Preview

Ethical Issues In Stanley Milgram's Experiments

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
521 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethical Issues In Stanley Milgram's Experiments
The Milgram Study was carried out by Stanley Milgram. Stanley Milgram was working at Yale University as a psychologist. He conducted an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. Milgram selected participants for his experiments by advertising his experiment through the newspaper to participate in his study. He chosen men that ranged from the ages of 25 to 50 and chosen 40 men to participate who were unskilled workers. The objective for his experiment is that Milgram was interested in researching how far people would go in obeying an instruction if it involved harming another person. Milgram was interested in how easily ordinary people could be influenced into committing unethical behaviors towards …show more content…
However, Milgram experiment had become an ethical issue for many people who have taken a look at this experiment. The first ethical issue is that the experiment provided deception; the participant of the experiment actually believed that they were really shocking someone. However, Milgram argue that ““illusion is used when necessary in order to set the stage for the revelation of certain difficult-to-get-at-truths””(). The second ethical issue is the protection of the participants; in the Milgram experiment many participants were put under stressful situation that could’ve potentially caused psychological harm. The participants of the experiment showed signs of tension such as trembling, sweating, stuttering, laughing nervously, biting lips and digging fingernails into their palms. Even some participants had uncontrollable seizures, and many participants pleaded for the experiment to be stop. However, Milgram argue that after the experiment was over he made it very clear that the experiment truly did not hurt anyone and he said that really helped with decreasing their stress level. Milgram also “Participants were assured that their behaviour was common and Milgram also followed the sample up a year later and found that there were no signs of any long term psychological harm”

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Replicating Milgram (The Open University, 2014), Milgram explains how he set up his obedience experiment. His aim was to get a volunteer, a ‘teacher’ to inflict increasing amounts of pain, through electric shocks, to another volunteer a ‘learner’ and to see when the ‘teacher’ would turn to the researcher, the ‘authority figure’ and ask to stop. Unknown to ‘the teacher’, the ‘learner’ and the ‘authority figure’ were aware of the real purpose of the experiment; the ‘teacher’ was told it was to study the effect of punishment on learning, and genuinely thought that they were inflicting pain on the ‘learner’ sat in another room. It was this deception and the emotional stress it generated to the ‘teacher’ that prompted the ethical issues debate…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Milgram’s article, he explains an experiment he designed to test whether the subjects of the experiment would refuse the orders of authority and follow…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past century, the field of Psychology has prospered, giving way to a more in depth knowledge and understanding of people’s social interactions with one another and what drives those connections. 20th century psychologist, Stanley Milgram, executed a series of Obedience to Authority test on random participants. As seen in the YouTube videos online and in class, Milgram’s study found that over 65% of the participants carried out the experiment, despite potentially hurting someone, due to the authority figure urging them to continue.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate Milgram's Study

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A weakness is that Milgram failed to protect his participants from psychological harm. Baumind (1964) attacked Milgram's study claiming that he had placed his participants under great emotional strain, causing psychological damage that could not be justified. Milgram defended himself by stating that he did not know how much stress participants would be under. Milgram also interviewed participants afterwards asking them if they had found the experiment distressing. At this point 84% were glad to have participated and 74% felt they had learned something of personal importance. Suggesting that the research was necessary to show the extreme of human obedience and that the psychological damage to participants was long-lasting.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1963, Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, conducted a series of social psychology experiments to study the conditions under which the people are obedient to authorities and personal conscience. The purpose of his experiment was to determine whether or not people were particularly obedient to the higher authority who instructed them to perform various acts even if they violate their own morals and ethics. It was one of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology as it has inspired other researchers to explore what makes people question authority and more importantly, what leads them to follow orders. There were several replications of his experiment and the results were identical to those reported by Milgram about how…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. This story is about a man, Peyton Farquhar, who broke the Union law and is now getting hung off of Owl Creek Bridge. In part one, the story is going through what Farquhar is thinking while he is awaiting his inevitable death. In part two, Bierce gives you background information on Farquhar and what he did to deserve his death. Part three is about Farquhar finally escaping his demise by freeing his hands and neck and hiking the thirty miles back home. It turns out in the end that Farquhar finding his way back home was just his mind playing out an unreal scenario, and he had actually fallen to his death. The reason why he was being hung is because he intruded on a Union claimed territory and tried to burn it down.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Perils of Obedience, Stanley Milgram expresses his findings of an experiment he conducted trying to prove the lengths people will go to be obedient to authority.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    While the test subject is in complete control over when the experiment can be stopped based on their own level of morals, it would not be considered proper to put the test subject in an environment like this that could be perceived as “hostile” without their complete knowledge of their part in the experiment. It would be impossible to inform the test subjects about the extremely stressful experiment they would be taking place in without informing them on exactly what they would be doing, and in this experiment, the discretion of the test was important to get clear and true results. Another immoral part of Milgram’s experiment was the severe psychological stress imposed on the applicants. Numerous participants stated that they felt extremely uncomfortable about what they were expected to do, although a sizable amount of the members in the primary trials subsequently pronounced that they felt vastly pleased to have been chosen to take part in the experiment. Another immoral aspect of the experiment was the fact that the test subject was not expressly given the right to withdrawal from the experiment, and were continuously given orders to continue the experiment. Milgram claimed that in this experiment strict orders were essential to…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Informed Consent – The concept of this is telling participants how their contribution would advance the research. Before the experiment the participants should be aware of few things such as; what would be expected, the risks, the overall purpose and the entitlement.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram (1963) himself, however, recognises a plethora of caveats – demonstrating a scientific awareness of his experiment’s scientific limitations such the location of the experiment was cited as a possible influence as Yale University is and was considered to be prestigious, thus reinforcing the reliability and plausibility of the experimenter himself. This was demonstrated by a follow up study which replicated the procedure in a rundown location, in which the obedience rate dropped to 47.5% (McLeod,…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram's experiment in 1960 by social psychologist Dr. Stanely Milgram's (1963, 1965) was a controversial experiment. He researched the effect of authority on obedience. I don't think the scientific community overreacted to this experiment because it is unethical to reduce subjects to "twitching shuttering wrecks". Though the human mind is amazing strong we still do not know its breaking point. For interviewers to carry out the kind of experiment they did, they have to be willing to face the consequences of the experiment which could be a permanent damaged mental state. I do believe we need to do experiments like this as the outcome was very eye opening but it has to be better regulated and the background and methods of experimentation clearly…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Problems with this research were that it went against a lot of ethical issues. One of the main ones was the fact that their right to withdraw was taken away from them. When some of the participants asked to stop, the experiment disallowed them. Although Milgrams claimed that participants knew they were free to leave at any time, some of the participants felt that they had no choice but to continue. Also Milgrams deceived the participants. He told the participants that they would be involved in an experiment of the effects of punishment on learning which was not the real purpose. Milgrams argued that if he had told them the real aim of the…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The ethical concerns in the experiment were also argued by Baumrind (1964) ‘…. The feelings and rights of Milgram’s participants have been abused and inadequate measures were taken to protect them from stress and emotional conflict (Gross, 2015). However, in Milgram's defence he argued that participants had agreed to take part and some people could have left if they really wanted to. The participants had also a full…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgram’s experiment was created to show how well people react when obeying the orders of authority. The subjects who ask the questions were the teachers, and the test subjects who had to answer were the learners. If the learner answers the question incorrectly, the teacher will punish them by giving them a shock that was harmful, but not life-threatening. During the experiment, the intensity of the shock increased, which made the learner yell and scream…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He set out to prove that individuals would obey with the request of authority figures. McLeod in his summary states, “Milgram was interested in researching how far people would go in obeying an instruction if it involved harming another person. Stanley Milgram was interested in how easily ordinary people could be influenced into committing atrocities for example, Germans in WWII.” (McLeod, The Milgram Experiment, 2007) The experiment was carried out by asking participants/teachers to deliver a series of electrical shocks to another person when a question was answered incorrectly. Also, if a mistake was made, the teacher could deliver an increased voltage level to the student. The general findings were that individuals who were going to disobey were those who responded not to the learner’s cries of pain but to the learners request to be set free. People are more likely to obey if there is an authority figure there to take the blame. “The power of legitimate, close-at-hand authorities is dramatically apparent in stories of those who complied with orders to carry out the atrocities of the Holocaust, and those who didn’t.” (Social Psychology) Milgram’s experiment further proves that obedience plays a major part in behavior and people are going to do what is necessary to fit…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays