is not as easy as it sounds, you must always keep your eyes on that
Throughout the world it has become an issue that celebrity stars cannot have full freedom. Many tragedies, car accidents have happened and harm our community just because one decided to stalk another. Many of the audience does not realize this and reality of paparazzi. Sean Burke a papparazzi reform initiative writes personal experience from the issue. He argues that Paparazzi are all about the money, stalking biggest stars, breaking rules, becoming danger to public safety, and a cause of death. Gabe Rottman a representative of American Civil liberties union argues that constitution prtotects everyones's rights. To burke he views this limitation differently. Sean Burkes believes that there should be a limit to paparazi.
Our Constitution says " We're all equal" but some people misinterpret this. To paparazzis equality means to take pictures of any who they want, they dont realize they're invaded somebody else's privacy. As we all know the paparazzis are a business and a job. Photographers need to take pictures to receive a paycheck, to feed their families and they want to keep their jobs. To Paparazis this can be putting themselves at rick, but more to the public. Burke argues that " Rules rarely matter", and that this job "it's all about money". For people to take this job they must break laws.
No one wants their privacy invaded or to be stalked. No one likes to be watched "24/7" but in reality big stars are. Getting to be famous does not mean you have to be observed at every single move you make whether is for good or bad. It is very intimidating that you cannot step a foot out because you know that at the very least there must be someone who is watching over you,and that's not God. According to Burke's experience of being a paparazzi surely makes just anybody agree in enforcing a limit.
When someone breaks a rule it puts everyone in danger. Being paparazzi is not as easy as it sounds, you must always keep your eyes on that