Ethics Case 4.1 Lying To Rachel Adams

According to the case 4.1 Lying to Rachel Adams, in my opinion, Janet's messages was not ethical when she interaction with Rachel. Adams was set up a meeting with Janet to asked Janet about merger things, Janet said Ballinger would be independent forever and promised that Ballinger are not going anywhere. But, Ballinger merger with other company after few mouths, and Janet already known this information before. So Janet did not told the truth fact to Rachel. And when Rachel known Ballinger merger with other company and talk with Janet, Janet said she had a moral obligation to Ballinger to do her job, her job is need to keeping Rachel here that’s means she need to omit certain information. Actually that is lie and non ethical.

Rachel changed