Preview

Ethics Of Animal Testing: Is Animal Testing Morally Justified?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1878 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethics Of Animal Testing: Is Animal Testing Morally Justified?
Ethics of Animal Testing An animal’s life in a laboratory is a cold, unhappy and unhealthy way of living. So, lucky for Libby she was rescued just in time. Libby is a small dog that spent many of her years in an animal testing laboratory. She was kept in very unhealthy and filthy conditions. Although Libby was not an old dog when she was rescued, she had severe tooth decay and was terribly emaciated. Her body was desperately trying to fend of the parasitic hookworms and tapeworms that lived inside her. She was at last able to be rescued when PETA ( People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) released a video of lab workers torturing animals and pouring toxic chemicals on them. The company was shut down and the animal’s lives began …show more content…
For example, in the article, “Animal Testing: Is Animal Testing Morally Justified?”, when it says that “animal testing violates animals basic rights, and experiments conducted on them result in extreme and even torturous pain.” When being tested on, animals are often forced to endure harmful chemicals being poured on their skin and eyes. The same article reads, “Every year, tens of millions of animals are used in laboratory settings to gauge the toxicity of newly developed chemicals.” There are millions of animals that have to endure horrible traumas and pain every …show more content…
In fact, studies by the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine have proved that, “chimpanzees used in animal tests can exhibit symptoms of PTSD, a condition more commonly associated with soldiers who have experienced deadly combat” (Animal Testing: Is Animal Testing Morally Justified?). PTSD, also known as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, is a dangerous and harmful mental problem that causes extreme stress and nervousness in the subject. Furthermore, in humans who have returned from battles, symptoms usually include nightmares, reliving especially petrifying events, changes in mental state or beliefs and constant nervous or jittery feelings (“Issue Overview: Post Traumatic Stress Disorder”). The more the animals are tested on, the further along the condition gets. Lab rats and mice are also commonly used to test trauma. They are sometimes burned or shocked in order for scientists to further explain how like traumas could affect humans (“Animal Testing: Is Animal Testing Morally Justified?”). It is too unfair for these animals to suffer for our own

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    How would you feel if you were captured in a laboratory and forced to smell toxic fumes until death? Or immobilized in a restraining device for hours? Or have your skin burned off and spinal cord crushed? This is the reality for more than 100 million animals worldwide. In Canada, over 3.33 million animals are used in experiments and over 125 000 are subjected to severe pain. The animals are left for days to wait in fear of the next terrifying and traumatic experiment that will be performed on them. Major effects of stress and boredom trigger neurotic behaviors in the animals these include spinning in circles, rocking back and forth, pulling out their own hair and biting their own skin. Days go by, and after being locked in their tiny cages filled with fear, their journey usually ends with death. Animals are said to be used for advances and safety checks in products, but are the tests truly…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is cruel and barbaric. In the article "A change of heart about animals" by Jeremy Rifkin, featured in the los Angeles Times, Rifkin discussed how scientists have discovered that animals are not far different from humans. The studies show that animals have similar emotions and reactions when experiencing such emotions in times of distress or fear. Despite these finding, animals are still continually tested on for products and other experiments in order to see what the result would be.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, or in vivo testing, often uses non-human animals in experiments to test the safety of products and has been a topic of heated debate for decades. Although some research uses animals only for natural behaviors observation, F. Barbara Orlans claimed in her book, In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, that more than sixty percent of all animals used in animal testing suffer from experiment procedure or even get killed in biomedical research and product-safety testing. On the one hand, successful animal testing can lead to medical cures and treatments for human beings, on the other hand, opponents are doubting the reliability of animal…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is bad science. Time and time again animal experiments show that it is wasting lives and resources. “Most animal experiments are not relevant to human health. They do not contribute meaningfully to medical advances and many are undertaken simply out of curiosity” (Animal testing). Animals are not like humans. The way an animal reacts to a certain tests, may not be…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Though animal testing should be banned from ever being practiced or used again, people still view it as a necessity despite all of the evidence against it. Animal testing requires inhumane, unsanitary, unsafe, or cruel conditions that if done to humans would be outlawed since they either reduce the quality of life or cause disease or death. Seeing that animals are living, breathing creatures that want to survive just as much as people do, assuming that test conditions are not good for human kind, then they are not good for any living creatures. Furthermore, they are inherently wrong by nature. Tolerating animal cruelty promotes the same insensitivity that allows cruelty to people, such as serial killers and the early incidents of animal torture.…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animal Testing: Dangerous, Irresponsible, Pointless Teddy, a beagle, sat in his isolated cage with a number tattooed on his ear, void of human or other dog interactions. Throughout his life, all Teddy knew was research and isolation. He was born at Marshall BioResources, a dog facility whose only purpose was to sell the puppies for research (“Teddy’s Story”). Now, at Charles River Laboratories, the dogs are undergoing a painful, yearlong fungicide test commissioned by a pesticide company. After an investigation and weeks of public pressure, the experiment was deemed unnecessary, and Teddy, along with 31 other dogs, was released by the company and adopted.…

    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Benefits

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout history animals have been used to test everyday products and medicine to make sure they are safe for human consumption. The animal’s everyday life consist of torture, sleeping in cold cages, and often sometimes dying from the painful experiments performed on them. At times the animals are harmed so much that the start to show signs of erratic behavior like scratching their eyes out, biting themselves, and go through stages of stress or depression. After all the research is completed the animals are killed and thrown into medical waste. In todays the abuse continues. Numerous amounts of rabbits, rats, mice are being held in science laboratories across the world. Countless number of researchers believe that the only way to verify that…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Ethics

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It is not morally acceptable for scientists to use live animals in research for medicine that can be used to cure humans. Today we continue to use animals in experiments to learn more about health problems that affect both humans and animals and to ensure the safety of new medical treatments. Now that we know the purpose of animal testing, is it really worth killing millions of innocent animals? This practice is morally wrong and inconsiderate of us for letting this happen. People should stop using animals as experiment subjects and utilize the advance technology that we have now. This is happening because we are letting it happen! We have to start by educating others on this issue because the lack of knowledge on animal testing is why people…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benefits Of Animal Testing

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In animal testing, countless animals are experimented on and then killed after their use is up. Some are injured and will still live the remainder of their life in captivity. The doctors will not do anything to help the animals that are in pain that happen to be the reason because of them. It is the aspect of animals testing that many view as a major negative against the practice, as it seems that the animal died in vain because no direct benefit to humans occurred. Even though animals and humans have many things in common like how we both have the same organ system, there are also many things that are different between animals and humans. Many animals cannot handle or take the same medication as humans, most the surgeries that are operated on animals are just too strong for an animal to take so they end up dying or sick for the rest of their lives. (Animal Testing…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every year millions of animals are subjected to horrible unethical experimentations in order to advance medical science. Dogs, cats, monkeys, mice, and other animals are kept in dark rooms in cages while being exposed to various toxic and poisonous substances daily in order to test how the substance may react in humans. These poor creatures suffer from inhuman treatments and are denied any form of happiness, and these experiments should cease to and alternatives should be used instead.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    find treatment for anything from cancer to pain. If the results have a possibility to save so many…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is a major debate in today’s society, but it is not just a problem of today. Animal testing dates back the 1800’s when Charles Darwin's evolutionary theory served to suggest that animals could serve as effective models to facilitate biological understanding in humans. Other cases of animal testing include psychological experiments such as the one by Ivan Pavlov in the late nineteenth century. He conducted experiments on dogs to demonstrate how dogs could be conditioned with regards to memory and repetitive tasks, but the first major reference to animal testing occurred in the late nineteenth century when Louis Pasteur gave anthrax to sheep and showed the importance of vaccines with his germ theory. (Murnaghan, Screen 1) Major…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Cruelty to Animals in Laboratories." PETA. PETA. Web. 29 Oct. 2015.)…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is a very huge controversy and many people have an opinion on it. Some people wan animal testing to stop due to safety hazards and concerns for the animals, while others aren't so concerned about it, since testing it make it better for everyone. Animal testing used to be deemed necessary but not people can't be so sure. I personally believe that animal testing should continue and i will later state my reasons why. first, what exactly are the pros and cons of animal testing? Testing Animals has many good and bad reasons.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Those who are in favor of animal testing justify it many different ways. Thomas Hamm, a toxicologist and veterinarian, argues that, “We can’t protect the environment, or people in general, without doing some animal testing. If you’re pro-environment but opposed to animal testing, you’re on shaky ground, because the two positions just aren’t compatible with each other” (Fano, 44). In order to have a safe and successful society, he argues, we must use animals to test chemicals, drugs, treatments, and anything else that will further our knowledge of improving the world, at least for humans. Many people are of the same mind as Hamm. Animal testing reduces the risks of many products, like cosmetics and medication, among many others. Scientists can put safety standards in place for products based on their findings via animal testing. Often, animals will react badly or even die from certain chemicals or combinations, make the humans that use the products…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays