Although Frome’s actions seem to contain merit, his vacuity is what causes him to live in constant moral isolation. The author foreshadows Ethan’s fate with an allusion to a grave: “SACRED TO THE MEMORY OF ETHAN FROME AND ENDURANCE HIS WIFE…” (Wharton 70). This depicts Frome’s tragic end to a great extent, because he does not die a physical death, but rather a mental demise. Frome’s poor judgement of allowing Mattie to convince him to commit suicide resulted in him being trapped in moral isolation. Furthermore, it resulted in Mattie becoming paralyzed, while Zeena was left to tend to both individuals for the rest of their lives. Frome was left to endure the consequences of his plight. He was also left with a resentful Mattie, who realized that Frome had truly destroyed her. Frome was a “prisoner for life” (Wharton 117) and would continue to be tormented by the constant reminder of his failure and lack of …show more content…
It was ultimately Frome’s moral obligation, over ambition, and lack of discernment that lead to his downfall. He was to be imprisoned by the bleak winter days of Starkfield and forever trapped by his own mental isolation. It is therefore apparent to acknowledge that the fictional protagonist’s basic superiority was marred by flaws, in which defined him as a tragic hero. It was Frome’s rather zealous nature that indeed destroyed his chance for prosperity and lifelong contentment. Because of Frome’s lack of self preservation, the tragic hero was ultimately destroyed by that of which offered him the greatest chance of