Preview

Estrada V. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
411 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Estrada V. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc
Estrada v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., 154 Cal. App. 4th 1 (2d Dist, 2007)

CASE ISSUE
This lawsuit was originally filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court in 1999 with allegations that single-route FedEx Ground delivery drivers, Anthony Estrada, Jeffrey Morgan, Harvey Roberts among others, were incorrectly categorized as independent contractors with the company. The suit also alleged that the drivers were unfairly required to pay over a million dollars in out of pocket “operating expenses” to perform their job. Operating expenses for the drivers included all fuel, taxes, worker’s compensation insurance and regular maintenance of the delivery trucks as well as the cost of uniforms. Under the operating agreement, FedEx believed the drivers were independent contractors and not employees. The underlying issue of the case is that the FedEx drivers believed they should be properly classified as employees which would allow them to receive reimbursement for their expenses that FedEx would be required to provide.
DECISION OF THE COURT
After initial filing in the court, this case was turned into a class action lawsuit. After several appeals by FedEx Ground Package Delivery System Inc., this case finally ended in 2007 with the Second District Court of Appeal in California affirming the lower court’s decision that current and former drivers were not independent contractors but employee’s. The court also issued a certification order and affirmed the plaintiffs' right to recover their attorneys’ fees. To determine the fee award the court reversed and remanded the case back to a lower court for reconsideration of the amount and method of determining those fees.
After additional cross appeals, the employees were able to reverse two prior orders limiting the range of reimbursable expenses. The final award of the court effected over 27,000 FedEx drivers who were mislabeled as independent contractors.
SIGNIFICANCE
Under this case the significance of the Courts

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Description: Terry Fedrick appeals from a take nothing judgment following a bench trial. In one issue, Fedrick argues that he was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law in light of factual findings made by the trial court. We affirm. * * * Fedrick is a truck driver, and he owns a commercial truck manufactured in 1994. The truck apparently developed a short circuit in the wiring and caught fire while it was parked outside Fedrick's home. Fedrick was able to extinguish the fire, and had the truck towed to Nichols's repair facility. Nichols agreed to attempt to repair the truck. One of his employees began the repair job, but could not complete the repair because a part had not yet arrived. The truck was parked outside Nichols's facility overnight when it caught fire again and was burned beyond…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Enid Garcia Case 99404

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Page

    I review the patient scale and he is under scale G effective on 12/27/2016 so on his case he don't have any discount Pt is resp. for the full payment charge fee amount. For the 99406 and 99407 we only needs to add to the claim the 99406 and remove the 99407 .…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    10. On or before the date in question, Defendant, Anheuser-Busch, negligently and in violation of proper safety standards failed to employ competent and careful employees to load, secure and inspect the cargo, resulting in the freight to disembark from the truck while in transit.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lilly Ledbetter was one of the very few female supervisors at the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. plant in Gadsden, Alabama, and she worked at that plant for nineteen years, from 1979 till her retirement in 1998. Initially, when she started working for the company, her pay was equal to that of the other male supervisors. However, as time passed the pay discrepancy between Ledbetter and her 15 male counterparts was stark: the lowest she received was $3,727 per month, while the lowest paid male received $4,286. Thus, after realizing this Mrs. Ledbetter filed an official complaint before the EEOC in March 1998, stating that Goodyear violated the Title VII as they paid her a discriminatory low salary due to her sex. After she filed an official complaint, her case went to trial, and the jury concluded that the pay disparity was due to intentional discrimination. However, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed the jury verdict, as it claimed Mrs. Ledbetter’s’ case was not filed in time, as the original discriminatory pay decision occurred before the statutory limitations of 180 days.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The EEOC filed suit complaining that FedEx violated Title I of the ADA by failing to provide reasonable accommodations and for discharging him in retaliation for his discrimination complaint. Additionally, the complaint sought compensatory damages (i.e., damages paid to compensate the claimant for actual injury or harms they suffered) and punitive damages (i.e., exemplary damages paid to penalize the defendant) for their alleged failure to act in good faith, and for malice and reckless indifference to his federally-protected rights under the ADA. The district court of Maryland awarded Lockhart the sums of $8,000 in compensatory damages and $100,000 in punitive damages, based on a jury finding against FedEx for failing to reasonably accommodate Lockhart under the ADA.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The State of Confusion enacted a statute requiring all trucks and towing trailers that use its highways to use a B-type truck hitch. This hitch is manufactured by only one manufacturer in Confusion. The result of this statutory requirement is that any trucker who wants to drive through Confusion must stop and have the new hitch installed, or detour around the State of Confusion. The federal government has no regulations concerning these truck hitches. Tanya Trucker, who owns a trucking company headquartered in the State of Denial, is not happy about the additional expense this statute imposes on her business. She intends to file suit against the State of Confusion to overturn the statute.…

    • 1577 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is about whether the statute is constitutionally valid under the Dormant Commercial Clause (DCC). The State argues that all trucks must be equipped with certain types of protective devices to promote safety on the roads. The cost of the safety devices is approximately $1195 per truck. The Plaintiff, BBT, alone owns 89 trucks in its fleet. The regulation like this would impose a significant financial burden on the company like BBT as well as would put a hindrance on the trucking industry…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Grocery Inc

    • 290 Words
    • 1 Page

    The independent trucker bears the risk, because the transportation portion of the F.O.B. contract, holds the transporter responsible once goods are loaded and in route. The goods owned by Jason are ruined due to the trucks mechanical issues. Jason can now file a claim against the trucker to recover his losses…

    • 290 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Connell, Tula. (2007) Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act Now in Congress. Retrieved June 17th. Retrieved…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    An overtime pay class action lawsuit was launched recently in California including allegations against Dr. Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. (the popular soft drink company) and The American Bottling Company. Plaintiffs claim that the company misclassified Quality Supervisors as exempt from overtime pay requirements. Allegations also include supposed violations of mandated meal and rest periods as afforded by California labor law.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Litigation Unit 3

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JUSTIN WILLIAM KING, ) ) Plaintiff. ) ) ) v. ) ) ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) COMPLAINT Comes Now the plaintiff, Justin King, by and through his attorney, states as follows: PARTIES AND JURISDICTION 1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of Cook County, State of Illinois. 2. Defendant is a corporation with its principal place of business in Missouri and carries on business in Illinois. 3. This court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims presented in this complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because plaintiff is a resident of Illinois and the defendant is a citizen of Missouri and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of fees and costs. 4. Personal jurisdiction and venue are proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because the acts of defendant caused harm to plaintiff in Cook County, in United States Court for the Northern District of Illinois. COUNT I: ________ 5. On or about April 8, 2011, plaintiff Justin King, while in the exercise of due care, was operating his motorcycle on Interstate 57, heading in a south direction, in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 6. On the occasion in question, defendant, Frank Cuellar, a resident of Illinois, was operating a truck owned by Anheuser-Busch as its agent, and was traveling in a south direction on Interstate 57, so called, a public highway in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 7. On the occasion in question, plaintiff Justin King was traveling south on Interstate 57 in Paxton, IL on his motorcycle when he noticed a truck with Anheuser-Busch logo traveling behind him headed in the same direction. The plaintiff noticed Mr. Cuellar flashing his headlights requesting to pass the plaintiff and proceeded to switch lanes. Justin King then changed lanes to the right hand lane…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law I Case Study

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nasc Services, Inc v. Jervis 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40502 (U.S. Dist. Ct. D. N.J. 2008)…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Issue. Was Estrada entitled under the law to recover damages for negligent infliction of emotional distress?…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Courtroom Observation Paper

    • 2729 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Jackson v. Gore, Essex and Goex, Inc., 634 N.E. 2d 503 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994)…

    • 2729 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Penny Bachelder claims that her employer, America West Airlines, violated the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 when it terminated her in 1996 for poor attendance (Walsh, 2013). The district court granted partial summary judgment to America West, holding that Bachelder was not entitled to the Act’s protection for her 1996 absences (Walsh, 2013).…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics