Preview

Ethics Chapter 1 Ethical Dilemma

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
685 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethics Chapter 1 Ethical Dilemma
Ethics Chapter 1

An Ethical Dilemma – Questions/Exercises

1. What is/are John’s ethical issues?

I do not know the exact definition of ethical but I believe it to be related to our behavior and the decisions we make and if they are considered right or wrong by society. I am sure there are times when a situation may be perfectly legal but we may not think it is okay. Keeping this in mind, John’s ethical issues include thoroughly researching IPOs and using this information to his advantage, pocketing profits from the shorting process, disregarding the non-compete clause and allowing mailings to be sent to his clients prior to resigning, indirectly letting his clients know he was personally paying for their expenses instead of charging them to the firm, buying and selling stocks without the client’s knowledge, and not giving the time and attention needed to properly train new hires.

2. Are there any legal considerations for John?

I think he could be held legally liable for all of the actions mentioned above if they are illegal. I am not sure if indirectly letting clients know he paid for their expenses and buying and selling their stocks without their knowledge is illegal. Obviously he is doing something illegal if the SEC is investigating. I guess he could be fined and/or be taken to trial depending on the severity of his actions and the amount of money involved.

3. Discuss the implications of each decision John has made and will make.

I am not a risk taker and I know I would question his character based on the decisions he has made and I would not trust him. However, it sounds as if this type of behavior may be the norm with stock brokers who are willing to take risks. The Sharks would probably be more accepting of his behavior because they are risk takers but the Cessna and Turtles would be less accepting because of being more conservative. I think John should cooperate with the SEC with the hopes of reducing the severity of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roger's dilemma case

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The new deal would make Dugas Incorporated stock price go from his current $3.14 to maybe $10 or $15 up. Without thinking about the consequences, Roger accessed SP’s operating account and used every last dollar to purchase 470,000 shares in Dugas Incorporated. Roger’s conduct was in violation of Part A of SP’s Code of Ethics, as he engaged in insider trading, by illegally making profit by trading on the basis of nonpublic information.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Technically Emerson did not violate these rules and would not be charged with anything if his uncle had not used information that he learned in casual conversation to purchase the stocks. However since his uncle did use the information in an illegal way the assumption of the prosecution will be that he did in fact violate the rules by giving a relative inside information about an upcoming securities…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jon Lebed

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this case study we learn about Jonathan Lebed, at 15 years old, the youngest person during that time and the first minor to ever to face proceedings by the SEC for stock-market fraud. In 2000, Jonathan Lebed caused chaos in the stock trading industry and was accused of “pumping and dumping” stocks over the Internet. Between September 1999 and February 2000 Lebed made hundreds of thousands of dollars by posting in internet chat rooms and on message boards encouraging people to buy penny stocks he already owned, thus, according to the SEC, artificially raising the price of the stock. Lebed was found guilty by the SEC of wrong doing under Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 which addresses fraud in the use on interstate commerce. Under these acts it is unlawful for a person to intentionally provide false statements for the purposes of deceiving buyers. The SEC settled with him for a $285,000 of his earnings. His actions proved that the Internet could be a very powerful tool for fraud.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    former stockbroker, deliberately break the law and risk a fortune to save what was a small…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Professional auditing standards discuss the three key “conditions” that are typically present when a financial fraud occurs and identify a lengthy list of “fraud risk factors.” Briefly explain the difference between a fraud “condition” and a “fraud risk factors,” and provide examples of each. What fraud conditions and fraud risk factors were apparently present in the Madoff case?…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No One Would Listen

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This book brought out the failures of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in one of the biggest Ponzi schemes in America’s history, as orchestrated by Bernie Madoff. Harry Markopolos caught up with Madoff’s Ponzi scheme earlier on in his career and saw all the red flags. There was no explanation of the continuous one percent yield in over forty five stocks that Madoff dealt with. Madoff took advantage of the laxity by the SEC officials in failing to follow up complains with an investigation, and the trust bestowed upon him by the high and mighty. As long as the public saw paper trail provided by Madoff that the stocks were continuously yielding dividends, there was no cause for alarm. The few people that realized that Madoff was actually pushing a Ponzi scheme alerted the appropriate authorities which in turn let Madoff off with a slap on the wrist. The SEC went to investigate Madoff in his building on the 18th and 19th floor but missed a whole 17th floor where the scam was mainly doing its operations. Over a period of nine years Markopolos alerted the SEC five times about the Ponzi scheme that Madoff was running, but they caught up with him when most of the money was already spent lavishly in gifts and exorbitant parties.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I feel it is a person’s choice and it is different than suicide. It has to be well thought out and talked about with a team of people involved including physicians, psychologists, and family. I also think it is based more on the person’s quality of life and their decision or choice should be honored. It’s not the same as suicide caused by a mental illness. This is not a well thought out plan and does not occur with a team of people.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bernie Madoff scheme is riddled with ethical dilemmas throughout. While Madoff was highly successful and established businessperson tracing back to 1960 when he began trading in counter stocks which were not listed on the New York Stock Exchange (BOOK). It slowly transformed to a grey area as Madoff’s largest clients began request and expecting greater returns. It appears that this was the first ethical dilemma that Madoff was faced with that began the downward spiral that result in the fraud of the century.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Bernard Madoff filed false reports and made misleading statements, his accountant David Friehling backed him 100%. This went on for roughly 17 years and $65 billion in stolen funds. It is during that time the Madoff 's Ponzi scheme went unnoticed affecting the lives of many swindled investors. Mr. Madoff’s financier and longtime CPA Mr. Friehling routinely rubber-stamped Mr. Madoff 's cooked books while reaping millions from their illegal so called investments. According to James Clarkson, who is the acting head of the Securities and Exchange Commission 's in the New York office, Mr. Friehling sold his accountant’s…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    assignment 3

    • 256 Words
    • 1 Page

    Because Aquaman withheld imformation and breeched his fiduciary duty he is guilty of violating 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b, which prohibit any person, directly or indirectly, from committing fraud in connection with the sale or purchase of securities.…

    • 256 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mr. Friehling is to convicted of charges including aiding and abetting investment adviser fraud, securities fraud and four counts filing false audit reports to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. It was also found by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission that Friehling and his family had $14 million invested in the Mr. Madoff‘s firm which violates auditing rules and standards. It is believed that Friehling is facing up to 105 years in prison for the breaches of accounting professionalism, along with a definite loss of his accounting license. Friehling also claims he had no idea of the Ponzi scheme and had no intention of breaching accounting violations.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inside Trading

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this case number (2012-255) concerning Insider Trading Ring Investment Banker Illegal Tips on Impending Merger on Dec 5, 2012. The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged an investment banker who was primarily based in Charlotte, N.C., and nine others involved in an insider trading ring that garnered more than $11 million in illicit profits trading on confidential information about impending mergers (SEC, 2012). John W. Femenia misused his position at Wells Fargo Securities to obtain material, nonpublic information about four separate merger transactions involving firm clients (SEC, 2012). Upon learning inside information about an impending deal, Femenia’s first call to set the insider trading ring in motion was typically to his longtime friend Shawn C. Hegedus, who worked as a registered broker (SEC, 2012). Femenia and Hegedus illegally tipped other friends who in turn tipped more friends or family members in a ring that spread across five states (SEC, 2012). This case related to the one from text reading because he had confidential information that he used to make a profit for himself and if the stockholders as well as partner are not given this information it can’t be legally used. In an important legal case, U.S. vs. O’Hagen, the Supreme Court clarified insider trad- ing law (Lawrence, A.T. and Weber, J. 2011). The court ruled that someone who traded on the basis of inside information when he or she knew the information was supposed to remain confidential was guilty of misappropriation, whether or not the trader was directly connected to the company whose shares were purchased (Lawrence, A.T. and Weber, J. 2011).…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethical Dilemma's

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Throughout history law enforcement officers have been given the power and responsibility to use discretion while preforming their assigned duties. In early history, law enforcement officers were given a lot of discretion, where as now, they do not. Many laws have restricted officer discretion because of abuse. There are many different scenarios when and how an officer can use discretion and as well as how much discretion they are able to use, depending on the situation. Furthermore, in some cases for example, the use of traffic speed cameras or intersection cameras can issue tickets to unaware motorists where an actual police officer may be able to use discretion, common sense and reasoning before issuing a ticket. Discretionary decision-making is a part of officer’s duties each and every day that he or she has their uniform on. It is essential to allow officers the ability to make these kinds of decisions, but also restrict it as not to allow corruption or situations to get out of control. Officer discretion often comes under scrutiny because of unequal treatment by officers towards citizens.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethical Dilemma

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Fraser, J. A., Mathews, B., & Walsh, K. (2009). Factors influencing child abuse and neglect recognition and reporting by nurses: A multivariate analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(2), 146-153. Retrieved from http://www.journalofnursing studies.com/article/S0020-7489(09)00173-4/abstract.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) Code of Professional Conduct, Section 102 is Integrity and Objectivity. Rule 102 states that “in the performance of any professional service, a member should maintain objectivity and integrity, shall be free of conflicts of interest, and shall not knowingly misrepresent facts or subordinate his or her judgment to other” (http://www.aicpa.org). Mr. John Irwin made materially false and misleading statements to existing and potential investors in connection with a Ponzi scheme and failed to disclose to investors that he was receiving a percentage of fees as compensation for helping to establish the fund. From February 1995 to December 2008, it was alleged John Irwin participated in a multi-million dollar Ponzi scheme orchestrated by Joseph S. Forte by soliciting investors for Forte LP and performed back office and bookkeeping functions for Forte LP that including creating and issuing to investors false quarterly statements and tax documents prepared based on false information provided by Forte. Mr. Irwin disregarded red flags that should have alerted him that the information he was passing on was false which over time allowed him to receive ill-gotten gains exceeding $5 million in purported fees and trading profits. John Irwin violated section 102.01 knowing misrepresentations in the preparation of financial statements or records and section 102.02 conflicts of interest. Mr. Irwin made false and misleading entries to the statements and records and failed to correct his mistakes and knew what he was doing was wrong. Since he was also receiving compensation for helping to establish a fund, that puts him as a conflict of interest because he now has a relationship with this company and will do whatever it takes to make this company look good financially. On July 11, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) settled the civil action case…

    • 1894 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays