Preview

Ethical Dilemmas In Medical Research

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
82 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethical Dilemmas In Medical Research
One of todays biggest ethical dilemmas can be found in the Medical field. We all turn our heads away and cringe when we hear the term "human test subjects", as the past has been dark and far from any morality in this domain; yet we do not cease to use the findings of the sadistic experiments. Researchers now use mice and other animals which can show the effects a(n) medication/evolution/disease may have on humans. But I find testing on clueless animals immoral.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Ethical Boundary
    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary Of Ethical Boundary

    In the article “Ethical Boundary-work in the Animal Research Laboratory” Pru Hobson-West writes about the three obstacles in regards to the occasion of talking about the ethics behind animal testing. The three “boundaries” that Hobson-West refers to are the need for animals to be tested with reference to the advancement of medicines, the impacts of “Home Office regulation” and the third is the difference between Human and Non-human animals (1). One of the main arguments that supports the use of animals in scientific experiments stated in this article is that when deciding whether or not it is ethical to use animals, you must determine whether or not humans have a higher moral value than animals (660). Another argument is whether or not restrictions…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Leonard Thompson Biography
    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Leonard Thompson Biography

    Scientists are constantly looking for new medical advances that they hope will save people’s lives and often turn to animals as the optimal resource for testing new ideas and products. These animals range from rats and mice to dogs and monkeys. On top of varying animals, the tests they run fluctuate from simply checking the effectiveness of a medicine already in use to testing an entirely new form of treatment. However, there have beens years of controversy over the morality of using animals as the test subjects.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Discuss Ethical Issues in the Use of Non-Human Animals in Research in Psychology (15 Marks)
    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Discuss Ethical Issues in the Use of Non-Human Animals in Research in Psychology (15 Marks)

    Animal testing gains a lot of attention in the media for being unethical and unfair towards animals that do not have their own voice to be heard. One advantage of animal testing is that it is possible to carry out procedures on other species that simply would not be allowed on humans. Examples include Brady’s executive monkey, Morgan’s hamsters, Pavlov’s dogs etc. This is because humans are seen as having more ethical rights than animals due to the Marxist view that homo-sapiens “contribute towards society” whereas animals do not. Another point is that generations of animals can be studied in a relatively short period of time. This is beneficial when researching a drugs long term effects and want to know if it will affect offspring. Clearly, this kind of study would not be viable on humans since you could be waiting 30 years; whereas rats can reproduce and reach sexual peak very quickly. Thirdly, we can draw comparisons between the causes and function of animal and human behaviour due to the similarity of our brains; underlying structures of the midbrain for example are quite similar across all mammals and other biological…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Clinician Ethical Dilemmas
    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Clinician Ethical Dilemmas

    Clinicians are expected to provide medical services to help others. However, there is a debate about whether clinicians should treat friends and family, members also known as non-patients. “Treatment of non-patients is widespread, with some studies reporting nearly 100 percent of physicians engaging in this practice” (Latessa & Ray, 2005, p.42). A case was presented where a physician assistant (PA Brian) was asked to treat his supervising physician (Dr.Yarnell) for different medical conditions while prescribing multiple controlled substances. Legal standards provide vague ethical guidance regarding this issue and leave a lot of blank spaces open for clinician interpretation. In Dr.Yarnell and PA Brian’s case there were numerous ethical dilemmas that can be examined under the four ethical principles of medicine: beneficence, nonmaleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Research: Ethics and Ethical Dilemma
    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Research: Ethics and Ethical Dilemma

    Your CLC group will interview four different people about the ethical dilemma selected for Part 1 of this assignment.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Research: Ethics and Ethical Dilemma
    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Research: Ethics and Ethical Dilemma

    While medical treatments and pharmaceuticals are common approaches to address a wide variety of conditions, there is growing concern from consumer groups and the medical community regarding current marketing practices which result in overconsumption or no medical benefit. The medical industry however, argues that these technologies are revolutionary in relieving suffering.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Testing: Good Or Evil?
    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animal Testing: Good Or Evil?

    Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, or in vivo testing, often uses non-human animals in experiments to test the safety of products and has been a topic of heated debate for decades. Although some research uses animals only for natural behaviors observation, F. Barbara Orlans claimed in her book, In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, that more than sixty percent of all animals used in animal testing suffer from experiment procedure or even get killed in biomedical research and product-safety testing. On the one hand, successful animal testing can lead to medical cures and treatments for human beings, on the other hand, opponents are doubting the reliability of animal…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Are Animals Right Or Wrong?
    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: Are Animals Right Or Wrong?

    All of my life I have had a tremendous amount of passion for all animals, and in most instances I've found that I have felt more comfortable around them than I do people, finding myself drawn to their many personable qualities, such as innocence, loyalty, lack of judgment, and overall cheerful disposition. As I have grown, my care for animals and their well being has as well, and my eyes have been opened to the horrors taking place all throughout the globe involving poor, innocent animals, who are unable to defend themselves, against the very people they are meant to find companionship with. The controversy over the practice of utilizing animals for the purposes of testing has been an issue for the past 30-40 years, and with it, comes the moral debate. However, the topic of ongoing question, whether animal testing is right or wrong, lies within your own personal morals.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Animal Testing Necessary
    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why Is Animal Testing Necessary

    When it comes to the topic of animal testing, most of us will readily agree that it is a debatable topic. Where this argument usually ends, however, is on the conversation if animal testing is necessary. Whereas some are convinced that using animals for testing has contributed to many lifesaving cures and treatments, others maintain that these animals are very different from humans and, therefore, make poor test subjects. My own view is these animals have produced many treatments, but not outcomes that are effective enough in the human body, therefore should not be using animals.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Two Sides to Animal Testing
    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two Sides to Animal Testing

    Many people argue that animal testing is morally correct because it is necessary in order for science to evolve and to protect human health. Psychologist like Ivan Pavlov and Harry Harlow used animal testing and discovered critical knowledge of development and the human brain. Without these animal experimentations, a lot would still be unanswered about the way the human brain functions. The Institute for Laboratory Animal Research of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences thinks virtually every medical achievement in the 20th century has had to use animal testing in some form. This is because even with all the highly sophisticated technology, nothing can model the exact interactions between molecules, cells, tissues, organs, and organisms, which makes animal testing a necessity in many cases. Suppporters of animal testing say that these advances are critical, and that without animal test subjects the advances would not occur, would require human testing, or would result in untested products being offered to the public without being fully researched.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Biology and Behavior Animal Testing
    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Biology and Behavior Animal Testing

    Biology and Behavior Animal testing is not a problem in today's society because it is beneficial to humans. It seems unethical to put animals through such pain and torture, but if we stopped it completely there would be a large amount of human lives lost. How could this be? The further advancements in medical and technological science is inevitable. Therefore, if the testing must be done to learn more about the brain and body, which species (animals or man) seems expendable for such testing. The real question is which species is more ethical to test on. For example, a rat is given an injection with a drug and watched regularly for the period of a month. At the end of the month the rat is injected with a lethal toxin and dissected for scientific reasons. The purpose of the experiment is to determine whether or not the regular use of the drug would have any type of an effect on the brain of the rat. In contrast there is a man age 23 that has consented to be used for the same experiment. It not only would be unethical but against the law to try an experiment of this nature on a man. The end result would be the death of a perfectly healthy human. Which circumstance now seems unethical? One could also take in to consideration that the human's death could have an impact on his family as well as the people that knew him. Above all the question of whether or not animal testing is ethical or not, really boils down to the purpose of the testing and whether or not it is a legitimate cause. Every man and woman has benefited from animal testing in one form or another. Most of what we know about the brain and body is a direct result of animal testing. Only in recent history have there been advancements in technology in both the fields of medicine, and science that have made it possible to see in side the human body. Unfortunately this still is not enough. The testing must be done on a living organism. Depending on the type and purpose of the test, the organism (man or animal)…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Ethics
    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Animal Testing Ethics

    It is not morally acceptable for scientists to use live animals in research for medicine that can be used to cure humans. Today we continue to use animals in experiments to learn more about health problems that affect both humans and animals and to ensure the safety of new medical treatments. Now that we know the purpose of animal testing, is it really worth killing millions of innocent animals? This practice is morally wrong and inconsiderate of us for letting this happen. People should stop using animals as experiment subjects and utilize the advance technology that we have now. This is happening because we are letting it happen! We have to start by educating others on this issue because the lack of knowledge on animal testing is why people…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Animal Testing Wrong
    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Is Animal Testing Wrong

    Research shows that 26 million animals have been used for testing of all different kinds. 26 million animals have been put through wringer for the sake of a human. 26 million animals have had no say, defense, or chance to save themselves. Animals are used as human experiments to see if a certain product can work or not. Animal testing is wrong on many different levels. If humans are not willing to use, test and experiment on themselves, why should one be allowed to test on an animal who has no say in what happens.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing: A Cruel And Inhumane Practice
    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animal Testing: A Cruel And Inhumane Practice

    Nowadays, animal testing is considered a cruel and inhumane practice. This is an issue because animal testing has contributed too many life-saving cures and treatments. Some people say that nearly every medical discovery in the past century was done because of the use of animals. Other people say that animals used in experiments are exposed to extreme conditions and cruel activities. In my opinion, animals should be used in testing because of their biological similarity to humans, ethics of experimentation with human subjects, and their shorter life cycles.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should Humans Test Subjects In Clinical Trials?
    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Should Humans Test Subjects In Clinical Trials?

    I will agree to disagree on the issue that if it is ethical to test on humans, seeing that the there is a need for it to be done however it has consequences as with all medical research. I agree for the simple fact that it is a waste of money to run tests on animals and would have to retest on humans. In say that I know that I will be called inhumane because the question would be posed to me “so what about the harmful sections of the trials would you allow humans to under all that probing etc.?”. I will defend my answer by say that it would have to depend on what type of trial is being carried out. Of course, any clinical test being carried out and humans are the test subjects; they…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics