Preview

Ethicality of Jurassic Park

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
557 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethicality of Jurassic Park
Andrew Jones
Philosophy 240
Katherine Allison Ethics in Jurassic Park

Even though Jurassic Park was made in the 90’s the main ethical dilemma is still extremely relevant in todays society, playing god with cloning. In Jurassic Park they used DNA from fossilized mosquitos to find the DNA of dinosaurs which they then use to clone the extinct species. By cloning the dinosaurs the ethical dilemma of should we as humans have the right to create a species that natural selection has removed from the world. The ethical value that I believe is best illustrated by the movie is Consequentualism because it states that consequences of an action are the ultimate deciding factor in whether or not an action is ethical. In the movie the belief that the amount that could be learned from the extinct species that were on the island far outweighed the problems of bringing back a species that natural selection had removed. With the technology available in todays society we now have the ability clone a species, even though it is not accepted by the majority of society. This does prevent a major question do we as Humans have the right to clone a species? Some people say no because it goes against natural selection, if a species was to weak to survive then for the good of the remainder of the world then it does not survive. There is also the possibility like in the movie that even though we think we know everything about this clone things will adapt and evolve to survive such as the dinosaurs evolving to reproduce while they were all females. While a large portion of society do not believe that we should clone any species there is the portion that whole heartedly support the quest to prefect not only the cloning of animals but the cloning of humans. By cloning we can create new ways to fight diseases and other health problems by doing things like cloning a liver for a person whose is shutting down. Cloning can also help bring a species back from the brink of extinction due

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Genetic engineering would be another ethical dilemma in bringing back the dinosaurs after they became extinct animals. There was a reason why natural selection took them off the face of the earth. The scientists took the DNA of dinosaurs from a mosquito that they found underground after it was fossilized in amber. With regard to what was said in the movie the scientists used frog DNA to fill the gaps between the dinosaurs DNA. It would have many scientists intrigued by this genetically engineered animal that was brought back to life but it would also have a lot of people scared if they somehow got their research stolen.…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Micheal Crichton’s 1990 novel “Jurassic Park,” is a science fiction cautionary tale of how reckless experimentation without proper oversight can lead to catastrophic results. The novel revolves around an isolated Costa Rican island and the dangerous experiments taking place there. When a series of mysterious animal attacks begin to occur on mainland Costa Rica, a connection is made between the attacks and the “biological reserve” on Isla Nublar. Two paleontologists Allen Grant and Ellie Sattler are among the group whisked away by billionaire John Hammond to the island for a weekend. The island is revealed to be Jurassic Park, a themed park showcasing the world’s first cloned dinosaurs. The scientists at John Hammond’s research company, InGen, used dinosaur DNA found in the blood of parasites preserved in amber to reconstruct dinosaurs. All the dinosaurs in the…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand, there are quite a few cons that potentially outweigh the pros of cloning humans. The first con is that human cloning is unnatural. According to Lombardo, “many feel that interfering with the natural process of pro-creation would lead to other attributes of life being altered” or displaced from society. Many people are opposed to this issue due to their religious beliefs, because they feel man will be replacing the higher being as the creator of creatures on this Earth. In a scientific point of view, using an older cell to create a new organism could possibly cause an “imprinted age [to] be place on the growing embryo”, resulting in faster aging (“Pros and Cons of Human Cloning”). Lastly, because human cloning is a roughly…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cloning is a process in which an organism or cell is replicated. Cloning should stop because it is not natural, it is wrong to force specific results. Cloning causes animals to live a shorter amount of time or be born with LOS causing permanent damage. What is not natural should not be forced especially if the results are…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Let's just say if a clone survives birth and it’s childhood and had Large Offspring Syndrome, If all of the conditions like cardiomyopathy diabetes, high rates of heart and lung damage, kidney failure brain abnormalities etc. The animal in labor and the clone is give birth in a filthy Barn house. In that scenario the clone animal that is giving birth, percentage of life is one in million. Another reason that cloning should not be in society is the lack of diversity. “Cloning involves a process of creating identical genes. As such, there would be a lack of diversity in animalkind. Scientists believe this lack of diversity will lower the different animal race’s ability to adapt. Plus, there would be a lack of diversity in the world leading to everyone looking the same.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The cloning portrayed in this film was pretty accurate to what cloning actually is although scientist today do not have the tools that they would need to clone a long extinct species, but the basic idea behind the idea is essentially the same. The type of cloning shown in Jurassic park is nuclear transfer as well as having a little bit of genetic engineering when they use frog DNA to fill in the missing holes in the dinosaurs DNA.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The position that human interests form the center of this universe- our desires, needs, goals, preferences, and our love for one another-as opposed to animals or even God has long been held as true. Moral philosophers however have recently challenged this anthropocentric view. Presently, there is increasing debate over how we treat the natural world and those we share it with. In Tom Regan's essay, "Are Zoos Morally Defensible" Tom explains two arguments against anthropocentrism, utilitarianism and the rights view, to answer the question of the defensibility of zoos.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jurassic Park

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Is it morally right to exploit animals? There are many opinions to this question and when applying it to Jurassic park, the matter becomes even more complicated.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal cloning, wow, 30 years ago this could only be thought of in Star Trek but now it’s a reality; and with this reality comes a whole myriad of ethical issues, but to fully understand animal cloning we have to know what it is so, what is animal cloning? Do we just zap a sheep and out pops another? No, it’s actually quite an intricate process but basically it involves this, you take the cell from a male sheep, combine it, using electric currents, with the egg of another sheep and then insert the blastocyst created into a surrogate sheep creating an exact replica of the donor male. But should we? I mean who are we to play god?…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People often say that certain animals will cease to exist as the decades continue. Although quite fascinating this wouldn’t work for extinct species. In order to make a clone you have to acquire an intact nucleus and fuse adult and egg cells together. Since this isn't available for extinct animals, most likely only those in endangered can be repopulated. This can allow some members of Weintraub’s audience to feel optimistic about technologies advances in cloning. Animal lovers will definitely gain satisfaction of never adding another animal to the extinct species list. Weintraub uses the audience emotions to create a connection between them a cloning. If cloning appears to be beneficial instead of harmful, people would be more likely to advocate for it instead of rallying against…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cloning can change the way we live our lives. If we could perfect cloning we could do amazing things with science. For example, cloning could help out in many experiments. Maybe save lives by helping to find a cure for diseases by using a clone of someone you were examining, but died in the process. Like the movie “My Sister's Keeper”, in this movie the oldest daughter is diagnosed with Leukemia and the parents create a younger daughter that is almost an exact replica of her. The younger of the two is used for parts every time the older needs them. Cloning could be used a lot in situations like this. “I take the view that anything you can do to relieve suffering or improve human health will usually be widely accepted by the public - that is to say, if cloning actually turned out to be solving some problems and was useful to people, I think it would be accepted.” (John…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many opinions that different from both sides of going for and against animal cloning. Jacqueline Langwith writes, “Some people don't like cloning because they do not like the idea of recreating an animal or species” (Langwith). Although her statement provides a rationale why certain people may not like this process, they do not understand that animal cloning is not hurting the species. Cloning is saving species. Therefore, animal cloning should be legalized. Cloning can save endangered species, researchers can use animal clones for a food source, and researchers can study organs and tissues from clones.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cloning could provide many advantages but includes many risks like the possibility to start a whole new war. An army of clones could be created which means other counties would have to follow. Cloning should still be legal because it could help people even this risk.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cloning Persuasive Essay

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The most prevalent and observable argument to support cloning lies in the form of cures. For centuries people have suffered from the undesirable effects of genetic diseases such as Tay-Sachs and Cystic Fibrosis. If cloning is endorsed, scientists will be able to study a subject that houses one of these genetic disorders, isolating the single gene on which the mutation occurs. Next they would observe the clone of that person, discovering for what reason the irregularity did not occur in their genes. Armed with this valuable data, scientists could then begin to develop gene therapies that would work to alleviate the cause for these rare diseases. While disorders such as Tay Sachs are…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jurassic Park

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jurassic Park is a book about the cloning of dinosaurs and they are used as the park entertainment on an island. In this park where dinosaurs are the attraction, not every thing will go as planned…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays