Preview

Ethank You Ma Am Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
684 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethank You Ma Am Analysis
Dragons, witches, princesses and knights. These are the imaginary friends in so many

children´s lives. For young adults, those fairy tale characters give away to darker characters and more realistic situations. However, what do they all have in common? They live in short stories. Two stories that are interesting are ¨Thank you Ma'am¨ by Langston Hughes and ¨The Sniper¨ by Liam O ´Flaherty. Both center around young boys who are having hard times in life. Roger in ¨Thank you Ma'am¨ tries stealing Mrs. Louella Bates purse. The sniper is fighting in the war for others. While there are some obvious similarities, both authors approach these stories, specifically the characters, tone and point of view, in different ways.

The main characters of both stories are similar because they both take risks. The author doesn’t directly explain Rogers life, So the reader must infer it through his actions. For example, roger tries to steal Mrs. Bates purse about ¨11 at night¨, Roger goes for the risk of stealing her purse. A boy who comes from a responsible family doesn´t go around stealing peoples purses. Similarly, the Sniper is smoking a cigarette in the middle of war "Placing a cigarette between his lips, he struck a match, inhaled the smoke hurriedly and put out the light" (Flaherty). The man is making a bad decision. He doesn’t care that he is at war he still does
…show more content…
In "Thank you M'am" the point of view is third person omniscient. In the story it says "There's nobody home at my house." (Hughes). Roger explains how he's lonely at home. Mrs.Luella feels bad for the boy, she changed the subject to not make him feel bad. In "The Sniper" the point of view is third person limited. In the story it says " Then round the corner of a side street came an old women. her head covered by a tattered shawl. she began to talk to the men in the torrent of the a car." With this piece of the story we know the narrtor only knows about the sniper.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analysis

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Houston old head ASAP Grab your ankles Third level Clappers -wale Tom ford-jayz Kendrick Lamar -backseat freestyle. I'll drive to truck Ride-Joseph Bubble butt Somo-ride Houston old head ASAP Grab your ankles Third level Clappers -wale Tom ford-jayz Kendrick Lamar -backseat freestyle. I'll drive to truck Ride-Joseph Bubble butt Somo-rideHouston old head ASAP Grab your ankles…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In comparing these two short stories the similarities were evident and stuck out like a sore thumb. The first similarity that I had encountered was that both stories gave the impression that previous to war the main characters had an enormous sense of patriotism. This is why they went to join the military. They wanted to fight for their country, and if they were willing to die for it Krebs, the main character in "Soldiers Home", had a nationalistic view before the World War I, and he believed that Americans should fight to save the freedoms of the United States. In "How to Tell a True War Story" the main character is portrayed as a person who had a lot of loyalty to America prior the Vietnam War because he has the emotion of a true patriot. Another similarity between these two stories is that the main characters were changed by the sight and horrific events of war. For example, Krebs could not even pray with his mother at the end of the story because he has lost faith in God. These events, such as, watching someone get their head blown off, or catching sight of one of your friends lungs turn into liquid because of mustard gas, changed their perception of war. This would definitely change my view of patriotism for one's country. Also, the narrator in "How to Tell a True War Story" points out that no one wants to listen to the real truth. This is emphasized because no one wants to hear…

    • 1143 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The characters in both stories are similar, but they also have many differences. Normally, soldiers fight against strangers, but in both stories the main characters fight against a close friend or a family member. In both “Cranes” and “The Sniper” the main characters deal with many hardships of war. The characters are tested for strength, loyalty, and kindness. They have to choose between their allegiance to the government or loyalty to family and friends. Both stories show realistic hardships of war that the main characters must surpass. In “The Sniper” the main character fights against another sniper, his brother. In “Cranes” the main character does not fight a family member but he is tasked with escorting his childhood…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most obvious differences between the two stories is how each soldier handles himself after the war. In Tim O'Brien's Soldier's Home, the narrator of the story uses story telling to convey his war experiences with everyone. He uses this method of telling stories, to blur the difference between truth and fiction, and also to hide the atrocities of war. This telling of stories is used to dance around the truth. It is also is a way of him making his transition back into his home's society and way of life that is completely different from what he…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though there are many differences between protagonists in short stories, there are actually many similarities that can be found as well. An example of this is the similarities and differences between the protagonists in the short stories “Stolen Day” and “The Night the Bed Fell.” This essay will tell you these similarities and differences, and possibly change you thinking about what protagonists in short stories actually have in common.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethan Heron Analysis

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The story starts out with a girl in a jail cell. The reason she is in jail is unknown. She is looking out of the window and sees that the sun has stopped and doesn?t move anymore. She calls the jailer excitedly. He listens to her, then walks away uninterested. The girl begins to have random thoughts from her past. She thinks of her village and her cabin in her village. Also, she thinks about the last summer when she put red tin over the logs of the cabin. She thinks about her life in school where she was whipped for refusing to speak English. She also refused to become and part of a culture or speak any language that isn?t her native one (Yupik). It also talks about how the girl is tired of being stuck in the…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the two passages, there were many similarities, but there were also some differences throughout the plot. For example, in “The Sniper” the main character was a soldier at war who must kill his enemy to survive.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The plots of both works differ greatly, as in “A Soldier’s Home” Hemingway describes a young man coming home from the war only to find that he no longer can live…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thank You Ma Am Analysis

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages

    "Blessed are the merciful, for they will be shown mercy." Matthew 5:7. Whether they give it or receive it, people will always need mercy. Love is a prerequisite of mercy. Forgiveness connects people in ways that might benefit all concerned because if people can forgive each other for their mistakes, they offer mercy to each other. Trust results from showing mercy. If people can trust one another, then they can show mercy in different aspects of other people's lives. Mrs. Luella in "Thank you Ma'am" and Sherlock Holmes in "The Blue Carbuncle" both give mercy to someone they did not even know because they overflow with love, forgiveness, and trust.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Main characters faced violent tragedies from both stories. Ironically, Paul and Lennie from both stories met death by the pulling of a trigger from someone who was not an enemy. “His hand shook violently, but his face set and his hand steadied. He pulled the trigger. The crash of the shot rolled up the hills and rolled down again.” (Steinbeck 106) After all that George and Lennie have been through, George had the nerve to put a bullet straight through Lennie’s head. “He had fallen forward and lay on the earth as though sleeping. Turning him over one saw that he could not have suffered long; his face and expression of calm, as though almost glad the end had come.” (Remarque 296) Even though Paul was killed by a comrade, he was glad that it was all over with. He died an honorable death, knowing he served for his country and tried to support for the other.…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The stories are alike more than different because they both involve young men going to war and having to face the atrocities war. In "Soldier's Home", Krebs lies and embellishes so much that after his return home it makes him sick to lie. This theme is backed up by O'Brian's story when he says that in order to make a war story believable to the general population, one must lie and stretch the truth. Krebs often tells his war stories with the other old veterans at the poolroom. O'Brian also likes to tell others about his experiences so they can get a better idea of what war is really like. Hemingway tells the reader in his story that people did not want to hear the stories Krebs had to tell; while O'Brian states that war stories are about people who never listen. One recurring idea in both stories is the fact that soldiers want to do what they like and nothing else. This is portrayed in "Soldier's Home" through Krebs who does nothing but pleasurable things throughout his entire day with no regard to getting a job or making money. In "How to Tell a True War Story", O'Brian states that while lying in a fox hole in a battle zone, a soldier will "ache for a perfect world, the way things could be" (pg.481). When Krebs returns home he is very blunt and truthful about answers he gives with no regard to how…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    analysis 4

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Based on your understanding of the situation, answer the following questions: How do people in “individualist’ cultures behave differently to people in “collectivist” cultures?…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    analysis

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Carrie Chapman Catt, a strong, independent woman, believed she could make a difference by standing up for women’s rights, not only to vote, but to work as well. Catt explained how the United States would benefit from women’s rights not only economically, but socially.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Same

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Thank You Ma’am” by Langston Hughes is a story about a young boy, Roger, who tries to steal a purse from Mrs. Luella Bates Washington Jones, when she turns a corner. Mrs. Jones then takes care of Roger. She does things like making him was his face, feeding him dinner, and basically treating him like her own son. At the end, she gives him the money he needs and they never see each other again.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Analysis

    • 6536 Words
    • 27 Pages

    Welfare nature of government is the evolutionary goal of probably every kind of government these days in this contemporary world. There has been a phenomenal increase in the functions of the government, which has lent enormous powers to the executive and also led to increase in the legislative output. This has led to more litigation, restrictions on the freedom of the individuals and constant frictions between them and the authority. The development of welfarism led to an increase in governmental functions and the executive saw in this a need to perform a number of quasi- legislative and quasi- judicial functions, thus blurring the traditional positions of the various wings of the government under the doctrine of separation of powers, under which the powers of the government were divided between the legislature, executive and the judiciary which were to be entrusted with the power of making law, executing it and interpreting the law respectively. But now these welfare states changed radically and involve itself in the hosting of wide socio-economic activities; for example: providing health services, education , industrial regulation and other allied welfare measures. Now where there is these kind of activities; disputes are certain and obvious. The issues which arose from disputes on such matters raised not only legal matters but also matters which affect the society at large. The constitution and function of our court system is very traditional as well as inefficient. The inherent procedural limitations made it difficult for the courts to dispose these cases promptly thus leading to a huge backlog of cases in all levels of the judiciary. Courts therefore became deluged with litigations arising directly and incidentally from such increased governmental interventions. It was also felt in many…

    • 6536 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays