Preview

Ethical Theories Of Euthanasia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
909 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethical Theories Of Euthanasia
Critically evaluate medical ethics and legal issues

Medical ethics are ‘the values and guidelines governing decisions in medical practise’ as noted by The Free Dictionary (2012).By discussing the controversial topic of Euthanasia I will compare contrasting ethical principles and theories and the legal issues surrounding this topic. The ethical principles outlined will be; autonomy, non-maleficence, benevolence and utility. Furthermore the ethical theories supporting these principles that will also be outlined are; utilitarianism, deontology (both Ross and Kant’s version), Rawls’s theory of justice, natural law ethics, virtue ethics and care ethics (Schwartz, Preece and Hendry, 2002).
Utilitarianism
An ethical theory which falls into the bracket …show more content…
Euthanasia, which is sometimes called a mercy killing, is currently illegal in the United Kingdom due to concerns that people may take advantage of this for example; killing elderly parents to earn an inheritance, to relieve a person from the responsibility of becoming a carer for a dependant sick relative, there are also concerns that euthanasia being legalized could award doctors too much power (Schwartz, Preece and Hendry, …show more content…
Both Kantian Deontology and Rossian Deontology are against the act of Euthanasia as in Kantian Deontology there are many perfect duties which a person must follow including ‘the duty to keep promises’ (Puthota 2011) and as all doctors must take the Hippocratic Oath and promise ‘…to use treatments for the benefit of the ill in accordance with my ability and my judgment, but from what is to their harm and injustice I will keep them’ (Dr Sokol 2008) they must uphold this promise, within Rossian Deontology prima facies duty dictates that a person must perform the actions relative to the greater good therefore treating a patient in a beneficial way in order to increase their quality of life not to end their life (Puthota
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Religion and Bioethics: Physician Assisted Suicide, a Religious Perspective
    • 2205 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Religion and Bioethics: Physician Assisted Suicide, a Religious Perspective

    In order to fully understand the “euthanasia debate,” it is crucial to look at our two main theoretical camps: deontological or “Kantian” ethics, and teleological or “utilitarian” ethics. Both sides make valid points regarding this bioethical issue. Therefore, in order to form your own opinion/make conclusions on this matter, it is crucial to have substantial knowledge regarding the assertions on both sides of the argument – this is the only way in which to truly make sound arguments/draw valid conclusions.…

    • 2205 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Peter Singer's Voluntary Euthanasi A Utilitarian Perspective
    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Peter Singer's Voluntary Euthanasi A Utilitarian Perspective

    In this paper, the main topic of discussion will be on how Utilitarian theory and Deontology handle the subject of euthanasia and PAS. While both methods have the same effect, PAS (Physician-Assisted Suicide) is performed by the patient injecting a prescribed lethal dose of medication, whereas euthanasia involves the doctor administering the lethal dose. The specific question being addressed in this paper is whether or not these options, PAS and euthanasia, are considered ethical by utilitarian and deontological standards, and I will divide the paper up into two halves, each theory explaining and telling its own perspective. It is my understanding that the utilitarian viewpoint supports the…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    AnalysisofanEthicalDilemma
    • 652 Words
    • 2 Pages

    AnalysisofanEthicalDilemma

    Euthanasia, also known as mercy killing, is defined as putting to death someone that is suffering from a painful or prolonged illness. An individual acts on behalf of the patient to end their life by making the means of death available and serving as the agent of death. Voluntary euthanasia occurs when a patient gives consent while involuntary euthanasia is when they do not. In non-voluntary euthanasia the patient is not able to give consent. (ANA, 2013). In this paper we will discuss ethical theories and principals for our position on Euthanasia, as well as explain how these theories and principals apply to euthanasia. The impact on values, morals, and nursing practice will also be discussed.…

    • 652 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arguments Against Euthanasia Ethical
    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page

    Arguments Against Euthanasia Ethical

    Euthanasia is currently legal in the United States, but still considered cruel to some people. Animals that are in agony and need mercy are euthanized. Some think that it's cruel to put animals out of there misery, but some think it's cruel not to. Euthanasia, mercy killing used on animals, is fair to animals in suffer. If a dog got hit by a car and was in great pain, you could either wait until it dies on its own, or euthanize the dog, putting it out of its misery.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Analysis of Philippa Foot's Article on Euthanasia
    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Analysis of Philippa Foot's Article on Euthanasia

    Cited: Foot, Philippa. "Euthanasia." Ethics: History, Theory, and Contemporary Issues. 2nd ed. Eds. Steven M. Cahn and Peter Markie. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. 790-805…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Daniel Callahan's Article 'When Self-Determination Runs Amok'
    • 2172 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Daniel Callahan's Article 'When Self-Determination Runs Amok'

    The debate around euthanasia is a tricky topic from the perspective of both patients and doctors. Should it be allowed, and if so, when is it appropriate to practice? Should doctors be held to moral standards when practicing euthanasia, and if so, which ones? Is killing a patient any different than letting a patient die? Daniel Callahan has responded to philosophers such as James Rachels in his article, “When Self-Determination Runs Amok,” and insists that recognizing the moral distinction between killing and letting die is crucial in evaluating whether euthanasia is permissible. Callahan discusses how euthanasia should not be permitted under any circumstances based on three important turning…

    • 2172 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Euthanasia Ethically Wrong
    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Is Euthanasia Ethically Wrong

    Euthanasia advocates Patients are constantly receiving criticism from those who believe that euthanasia is not ethical and should be illegal everywhere. Euthanasia can be defined as the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease. The practice of euthanasia is illegal in most countries. Euthanasia can be either voluntary, non-voluntary, or involuntary. Voluntary euthanasia occurs when the patient requests to die. Non-voluntary euthanasia occurs when a patient is either unconscious or unable to make a choice regarding their death and an appropriate person makes this decision for them. Involuntary euthanasia occurs when the patient wishes to live but is killed anyway and is considered murder. There are different…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Morality Of Euthanasia Analysis
    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Morality Of Euthanasia Analysis

    According to James Rachels, in his essay “The Morality of Euthanasia,” the American Medical Association’s Conventional Doctrine in Euthanasia is false. The Conventional Doctrine states that there are certain situations in which letting someone die or passive euthanasia is morally permissible, but killing a patient or active euthanasia is not. For instance, in many circumstances a doctor can withhold treatment and will do nothing wrong if the patient were to die, but if the doctor were to provoke the death of the patient then it would be morally wrong. Rachels’ final goal is not to take a stand on the rightness or wrongness of euthanasia but instead show that if passive euthanasia is morally permissible then active euthanasia is also morally permissible. (define euthanasia)…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Arguments Against Physician Assisted Suicide
    • 2793 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Arguments Against Physician Assisted Suicide

    The primary focus of conflict with regard to physician-assisted suicide is whether or not it is ethically sound. To determine what is ethically sound, however, one must first define the meaning of ethics. This may appear…

    • 2793 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia Ethical Dilemma
    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Euthanasia Ethical Dilemma

    Euthanasia is a social issue in today’s world because not only does it affect the lives of those who are terminally ill and/or comatose, and the physicians who have been entrusted with their care, but it also affects the patient’s ability to have control over their own life, whether they are aware of this decision or not, which is one of the reasons why euthanasia has become such a controversial issue around the globe. Caddell and Newton (1995) define euthanasia as “any treatment initiated by a physician with the intent of hastening the death of another human being who is terminally ill and in severe pain or distress with the motive of relieving that person from great suffering” (p. 1,672). Even though the concept of great…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Assisted Euthanasia Ethical Analysis Essay
    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Assisted Euthanasia Ethical Analysis Essay

    Voluntary and assisted euthanasia is not a new phenomenon. End of life care for long term, short term, and terminal illnesses has always occurred. However, with advances in medicine, patients’ lives may be lengthened. For many individuals, end of life care is paired with pain and suffering. Does it have to be this way? If an individual has the capacity to make their own medical decisions, and wants to end their life, should we as health care providers deny them this? We can consider suicide as self-determined…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Ethical Dilemma of Euthanasia
    • 5176 Words
    • 21 Pages

    The Ethical Dilemma of Euthanasia

    involves life and death issues. For over 2000 years it has been a prohibited medical…

    • 5176 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Clinical Journal
    • 896 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Clinical Journal

    Currently my clinical setting is a post surgical unit. The nurses on this unit are…

    • 896 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia and Why Its Wrong
    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Euthanasia and Why Its Wrong

    There are several reasons why Euthanasia is wrong. I’m just going to name a few. First is because it doesn’t just effect the person choosing it, it also effects the family of the person choosing assisted suicide . Also another reason that euthanasia is wrong is because if you do choose assisted suicide you never know what’s going to happen after that moment. For all that you know it could get a whole lot better than what you are at that moment. The last but definitely not least is that Euthanasia denies the patients the final stage of growth.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Nursing Research
    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Nursing Research

    Euthanasia, whether assisted or voluntary, is the act of merciful killing and its purpose is to end suffering and pain of a patients terminal illness or injury. In two states physician assisted suicide is legal. The difference between euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide is in euthanasia – the healthcare provider actually does end the patients’ life. In physician-assisted suicide – the physician provides the patients with the means to perform the suicide themselves. Ethically, many principles need to be considered when options of euthanasia arise. Firstly, it is illegal in the United States, and secondly, it is considered against many ethical codes for a healthcare professional or provider to end life. The principles of non-maleficence, beneficence, and autonomy are three primary principles considered when the end of life for the patient is approaching. Healthcare professionals and healthcare providers should consider their state regulatory board limitations of practice and also code of ethics before allowing or assisting in euthanasia of patients despite their request. An analysis of ethical principles with respect to euthanasia of patients reveals that healthcare professionals and healthcare providers have to maintain nonmaleficence, beneficence and respect autonomy when making decisions and recommendations to their patients and their care.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics