Preview

Ethical Issues in the Insider

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
723 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethical Issues in the Insider
Ethical Issues in The Insider

The Insider is a 1999 movie based on real-life events that happened within an unaired 1994 episode of 60 minutes on CBS. Dr. Jeffrey Wigand, played by Russell Crowe, was the Vice President of Research and Development for the Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation and was not satisfied with the way that the third largest tobacco company was going. Wigand was then fired when he began to voice his personal opinion about how he did not agree with how the company was adding various chemicals to make cigarettes even more addictive then they already are. Lowell Bergman, played by Al Pacino, was the producer for 60 Minutes and comes into play when he sees how Wigand has a story to share with the world. Wigand ultimately decides to tell his story, which has its consequences. Even despite the risks Wigand took by taping this interview, CBS eventually decided to not air the episode due to the fact that Brown and Williamson could file a lawsuit.
There are several ethical dilemmas between the men and the companies, but there are three that are most essential. The first one is how Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation is extremely determined to keep their research about nicotine concealed from the public. They do not want the negative health effects of nicotine to be known, or they would lose their customer loyalty. It stated that the tobacco companies spend over $500 million a year just on a legal team alone and have never lost a lawsuit, despite all the customers who are suffering from illnesses linked to the product. Their money hungry attitude was also displayed when they fired Wigand immediately after he disagreed with the company. They then threatened him and his family and filed a suppression order to make sure no more information was leaked about the company’s products. This issue should have been handled long before Wigand wanted to voice his opinions. They should not have used all their power to hide the information. The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Wigand was involved in a court case where he was given a deposition testimony, for the state of Mississippi vs. tobacco companies. Dr. Wigand argument was that the tobacco companies worked with nicotine content. Tobacco companies made no effort to provide with a safer product, and failed to reveal to the public on how addicting their product was. In 1996, Dr. Wigand was interviewed and was aired on TV; Dr. Wigand let the nation know and he made it clear how he felt against the cigarette companies. With this interview Dr. Wigand had to hire a bodyguard and he received several threats. Dr. Wigand help in the 1998 settlement agreement where tobacco companies agreed to pay billions of dollars for medical costs.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case AnalysisAngela RosadoProfessional & Ethical Issues in Forensic PsychOctober 15, 2014Mary McGreevyCase Analysis “In Vignette 3, an inmate is incarcerated due to a history of violent behavior(s). While in prison the inmate was known as being a “model prisoner”. Now that the inmate is scheduled for a parole hearing, the warden believes the inmate possesses the propensity to commit a violent crime if released, and “requests that a psychologists/psychiatrist evaluate the inmate using psychological tests”. The warden has requested that the evaluator commit a known Ethical and Statutory violations, so that he may keep the inmate in prison and that the inmate’s parole request be denied”…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A guiding principle followed by most administrators and health care providers is the concept that ethical principles must match the values of the whole organization. This belief should serve as a continuous teaching to all staff so that the organization’s goals may be uniformly achieved. Healthcare administrators must be fully competent in adhering to the ethical principles of patient and employee confidentiality in order to promote trust, respect, and the protection of individual’s rights concerning health information. This is one of the main objectives of the Privacy Rule or HIPAA, and a breach to…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In short, the film delves into the life of a former corporate scientist for one of the biggest tobacco companies in the United States. Obviously, as a corporate scientist, the man knows the ins and outs of the tobacco industry, as well as the negative side effects of tobacco (which were unclear to the public at the time). When the man decides to…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Outsiders Analysis

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Things are rough all over.”(Hinton 35).The novel, The outsiders, By S.E. Hinton is about a conflict of Ponyboy and his family having struggles as a Greaser. Being a Gang that is broken on, is a struggle that makes their lives hard and difficult. While Ponyboy always sees things in a positive way to keep going. S.E. Hinton’s theme “ Things are rough all over.” is evident in the struggles Greasers and Socs face. However the Greasers face more struggles then Socs because, they live in poverty, plus they don't have a great education, and even though the Socs get in trouble too, they get all the breaks.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Edna Hacker Analysis

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In conclusion, Hacker’s argument that “no company should be made to pay for the misuse of their product.” was incorrect because Hacker compares two different products that do not have any connection with each other. Automobile and cell phone provide people with many benefits, but tobacco does not. Furthermore, using any kind of the tobacco products only lead to numerous issues to the health, and since tobacco is made from nicotine not only effects the smoker but also people around them as…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cigarette Pacakging

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages

    As Australian society and the community develop throughout the years, many people are opting for healthier food choices, healthier lifestyles, and overall, are just more health conscious. Thus, the issue of smoking cigarettes and the health hazards it engenders has become a popular topic among the public. Recently, in Australia, legislation was passed that requires all cigarettes to be sold in plain green packaging, with no branding. The introduction of this legislation has stirred up much commotion, causing people to voice their opinion through the media. In the opinion article:’ Plain cigarette packaging will change smoking… slowly’, (No Date, The Conversation), Paul Harrison conveys his support for the new legislation, as he believes, from his extended research, that it can help to discourage smoking. On the other hand, Brendan O’Neill displays an opposing viewpoint through his opinion article, ‘Plain packaging is an infringement of free speech’ (26 November 2011, The Australian), suggesting that this new law is yet another one of the government’s ways of suppressing the public’s right to freedom of speech.…

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Soda: Pony, Dally, and, Johnny were in a burning up church. Then a board fell on him and got hurt. Then they rushed him to the ambulance.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sullum, Jacob. Chapter 7. For Your Own Good: The Anti-smoking Crusade and the Tyranny of Public Health. New York: Free, 1998. 130-31. Print.…

    • 1983 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Herlihy, B. & G. Corey (1997). Boundary issues in counseling: Multiple roles and responsibilities. Alexandria, VA: ACA.…

    • 8296 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think it was ethical for Dr. Wigand to violate his confidentiality agreement, even though he put his family’s life and health and his life at risk. By breaching the agreement Wigand lost his severance package and his health plan. It got the truth out about what the company is doing to cigarettes, and how it will affect the people’s health. Wigand agreed to tell the truth during a court hearing so that it was mandatory for him to tell the truth and it wasn’t technically wrong for him to do it. By doing this he told the nation of the health risks of smoking tobacco.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The use of tobacco is a very controversial topic here in the United States. The harmful side effects of tobacco are well known and consequently, many believe that it should be outlawed. Though this has not yet occurred, constant regulations on the industry and the use of the plant has been put in place. This paper will discuss the history of the tobacco industry, its corporate stakeholders and response to their issues, the role of the industry in its social, economic, and political setting, domestic and international ethics, ecological and natural resources, and social issues. The paper will conclude with my ratings of the industry pertaining to its overall social responsiveness and its accomplishments and this area, and of the industry in relation to the Saint Leo University core values.…

    • 3072 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The movie, “Thank You for Smoking” is a comedy with a tobacco industry lobbyist, Nick Naylor as the lead. The movie has an eerie comic theme which tackles the serious issue of the addicting substance of tobacco, or to be more specific, nicotine. The idea which the movie was trying to portray was that this lobbyist was a great speaker who is able to manipulate many a feeble-mind. A lobbyist, to begin with, is one who is employed to persuade all-concerned of the employer’s concern(s), in this case, the marketing of tobacco products.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe anyone who began smoking before the risks of smoking were known and before the addictive properties were known should be able to sue the tobacco companies. People were mislead into believing a product was safe to use which the companies knew was not safe and purposely made more addictive.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    From approximately 1950-1980, law firms defending tobacco companies really had their work cut out for them because around this time smoking tobacco was beginning to be linked to lung cancer and other diseases. The Tobacco Institute reassured people for decades that there was no link between smoking cigarettes and any diseases, however the Industry knew there was a chance for disease and chose to deny the risks and misrepresent tobacco. Research and studies were conducted, however they could not get proof that cigarette smoking was a cause of cancer. A full page statement was released and ran in over 450 American newspapers and was aimed at over 43 million people in 1954. It was called “A Frank Statement to Cigarette Smokers,” and was written by the Tobacco Industry Research Committee to help ease the mind of American smokers, and show that there was no direct link between cigarette smoking and cancer found by researchers (“Tobacco News”, 2012).…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays